Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prédiction de la douleur postopératoire sévère et de la persistance de la douleur postchirurgicale par des tests psychophysiques

Prediction of severe and persistent postoperative pain by psychophysical testing

  • Article de Synthèse / Review Article
  • Published:
Douleur et Analgésie

Résumé

Les tests psychophysiques peuvent potentiellement identifier les patients à risque de présenter une douleur postopératoire sévère et de développer une douleur postopératoire persistante. L’identification de ce risque permettra de mettre en place une stratégie préventive. Cependant, les caractéristiques clinimétriques des tests proposés sont encore mal définies. Par conséquent, leur valeur prédictive reste limitée et doit encore être affinée afin d’être exploitable au lit du patient avec des protocoles standardisés et des données normatives pour patients chirurgicaux.

Abstract

Psychophysical testing has the potential to identify patients at risk for severe postsurgical pain and for developing persistent postsurgical pain. Identification of that risk should allow for better preemptive actions. However, the clinimetric characteristics of these tests are barely defined. Consequently, their predictive value remains limited and needs to be refined in order to be exploitable at the bedside with standardized protocols and normative data for surgical patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Références

  1. Lavand’homme P (2014) La douleur postopératoire: les enjeux actuels. Douleur Analg 27:131–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Martinez V (2014) Mécanismes de persistance des douleurs postopératoires. Intérêt du modèle chirurgical de prélèvement de crête iliaque. Douleur Analg 27:133–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shy ME, Frohman EM, So YT, et al (2003) Quantitative sensory testing: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 60:898–904

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gerbershagen HJ, Pogatzki-Zahn E, Aduckathil S, et al (2014) Procedure-specific risk factor analysis for the development of severe postoperative pain. Anesthesiol 120:1237–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Deumens R, Steyaert A, Forget P, et al (2013) Prevention of chronic postoperative pain: cellular, molecular, and clinical insights for mechanism-based treatment approaches. Prog Neurobiol 104:1–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Plaghki L, Mouraux A (2001) Fonctions psychométriques et méthodes psychophysiques adaptatives pour l’étude de la douleur. Doul Analg 1:73–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yarnitsky D (2010) Conditioned pain modulation (the diffuse noxious inhibitory control-like effect): its relevance for acute and chronic pain states. Curr Opin Anesthesiol 23:611–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Landau R, Kraft JC, Flint LY, et al (2010) An experimental paradigm for the Prediction of Post-Operative Pain (PPOP). J Vis Exp 35:e1671

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yarnitsky D, Crispel Y, Eisenberg E, et al (2008) Prediction of chronic post-operative pain: pre-operative DNIC testing identifies patients at risk. Pain 38:22–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alappattu MJ, Bishop MD, Bialosky JE, et al (2011) Stability of behavioral estimates of activity-dependent modulation of pain. J Pain Res 4:151–7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Granot M, Granovsky Y, Sprecher E, et al (2006) Contact heatevoked temporal summation: tonic versus repetitive-phasic stimulation. Pain 122:295–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kong JT, Johnson KA, Balise RR, Mackey S (2013) Test-Retest Reliability of Thermal Temporal Summation Using an Individualized Protocol. J Pain 14:79–88

