Abstract
Emergy theory and method are used to evaluate the contribution of irrigation water, and the process of its utilization, in three agricultural systems. The agricultural systems evaluated in this study were rice, wheat, and oilseed rape productions in an irrigation pumping district of China. A corresponding framework for emergy evaluation and sensitivity analysis methods was proposed. Two new indices, the fraction of irrigation water (FIW), and the irrigation intensity of agriculture (IIA), were developed to depict the contribution of irrigation water. The calculated FIW indicated that irrigation water used for the rice production system (34.7%) contributed more than irrigation water used for wheat (5.3%) and oilseed rape (11.2%) production systems in a typical dry year. The wheat production with an IIA of 19.0 had the highest net benefit from irrigation compared to the rice (2.9) and oilseed rape (8.9) productions. The transformities of the systems’ products represented different energy efficiencies for rice (2.50E + 05 sej·J−1), wheat (1.66E + 05 sej·J−1) and oilseed rape (2.14E + 05 sej·J−1) production systems. According to several emergy indices, of the three systems evaluated, the rice system had the greatest level of sustainability. However, all of them were less sustainable than the ecological agricultural systems. A sensitivity analysis showed that the emergy inputs of irrigation water and nitrogenous fertilizer were the highest sensitivity factors influencing the emergy ratios. Best Management Practices, and other agroecological strategies, could be implemented to make further improvements in the sustainability of the three systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agostinho F, Diniz G, Siche R, Ortega E (2008). The use of emergy assessment and the Geographical Information System in the diagnosis of small family farms in Brazil. Ecol Modell, 210(1–2): 37–57
Amekawa Y, Sseguya H, Onzere S, Carranza I (2010). Delineating the multifunctional role of agroecological practices: toward sustainable livelihoods for smallholder farmers in developing countries. J Sustain Agric, 34(2): 202–228
Barton D N (2002). The transferability of benefit transfer: contingent valuation of water quality improvements in Costa Rica. Ecol Econ, 42(1–2): 147–164
Bastianoni S, Marchettini N, Panzieri M, Tiezzi E (2001). Sustainability assessment of a farm in the Chianti area (Italy). J Clean Prod, 9(4): 365–373
Blamey R, Gordon J, Chapman R (1999). Choice modelling: assessing the environmental values of water supply options. Aust J Agric Resour Econ, 43(3): 337–357
Brandt-Williams S L (2002). Handbook of Emergy Evaluation. Folio# 4. Emergy of Florida Agriculture (2nd printing).
Center for Environmental Policy, Environmental Engineering Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Brown M, Bardi E (2001). Handbook of Emergy Evaluation. Folio# 3: Emergy of Ecosystems. Center for Environmental Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville
Brown M T, Martínez A, Uche J (2010). Emergy analysis applied to the estimation of the recovery of costs for water services under the European Water Framework Directive. Ecol Modell, 221(17): 2123–2132
Brown M T, McClanahan T (1996). Emergy analysis perspectives of Thailand and Mekong River dam proposals. Ecol Modell, 91(1–3): 105–130
Brown M T, Ulgiati S (1997). Emergy-based indices and ratios to evaluate sustainability: monitoring economies and technology toward environmentally sound innovation. Ecol Eng, 9(1–2): 51–69
Buenfil A A (2001). Emergy evaluation of water. Dissertation for Ph.D Degree. Gainesville: University of Florida
Cavalett O, Queiroz J F, Ortega E (2006). Emergy assessment of integrated production systems of grains, pig and fish in small farms in the South Brazil. Ecol Modell, 193(3–4): 205–224
Chen B, Chen G (2006). Ecological footprint accounting based on emergy-A case study of the Chinese society. Ecol Modell, 198(1–2): 101–114
Chen B, Chen G Q (2009). Emergy-based energy and material metabolism of the Yellow River basin. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul, 14(3): 923–934
Chen B, Chen Z, Zhou Y, Zhou J, Chen G (2009a). Emergy as embodied energy based assessment for local sustainability of a constructed wetland in Beijing. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul, 14(2): 622–635
Chen D, Chen J, Luo Z H (2012). Communications on emergy indices of regional water ecological-economic system. Ecol Eng, 46: 116–117
Chen D, Chen J, Luo Z H, Lv Z W (2009b). Emergy evaluation of the natural value of water resources in Chinese rivers. Environ Manage, 44(2): 288–297
Chen D, Chen J, Lv ZW, Chen X (2008). A quantitative analysis method in water sciences research: emergy theory and method. Journal of China Three Gorges University(Natural Sciences), 30(2): 1–5
