Skip to main content
Log in

An equilibrium analysis of the land use structure in the Yunnan Province, China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Earth Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Global land use structure is changing rapidly due to unceasing population growth and accelerated urbanization, which leads to fierce competition between the rigid demand for built-up area and the protection of cultivated land, forest, and grassland. It has been a great challenge to realize the sustainable development of land resources. Based on a computable general equilibrium model of land use change with a social accounting matrix dataset, this study implemented an equilibrium analysis of the land use structure in the Yunnan Province during the period of 2008–2020 under three scenarios, the baseline scenario, low TFP (total factor productivity) scenario, and high TFP scenario. The results indicated that under all three scenarios, area of cultivated land declined significantly along with a remarkable expansion of built-up area, while areas of forest, grassland, and unused land increased slightly. The growth rate of TFP had first negative and then positive effects on the expansion of built-up area and decline of cultivated land as it increased. Moreover, the simulated changes of both cultivated land and built-up area were the biggest under the low TFP scenario, and far exceeded the limit in the Overall Plan for Land Utilization in the Yunnan Province in 2020. The scenario-based simulation results are of important reference value for policy-makers in making land use decisions, balancing the fierce competition between the protection of cultivated land and the increasing demand for built-up area, and guaranteeing food security, ecological security, and the sustainable development of land resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bender O, Boehmer H J, Jens D, Schumacher K P (2005). Analysis of land-use change in a sector of Upper Franconia (Bavaria, Germany) since 1850 using land register records. Landscape Ecol, 20(2): 149–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carreño L, Frank F C, Viglizzo E F (2012). Tradeoffs between economic and ecosystem services in Argentina during 50 years of land-use change. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 154: 68–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das G G, Alavalapati J R R, Carter D R, Tsigas M E (2005). Regional impacts of environmental regulations and technical change in the US forestry sector: a multiregional CGE analysis. For Policy Econ, 7(1): 25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFries R, Hansen A, Turner B L, Reid R, Liu J (2007). Land use change around protected areas: management to balance human needs and ecological function. Ecol Appl, 17(4): 1031–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng X Z (2011). Modeling the Dynamics and Consequences of Land System Change. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 183–207

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deng X Z, Su H B, Zhan J Y (2008). Integration of multiple data sources to simulate the dynamics of land systems. Sensors (Basel Switzerland), 8(2): 620–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng X Z, Yin F, Lin Y Z, Jin Q, Qu R J (2012). Equilibrium analyses on structural changes of land uses in Jiangxi Province. J Food Agric Environ, 10(1): 846–852

    Google Scholar 

  • Falcucci A, Maiorano L, Boitani L (2007). Changes in land-use/landcover patterns in Italy and their implications for biodiversity conservation. Landscape Ecol, 22(4): 617–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueroa F, Sanchez-Cordero V, Meave J A, Trejo I (2009). Socioeconomic context of land use and land cover change in Mexican biosphere reserves. Environ Conserv, 36(3): 180–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley J A, Defries R, Asner G P, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter S R, Chapin F S, Coe M T, Daily G C, Gibbs H K, Helkowski J H, Holloway T, Howard E A, Kucharik C J, Monfreda C, Patz J A, Prentice I C, Ramankutty N, Snyder P K (2005). Global consequences of land use. Science, 309(5734): 570–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm V, Revilla E, Berger U, Jeltsch F, Mooij W M, Railsback S F, Thulke H H, Weiner J, Wiegand T, DeAngelis D L (2005). Patternoriented modeling of agent-based complex systems: lessons from ecology. Science, 310(5750): 987–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Himiyama Y (1998). Land use cover changes in Japan: from the past to the future. Hydrol Processes, 12(13–14): 1995–2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ianchovichina E, Darwin R, Shoemaker R (2001). Resource use and technological progress in agriculture: a dynamic general equilibrium analysis. Ecol Econ, 38(2): 275–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenerette G D, Wu J G (2001). Analysis and simulation of land-use change in the central Arizona-Phoenix region, USA. Landscape Ecol, 16(7): 611–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin E F, Turner B L, Geist H J, Agbola S B, Angelsen A, Bruce JW, Coomes O T, Dirzo R, Fischer G, Folke C, George P S, Homewood K, Imbernon J, Leemans R, Li X, Moran E F, Mortimore M, Ramakrishnan P S, Richards J F, Skånes H, Steffen W, Stone G D, Svedin U, Veldkamp T A, Vogel C, Xu J (2001). The causes of landuse and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Glob Environ Change, 11(4): 261–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lassoie J P, Sherman R E (2010). Promoting a coupled human and natural systems approach to addressing conservation in complex mountainous landscapes of Central Asia. Front Earth Sci China, 4(1): 67–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levasseur A, Lesage P, Margni M, Brandao M, Samson R (2012). Assessing temporary carbon sequestration and storage projects through land use, land-use change and forestry: comparison of dynamic life cycle assessment with ton-year approaches. Clim Change, 115(3–4): 759–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y Z, Deng X Z, Zhan J Y (2013). Simulation of regional land use competition for Jiangxi Province. Resources Science, 35(4): 729–738 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J Y, Deng X Z, Liu M L, Zhang S W (2002). Study on the spatial patterns of land-use change and analysis of driving forces in Northeastern China during 1990–2000. Chin Geogr Sci, 12(4): 299–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J Y, Zhang Z, Xu X, Kuang W, Zhou W, Zhang S, Li R, Yan C, Yu D, Wu S, Jiang N (2010). Spatial patterns and driving forces of land use change in China during the early 21st century. J Geogr Sci, 20(4): 483–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J Y, Liu M L, Zhuang D F, Zhang Z X, Deng X Z (2003). Study on spatial pattern of land-use change in China during 1995–2000. Sci China Ser D, 46(4): 373–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long H, Tang G, Li X, Heilig G K (2007). Socio-economic driving forces of land-use change in Kunshan, the Yangtze River Delta economic area of China. J Environ Manage, 83(3): 351–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo G, Yin C, Chen X, Xu W, Lu L (2010). Combining system dynamic model and CLUE-S model to improve land use scenario analyses at regional scale: a case study of Sangong watershed in Xinjiang, China. Ecol Complex, 7(2): 198–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzger M J, Rounsevell M D A, Acosta-Michlik L, Leemans R, Schrötere D (2006). The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 114(1): 69–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otto V M, Löschel A, Reilly J (2008). Directed technical change and differentiation of climate policy. Energy Econ, 30(6): 2855–2878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overmars K P, Verburg P H (2006). Multilevel modelling of land use from field to village level in the Philippines. Agric Syst, 89(2–3): 435–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overmars K P, Verburg P H, Veldkamp A (2007). Comparison of a deductive and an inductive approach to specify land suitability in a spatially explicit land use model. Land Use Policy, 24(3): 584–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker D C, Manson S M, Janssen M A, Hoffmann M J, Deadman P (2003). Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and landcover change: a review. Ann Assoc Am Geogr, 93(2): 314–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauleit S, Ennos R, Golding Y (2005). Modeling the environmental impacts of urban land use and land cover change—A study in Merseyside, UK. Landsc Urban Plan, 71(2–4): 295–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian G J, Ouyang Y, Quan Q, Wu J G (2011). Simulating spatiotemporal dynamics of urbanization with multi-agent systems—A case study of the Phoenix metropolitan region, USA. Ecol Modell, 222(5): 1129–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner B L, Meyer W B (1991). Land use and land cover in global environmental change: considerations for study. International Social Science Journal, 43(4): 669–679

