Skip to main content
Log in

Contemplation and the Moral Life in Confucius and Aristotle

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aristotle’s best human life is attained through theoretical contemplation, and Confucius’ is attained through practical cultivation of the social self. However, I argue that in the best human life for both Confucius and Aristotle, a form of theoretical contemplation must occur and can only occur with an ethical commitment to community life. Confucius, like Aristotle, sees that the best contemplation comes after later-life, greater-learning and is central to ethical and community life. Aristotle, like Confucius, sees the best contemplation as presupposing full ethical commitment to community life. So, I argue for the theses that: (a) on Aristotle’s view, the best human contemplation requires one be fully morally good; (b) on Confucius’ view, to be fully morally good requires the best human contemplation; (c) being fully morally good for both requires commitment to the good of others and the community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, Roger, and Henry Rosemont. 1998. The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Ballentine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angle, Stephen. 2009. Sagehood: The Contemporary Significance of Neo-Confucian Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Edited by Jonathan Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Curzer, Howard. 1991. “Aristotle’s Much Maligned Megalopsychos.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69.2: 131–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorter, Kenneth. 2009. “Metaphysics and Morality in Neo-Confucianism and Greece: Zhu Xi, Plato, Aristotle, and Plotinus.” Dao 8.3: 255–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, Daniel. 2003. Z hu Xi’s Reading of the Analects: Canon, Commentary and the Classical Tradition. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2007. The Four Books: The Basic Teachings of the Later Confucian Tradition. New York: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, David, and Roger Ames. 1987. Thinking Through Confucius. New York: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ni, Peimin. 2009. “How Far is Confucius an Aristotelian?” Dao 8.3: 311–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sim, May. 2007. Remastering Morals with Aristotle and Confucius. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Slingerland, Edward. 1996. “The Conception of Ming in Early Confucian Thought.” Philosophy East and West 46.4: 567–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T’ang, Chün-i (Tang Junyi). 1962. “The T’ien Ming [Heavenly Ordinance] in Pre-Ch’in China.” Philosophy East and West 11.4: 195–218.

  • Van Norden, Bryan. 2007. Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early China. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Matthew. 2010. “The Utility of Contemplation in Aristotle’s Protrepticus.” Ancient Philosophy 30: 135–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Jiyuan. 2007. The Ethics of Confucius and Aristotle: Mirrors of Virtue. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sean Drysdale Walsh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Walsh, S.D. Contemplation and the Moral Life in Confucius and Aristotle. Dao 14, 13–31 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-014-9414-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-014-9414-x

Keywords

Navigation