Chen D, Luo Z H, Webber M, Chen J, Wang W G (2013). Emergy evaluation of a pumping irrigation water production system in China. Frontiers of Earth Science, doi: 10.1007/s11707-013-0367-x
Chen D, Webber M, Chen J, Luo Z H (2011). Emergy evaluation perspectives of an irrigation improvement project proposal in China. Ecol Econ, 70(11): 2154–2162
Chen G Q, Jiang M M, Chen B, Yang Z F, Lin C (2006). Emergy analysis of Chinese agriculture. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 115(1–4): 161–173
Chen S Q, Chen B (2011). Assessing inter-city ecological and economic relations: an emergy-based conceptual model. Frontiers of Earth Science, 5(1): 97–102
Chen S Q, Chen B (2012). Sustainability and future alternatives of biogas-linked agrosystem (BLAS) in China: an emergy synthesis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 16(6): 3948–3959
Connor J D, Schwabe K, King D, Knapp K (2012). Irrigated agriculture and climate change: the influence of water supply variability and salinity on adaptation. Ecol Econ, 77: 149–157
Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill R V, Paruelo J, Raskin R G, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1998). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecol Econ, 25(1): 3–15
de Barros I, Blazy J M, Rodrigues G S, Tournebize R, Cinna J P (2009). Emergy evaluation and economic performance of banana cropping systems in Guadeloupe (FrenchWest Indies). Agric Ecosyst Environ, 129(4): 437–449
Faux J, Perry G M (1999). Estimating irrigation water value using hedonic price analysis: a case study in Malheur County, Oregon. Land Econ, 75(3): 440–452
Gohar A A, Ward F A, Amer S A (2013). Economic performance of water storage capacity expansion for food security. J Hydrol (Amst), 484: 16–25
Hau J L, Bakshi B R (2004). Promise and problems of emergy analysis. Ecol Modell, 178(1–2): 215–225
Huang Q, Rozelle S, Lohmar B, Huang J, Wang J (2006). Irrigation, agricultural performance and poverty reduction in China. Food Policy, 31(1): 30–52
Hussain I, Sial M H, Hussain Z, Akram W (2009). Economic value of irrigation water: evidence from a Punjab Canal. Lahore Journal of Economics, 14(1): 69–84
Hussain I, Turral H, Molden D, Ahmad M D (2007). Measuring and enhancing the value of agricultural water in irrigated river basins. Irrig Sci, 25(3): 263–282
Ingwersen W W (2010). Uncertainty characterization for emergy values. Ecol Modell, 221(3): 445–452
Jabeen S, Ashfaq M, Baig A (2006). Linear program modeling for determining the value of irrigation water. J Agric Soc Sci, 2(2): 101–105
Jiang M M, Chen B, Zhou J B, Tao F R, Li Z, Yang Z F, Chen G Q (2007). Emergy account for biomass resource exploitation by agriculture in China. Energy Policy, 35(9): 4704–4719
Jiang W L (1998). The research of value-model assessment about value of water resource. Journal of natural resources, 1: 35–43
Kang D, Park S S (2002). Emergy evaluation perspectives of a multipurpose dam proposal in Korea. J Environ Manage, 66(3): 293–306
Kim C, Schaible G D (2000). Economic benefits resulting from irrigation water use: theory and an application to groundwater use. Environ Resour Econ, 17(1): 73–87
La Rosa A, Siracusa G, Cavallaro R (2008). Emergy evaluation of Sicilian red orange production. A comparison between organic and conventional farming. J Clean Prod, 16(17): 1907–1914
Lan S F, Qin P, Lu H F (2002). Emergy Analysis of Eco-economic System. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press
Larson C (2013). Climate change. Losing arable land, China faces stark choice: adapt or go hungry. Science, 339(6120): 644–645
Lefroy E, Rydberg T (2003). Emergy evaluation of three cropping systems in southwestern Australia. Ecol Modell, 161(3): 195–211
Li L, Lu H, Campbell D E, Ren H (2011a). Methods for estimating the uncertainty in emergy table-form models. Ecol Modell, 222(15): 2615–2622
Li L, Lu H, Ren H, Kang W, Chen F (2011b). Emergy evaluations of three aquaculture systems on wetlands surrounding the Pearl River Estuary, China. Ecol Indic, 11(2): 526–534
Lima J S G, Rivera E C, Focken U (2012). Emergy evaluation of organic and conventional marine shrimp farms in Guaraira Lagoon, Brazil. J Clean Prod, 35: 194–202
Lu H F, Bai Y, Ren H, Campbell D E (2010). Integrated emergy, energy and economic evaluation of rice and vegetable production systems in alluvial paddy fields: implications for agricultural policy in China. J Environ Manage, 91(12): 2727–2735
Lu H F, Kang WL, Campbell D E, Ren H, Tan Y W, Feng R X, Luo J T, Chen F P (2009). Emergy and economic evaluations of four fruit production systems on reclaimed wetlands surrounding the Pearl River Estuary, China. Ecol Eng, 35(12): 1743–1757
Lv C M, Wu Z N (2009). Emergy analysis of regional water ecological-economic system. Ecol Eng, 35(5): 703–710