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Neziri AY, Haesler S, Petersen-Felix S, et al (2010) Generalized expansion of nociceptive reflex receptive fields in chronic pain patients. Pain 151:798–805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sarlani E, Garrett PH, Grace EG, Greenspan JD (2007) Temporal summation of pain characterizes women but not men with temporomandibular disorders. J Orofacial Pain 21:309–17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Staud R, Vierck CJ, Cannon RL, et al (2001) Abnormal sensitization and temporal summation of second pain (wind-up) in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Pain 91:165–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yarnitsky D, Arendt-Nielsen L, Bouhassira D, et al (2010) Recommendations on terminology and practice of psychophysical DNIC testing. Eur J Pain 14:339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pud D, Granovsky Y, Yarnitsky D (2009) The methodology of experimentally induced diffuse noxious inhibitory control (DNIC)-like effect in humans. Pain 144:16–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ram KC, Eisenberg E, Haddad M, Pud D (2008) Oral opioid use alters DNIC but not cold pain perception in patients with chronic pain — new perspective of opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Pain 139:431–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Moloney NA, Hall TM, Doody CM (2012) Reliability of thermal quantitative sensory testing: a systematic review. J Rehab Res Dev 49:191–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Werner MU, Petersen MA, Bischoff JM (2013) Test-retest studies in quantitative sensory testing: a critical review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scan 57:957–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Olesen SS, van Goor H, Bouwense SA, et al (2012) Reliability of static and dynamic quantitative sensory testing in patients with painful chronic pancreatitis. Reg Anest Pain Med 37:530–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nir RR, Yarnitsky D, Honigman L, Granot M (2012) Cognitive manipulation targeted at decreasing the conditioning pain perception reduces the efficacy of conditioned pain modulation. Pain 153:170–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gilron I, Kehlet H (2014) Prevention of chronic pain after surgery: new insights for future research and patient care. Can J Anesthesiol 61:101–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ip HYV, Abrishami A, Peng PW, et al (2009) Predictors of postoperative pain and analgesic consumption: a qualitative systematic review. Anesthesiology 111:657–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bisgaard T, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H (2005) From acute to chronic pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective follow-up analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol 40:1358–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nikolajsen L, Minella CE (2009) Acute postoperative pain as a risk factor for chronic pain after surgery. Eur J Pain Suppl 3:29–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wilder-Smith OH (2013) A paradigm shift in pain medicine: implementing a systematic approach to altered pain processing in everyday clinical practice based on quantitative sensory testing. https://smi.hst.aau.dk/fileadmin/files/News/DSc_ows_final.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cruz-Ammeida Y, Fillingim RB (2014) Can quatitative sensory testing move us closer to mechanism-based pain management? Pain Med 15:61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Grosen K, Fischer IWD, Olesen AE, Drewes AM (2013) Can quantitative sensory testing predict responses to analgesic treatment? Eur J Pain 17:1267–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Pan PH, Coghill R, Houle TT, et al (2006) Multifactorial preoperative predictors for postcesarean section pain and analgesic requirement. Anesthesiology 104:417–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Werner MU, Mjöbo HN, Nielsen PR, Rudin A (2010) Prediction of postoperative pain: a systematic review of predictive experimental pain studies. Anesthesiology 112:1494–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Granot M, Lowenstein L, Yarnitsky D, et al (2003) Postcesarean section pain prediction by preoperative experimental pain assessment. Anesthesiology 98:1422–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ahmad S, De Oliveira GS, Bialek JM, McCarthy RJ (2014) Thermal quantitative sensory testing to predict postoperative pain outcomes following gynecologic surgery. Pain Med 15:857–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. De Oliveira GS Jr, Agarwal D, Benzon HT (2012) Perioperative single dose ketorolac to prevent postoperative pain: a metaanalysis of randomized trials. Anesth Analg 114:424–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Eisenberg E, Midbari A, Haddad M, Pud D (2010) Predicting the analgesic effect to oxycodone by “static” and “dynamic” quantitative sensory testing in healthy subjects. Pain 151:104–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Graven-Nielsen T, Wodehouse T, Langford RM, et al (2012) Normalization of widespread hyperesthesia and facilitated spatial summation of deep-tissue pain in knee osteoarthritis patients after knee replacement. Arthritis Rheum 64:2907–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Granot M (2009) Can we predict persistent postoperative pain by testing preoperative experimental pain? Curr Opin Anesthesiol 22:425–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Johansen A, Schirmer H, Stubhaug A, Nielsen CS (2014) Persistent post-surgical pain and experimental pain sensitivity in the Tromsø study: comorbid pain matters. Pain 155:341–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Schreiber KL, Martel MO, Shnol H, et al (2013) Persistent pain in postmastectomy patients: comparison of psychophysical, medical, surgical, and psychosocial characteristics between patients with and without pain. Pain 154:660–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wilder-Smith OH, Schreyer T, Scheffer GJ, Arendt-Nielsen L (2010) Patients with chronic pain after abdominal surgery show less preoperative endogenous pain inhibition and more postoperative hyperalgesia: a pilot study. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother 24:119–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wilder-Smith OH (2011) Chronic pain and surgery: a review of new insights from sensory testing. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother 25:146–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Neurosciences (IoNS), Université catholique de Louvain, avenue Mounier, 53 Bte, B-1200, Bruxelles, Belgique

    L. Plaghki & A. Mouraux

Authors
  1. L. Plaghki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Mouraux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Plaghki.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Plaghki, L., Mouraux, A. Prédiction de la douleur postopératoire sévère et de la persistance de la douleur postchirurgicale par des tests psychophysiques. Douleur analg 27, 154–161 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11724-014-0392-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11724-014-0392-x

Mots clés

Keywords

Search

Navigation