Skip to main content
Log in

Emergy evaluation of the contribution of irrigation water, and its utilization, in three agricultural systems in China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Earth Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Emergy theory and method are used to evaluate the contribution of irrigation water, and the process of its utilization, in three agricultural systems. The agricultural systems evaluated in this study were rice, wheat, and oilseed rape productions in an irrigation pumping district of China. A corresponding framework for emergy evaluation and sensitivity analysis methods was proposed. Two new indices, the fraction of irrigation water (FIW), and the irrigation intensity of agriculture (IIA), were developed to depict the contribution of irrigation water. The calculated FIW indicated that irrigation water used for the rice production system (34.7%) contributed more than irrigation water used for wheat (5.3%) and oilseed rape (11.2%) production systems in a typical dry year. The wheat production with an IIA of 19.0 had the highest net benefit from irrigation compared to the rice (2.9) and oilseed rape (8.9) productions. The transformities of the systems’ products represented different energy efficiencies for rice (2.50E + 05 sej·J−1), wheat (1.66E + 05 sej·J−1) and oilseed rape (2.14E + 05 sej·J−1) production systems. According to several emergy indices, of the three systems evaluated, the rice system had the greatest level of sustainability. However, all of them were less sustainable than the ecological agricultural systems. A sensitivity analysis showed that the emergy inputs of irrigation water and nitrogenous fertilizer were the highest sensitivity factors influencing the emergy ratios. Best Management Practices, and other agroecological strategies, could be implemented to make further improvements in the sustainability of the three systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agostinho F, Diniz G, Siche R, Ortega E (2008). The use of emergy assessment and the Geographical Information System in the diagnosis of small family farms in Brazil. Ecol Modell, 210(1–2): 37–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amekawa Y, Sseguya H, Onzere S, Carranza I (2010). Delineating the multifunctional role of agroecological practices: toward sustainable livelihoods for smallholder farmers in developing countries. J Sustain Agric, 34(2): 202–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton D N (2002). The transferability of benefit transfer: contingent valuation of water quality improvements in Costa Rica. Ecol Econ, 42(1–2): 147–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastianoni S, Marchettini N, Panzieri M, Tiezzi E (2001). Sustainability assessment of a farm in the Chianti area (Italy). J Clean Prod, 9(4): 365–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blamey R, Gordon J, Chapman R (1999). Choice modelling: assessing the environmental values of water supply options. Aust J Agric Resour Econ, 43(3): 337–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt-Williams S L (2002). Handbook of Emergy Evaluation. Folio# 4. Emergy of Florida Agriculture (2nd printing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Environmental Policy, Environmental Engineering Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL

  • Brown M, Bardi E (2001). Handbook of Emergy Evaluation. Folio# 3: Emergy of Ecosystems. Center for Environmental Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown M T, Martínez A, Uche J (2010). Emergy analysis applied to the estimation of the recovery of costs for water services under the European Water Framework Directive. Ecol Modell, 221(17): 2123–2132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown M T, McClanahan T (1996). Emergy analysis perspectives of Thailand and Mekong River dam proposals. Ecol Modell, 91(1–3): 105–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown M T, Ulgiati S (1997). Emergy-based indices and ratios to evaluate sustainability: monitoring economies and technology toward environmentally sound innovation. Ecol Eng, 9(1–2): 51–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buenfil A A (2001). Emergy evaluation of water. Dissertation for Ph.D Degree. Gainesville: University of Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalett O, Queiroz J F, Ortega E (2006). Emergy assessment of integrated production systems of grains, pig and fish in small farms in the South Brazil. Ecol Modell, 193(3–4): 205–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen B, Chen G (2006). Ecological footprint accounting based on emergy-A case study of the Chinese society. Ecol Modell, 198(1–2): 101–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen B, Chen G Q (2009). Emergy-based energy and material metabolism of the Yellow River basin. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul, 14(3): 923–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen B, Chen Z, Zhou Y, Zhou J, Chen G (2009a). Emergy as embodied energy based assessment for local sustainability of a constructed wetland in Beijing. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul, 14(2): 622–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen D, Chen J, Luo Z H (2012). Communications on emergy indices of regional water ecological-economic system. Ecol Eng, 46: 116–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen D, Chen J, Luo Z H, Lv Z W (2009b). Emergy evaluation of the natural value of water resources in Chinese rivers. Environ Manage, 44(2): 288–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen D, Chen J, Lv ZW, Chen X (2008). A quantitative analysis method in water sciences research: emergy theory and method. Journal of China Three Gorges University(Natural Sciences), 30(2): 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen D, Luo Z H, Webber M, Chen J, Wang W G (2013). Emergy evaluation of a pumping irrigation water production system in China. Frontiers of Earth Science, doi: 10.1007/s11707-013-0367-x