Martin J F, Diemont S A W, Powell E, Stanton M, Levy-Tacher S (2006). Emergy evaluation of the performance and sustainability of three agricultural systems with different scales and management. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 115(1–4): 128–140
Mayer A L (2008). Strengths and weaknesses of common sustainability indices for multidimensional systems. Environ Int, 34(2): 277–291
Odum H T (1996). Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making. New York: John Wiley & Sons
Odum H T (2000). Handbook of Emergy Evaluation. Folio# 2, Emergy of Global Processes. Handbook of Emergy Evaluation. Center for Environmental Policy, Environmental Engineering Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, 30
Odum H T, Brown M T, Brandt-Williams S (2000). Handbook of Emergy Evaluation. Folio# 1: Introduction and Global Budget. Center for Environmental Policy, Environmental Engineering Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville
Odum H T, Odum E C (2000). Modeling for All Scales: An Introduction to System Simulation. Academic Press
Ortega E, Cavalett O, Bonifácio R, Watanabe M (2005). Brazilian soybean production: emergy analysis with an expanded scope. Bull Sci Technol Soc, 25(4): 323–334
Özerol G, Bressers H, Coenen F (2012). Irrigated agriculture and environmental sustainability: an alignment perspective. Environ Sci Policy, 23: 57–67
Patterson M G (2002). Ecological production based pricing of biosphere processes. Ecol Econ, 41(3): 457–478
Pimentel D, Pimentel M H (2007). Food, Energy, and Society (3rd Edition). CRC
Playán E, Mateos L (2006). Modernization and optimization of irrigation systems to increase water productivity. Agric Water Manage, 80(1–3): 100–116
Pulselli F M, Patrizi N, Focardi S (2011). Calculation of the unit emergy value of water in an Italian watershed. Ecol Modell, 222(16): 2929–2938
Reca J, Roldán J, Alcaide M, Lopez R, Camacho E (2001). Optimisation model for water allocation in deficit irrigation systems: I. Description of the model. Agric Water Manage, 48(2): 103–116
Rugani B, Benetto E (2012). Improvements to Emergy evaluations by using Life Cycle Assessment. Environ Sci Technol, 46(9): 4701–4712
Rydberg T, Haden A C (2006). Emergy evaluations of Denmark and Danish agriculture: assessing the influence of changing resource availability on the organization of agriculture and society. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 117(2–3): 145–158
Sciubba E, Ulgiati S (2005). Emergy and exergy analyses: complementary methods or irreducible ideological options? Energy, 30(10): 1953–1988
Seyam I, Hoekstra A, Savenije H (2002). Calculation methods to assess the value of upstream water flows and storage as a function of downstream benefits. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 27(11–22): 977–982
Shao L, Wu Z, Zeng L, Chen ZM, Zhou Y, Chen G Q (2013). Embodied energy assessment for ecological wastewater treatment by a constructed wetland. Ecol Modell, 252: 63–71
Shen D J, Liang R J, Wang H (1999). Water Pricing in Theory and Practice. Beijing: Science Press
Tsadilas C, Vakalis P (2003). Economic benefit from irrigation of cotton and corn with treated wastewater. Water supply, 3(4): 223–229
Ulgiati S, Brown M T (1998). Monitoring patterns of sustainability in natural and man-made ecosystems. Ecol Modell, 108(1–3): 23–36
Voora V, Thrift C (2010). Using Emergy to Value Ecosystem Goods and Services. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development, Canada
Wezel A, Bellon S, Doré T, Francis C, Vallod D, David C (2009). Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A review. Agronomy For Sustainable Development, 29(4): 503–515
Xi Y G, Qin P (2009). Emergy evaluation of organic rice-duck mutualism system. Ecol Eng, 35(11): 1677–1683
Yan M C, Odum H T (2001). New Visual Angle to View Eco-economic System Emergy Evaluation Case Studies of Chinese Regional Ecoeconomic System. Beijing: China Zhigong Publishing House
Zhang L X, Ulgiati S, Yang Z F, Chen B (2011). Emergy evaluation and economic analysis of three wetland fish farming systems in Nansi Lake area, China. J Environ Manage, 92(3): 683–694
Zhang L X, Song B, Chen B (2012). Emergy-based analysis of four farming systems: insight into agricultural diversification in rural China. J Clean Prod, 28(0): 33–44
Zhang L X, Yang Z F, Chen G Q (2007). Emergy analysis of cropping-grazing system in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China. Energy Policy, 35 (7): 3843–3855
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, D., Luo, Z., Webber, M. et al. Emergy evaluation of the contribution of irrigation water, and its utilization, in three agricultural systems in China. Front. Earth Sci. 8, 325–337 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-013-0394-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-013-0394-7