Skip to main content
Log in

Mysticism of Chan/Zen Enlightenment: A Rational Understanding through Practices

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There exists a widely accepted opinion in Chan/Zen 禪 studies that Chan enlightenment is a mysterium ineffabile, impenetrable by human intellect. Reviewing the debate between Hu Shi 胡適 and D. T. Suzuki (Suzuki Daisetsu 鈴木大拙) over Chan enlightenment and accounts of testimony by Chan masters and practitioners in history, this essay argues that Chan enlightenment can be understood rationally and intellectually. By analyzing the time-honored Chan practices that have led to enlightenment, it seeks to understand the mystery as an extraordinary mental condition in which an enlightened person temporarily blocks thinking in terms of language, consciousness, and intellect, and experiences a momentary “erasing” of what has been impressed on the psyche since birth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin, James H. 1998. Zen and the Brain: Toward an Understanding of Meditation and Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • ____. 2006. Zen-Brain Reflections: Reviewing Recent Developments in Meditation and State of Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Barthes, Roland. 1982. Empire of Signs. Trans. by Richard Howard. New York: Hill and Wang.

  • Benveniste, Émile. 1966. Problèmes de linguistiques générale, vol. 1. Paris: Gallimard.

  • Cheng, Chug-ying. 1973. “On Zen (Ch’an) Language and Zen Paradoxes.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 1: 77–102.

  • Dumoulin, Heinrich. 2007. Zen Enlightenment: Origins and Meaning. Trans. from the German by John C. Maraldo. Boston and London: Shambala.

  • Eisai. 2001. “Propagation of Zen for the Protection of the State.” In Sources of Japanese Tradition, comp. by Wm. Theodore de Bary, Carol Gluck, and Arthur E. Tiedemann. 2nd ed., vol. 2. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Faure, Bernard. 1993. Chan Insights and Oversights: An Epistemological Critique of the Chan Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Fromm, Erich. 1960. “Psychoanalysis and Zen Buddhism.” In Erich Fromm, D. T. Suzuki, and Richard De Martino, Zen Buddhism and Psychoanalysis. New York: Harper & Brothers.

  • Gu, Ming Dong. 2015. “Momentary Return of the Cosmic Unconscious: The Nature of Zen Enlightenment.” Asian Philosophy 25.4: 402–417.

  • Heidegger, Martin. 2010. “Language.” In Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism, edited by Vincent B. Leitch, William E. Cain, Laurie A. Finke, Barbara E. Johnson, John McGowan, et al. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.

  • Hu, Shih. 1953. “Ch’an (Zen) Buddhism in China: Its History and Method.” Philosophy East and West 3.1: 3–24.

  • Huineng. 1967. The Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriarch: The Text of the Tun-huang Manuscript. Trans. by Philip B. Yampolsky. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Jung, C. G. 1949. “Foreword.” In An Introduction to Zen Buddhism, by D. T. Suzuki. London: Rider.

  • ____. 1978. Psychology and the East. Trans. by R. F. C. Hull. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Kapleau, Phillip, comp. and ed. 1980. The Three Pillars of Zen: Teaching, Practice and Enlightenment. New York: Anchor Books.

  • Lacan, Jacques. 1977. “Agency of the Letter in the Unconscious or Reason since Freud.” In Écrits: A Selection, trans. by Bruce Fink. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.

  • Miura, Isshū, and Ruth Fuller Sasaki. 1965. The Zen Koan: Its History and Use in Renzai Zen. New York: Harvest Books.

  • ____. 1967. Zen Dust: The History of the Kōan and Kōan Study in Rinzai (Lin-Chi) Zen. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

  • Nan, Huai-Chin. 1995. The Story of Chinese Zen. Trans. by Thomas Cleary. Boston: Charles E. Tuttle.

  • Suzuki, D. T. 1953. “Zen: A Reply to Hu Shih.” Philosophy East and West 3.1: 25–46.

  • ____. 1986. Living by Zen. London: Rider Books.

  • ____. 1994. Essays on Zen Buddhism. New York: Grove Press.

  • Ta-hui. 2008. “Swampland Flower (excerpts).” In Zen Sourcebook: Traditional Documents from China, Korea, and Japan, edited by Stephen Addiss, with Stanley Lombardo and Judith Roitman. Indianapolis and Oxford: Hackett Publishing Co.

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1922/1974. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Trans. by C. K. Ogden. London and New York: Routledge.

  • Wudeng Huiyuan 五燈會元 (Collected Essentials of the Five Transmitted Lamps). 1635. Comp. by Dachuan Puji 大川普濟. Reprint in the Chongzhen 崇禎 reign of the Ming 明 dynasty.

  • Yuanwu Keqin 圓悟克勤. 2004. Sayings by Chan Master Yuanwu Foguo 圓悟佛果禪師語錄. In Complete Works of Chan Buddhism 禪宗全書, vol. 41. Beijing 北京: Beijing Tushuguan Chubanshe 北京圖書館出版社.

  • Zhuangzi 莊子. 1995. Zhuangzi. Shanghai: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe 上海古籍出版社.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Dong Gu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gu, M.D., Guo, J. Mysticism of Chan/Zen Enlightenment: A Rational Understanding through Practices. Dao 16, 235–251 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-017-9549-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-017-9549-7

Keywords

Navigation