    Google Scholar 

  • Veldkamp A, Fresco L O (1996). CLUE-CR: an integrated multi-scale model to simulate land use change scenarios in Costa Rica. Ecol Modell, 91(1–3): 231–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg P H, Overmars K P, HuigenMG A, de Groot WT, Veldkamp A (2006a). Analysis of the effects of land use change on protected areas in the Philippines. Appl Geogr, 26(2): 153–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg P H, Rounsevell M D A, Veldkamp A (2006b). Scenario-based studies of future land use in Europe. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 114(1): 1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg P H, Schulp C J E, Witte N, Veldkamp A (2006c). Downscaling of land use change scenarios to assess the dynamics of European landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 114(1): 39–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg P H, Veldkamp A, Fresco L O (1999). Simulation of changes in the spatial pattern of land use in China. Appl Geogr, 19(3): 211–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Choi W, Deal B M (2005). Long-term impacts of land-use change on non-point source pollutant loads for the St. Louis metropolitan area, USA. Environ Manage, 35(2): 194–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu S, Mickley L J, Kaplan J O, Jacob D J (2012). Impacts of changes in land use and land cover on atmospheric chemistry and air quality over the 21st century. Atmos Chem Phys, 12(3): 1597–1609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu W, Yin Y, Zhou S (2007). Social and economic impacts of carbon sequestration and land use change on peasant households in rural China: a case study of Liping, Guizhou Province. J Environ Manage, 85(3): 736–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan H, Liu J, Huang H, Tao B, Cao M (2009). Assessing the consequence of land use change on agricultural productivity in China. Global Planet Change, 67(1–2): 13–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida R, Iizumi T, Nishimori M, Yokozawa M (2012). Impacts of land-use changes on surface warming rates and rice yield in Shikoku, western Japan. Geophys Res Lett, 39(22), doi: 10.1029/2012GL053711

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Wang K, Chen H, Liu H, Yue Y, Zhang W (2010). Impacts of land use and land cover changes upon organic productivity values in Karst ecosystems: a case study of Northwest Guangxi, China. Front Earth Sci China, 4(1): 3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao B, Kreuter U, Li B, Ma Z J, Chen J K, Nakagoshi N (2004). An ecosystem service value assessment of land-use change on Chongming Island, China. Land Use Policy, 21(2): 139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao W Z, Xiao H L, Liu Z M, Li J (2005). Soil degradation and restoration as affected by land use change in the semiarid Bashang area, northern China. Catena, 59(2): 173–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinyan Zhan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, J., Zhan, J., Lin, Y. et al. An equilibrium analysis of the land use structure in the Yunnan Province, China. Front. Earth Sci. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-013-0425-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-013-0425-z

Keywords

Navigation