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen D, Webber M, Chen J, Luo Z H (2011). Emergy evaluation perspectives of an irrigation improvement project proposal in China. Ecol Econ, 70(11): 2154–2162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen G Q, Jiang M M, Chen B, Yang Z F, Lin C (2006). Emergy analysis of Chinese agriculture. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 115(1–4): 161–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S Q, Chen B (2011). Assessing inter-city ecological and economic relations: an emergy-based conceptual model. Frontiers of Earth Science, 5(1): 97–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S Q, Chen B (2012). Sustainability and future alternatives of biogas-linked agrosystem (BLAS) in China: an emergy synthesis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 16(6): 3948–3959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor J D, Schwabe K, King D, Knapp K (2012). Irrigated agriculture and climate change: the influence of water supply variability and salinity on adaptation. Ecol Econ, 77: 149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill R V, Paruelo J, Raskin R G, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1998). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecol Econ, 25(1): 3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Barros I, Blazy J M, Rodrigues G S, Tournebize R, Cinna J P (2009). Emergy evaluation and economic performance of banana cropping systems in Guadeloupe (FrenchWest Indies). Agric Ecosyst Environ, 129(4): 437–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faux J, Perry G M (1999). Estimating irrigation water value using hedonic price analysis: a case study in Malheur County, Oregon. Land Econ, 75(3): 440–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gohar A A, Ward F A, Amer S A (2013). Economic performance of water storage capacity expansion for food security. J Hydrol (Amst), 484: 16–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hau J L, Bakshi B R (2004). Promise and problems of emergy analysis. Ecol Modell, 178(1–2): 215–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Q, Rozelle S, Lohmar B, Huang J, Wang J (2006). Irrigation, agricultural performance and poverty reduction in China. Food Policy, 31(1): 30–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain I, Sial M H, Hussain Z, Akram W (2009). Economic value of irrigation water: evidence from a Punjab Canal. Lahore Journal of Economics, 14(1): 69–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain I, Turral H, Molden D, Ahmad M D (2007). Measuring and enhancing the value of agricultural water in irrigated river basins. Irrig Sci, 25(3): 263–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingwersen W W (2010). Uncertainty characterization for emergy values. Ecol Modell, 221(3): 445–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jabeen S, Ashfaq M, Baig A (2006). Linear program modeling for determining the value of irrigation water. J Agric Soc Sci, 2(2): 101–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang M M, Chen B, Zhou J B, Tao F R, Li Z, Yang Z F, Chen G Q (2007). Emergy account for biomass resource exploitation by agriculture in China. Energy Policy, 35(9): 4704–4719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang W L (1998). The research of value-model assessment about value of water resource. Journal of natural resources, 1: 35–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang D, Park S S (2002). Emergy evaluation perspectives of a multipurpose dam proposal in Korea. J Environ Manage, 66(3): 293–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim C, Schaible G D (2000). Economic benefits resulting from irrigation water use: theory and an application to groundwater use. Environ Resour Econ, 17(1): 73–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Rosa A, Siracusa G, Cavallaro R (2008). Emergy evaluation of Sicilian red orange production. A comparison between organic and conventional farming. J Clean Prod, 16(17): 1907–1914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan S F, Qin P, Lu H F (2002). Emergy Analysis of Eco-economic System. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson C (2013). Climate change. Losing arable land, China faces stark choice: adapt or go hungry. Science, 339(6120): 644–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefroy E, Rydberg T (2003). Emergy evaluation of three cropping systems in southwestern Australia. Ecol Modell, 161(3): 195–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Lu H, Campbell D E, Ren H (2011a). Methods for estimating the uncertainty in emergy table-form models. Ecol Modell, 222(15): 2615–2622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Lu H, Ren H, Kang W, Chen F (2011b). Emergy evaluations of three aquaculture systems on wetlands surrounding the Pearl River Estuary, China. Ecol Indic, 11(2): 526–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima J S G, Rivera E C, Focken U (2012). Emergy evaluation of organic and conventional marine shrimp farms in Guaraira Lagoon, Brazil. J Clean Prod, 35: 194–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu H F, Bai Y, Ren H, Campbell D E (2010). Integrated emergy, energy and economic evaluation of rice and vegetable production systems in alluvial paddy fields: implications for agricultural policy in China. J Environ Manage, 91(12): 2727–2735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu H F, Kang WL, Campbell D E, Ren H, Tan Y W, Feng R X, Luo J T, Chen F P (2009). Emergy and economic evaluations of four fruit production systems on reclaimed wetlands surrounding the Pearl River Estuary, China. Ecol Eng, 35(12): 1743–1757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lv C M, Wu Z N (2009). Emergy analysis of regional water ecological-economic system. Ecol Eng, 35(5): 703–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin J F, Diemont S A W, Powell E, Stanton M, Levy-Tacher S (2006). Emergy evaluation of the performance and sustainability of three agricultural systems with different scales and management. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 115(1–4): 128–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer A L (2008). Strengths and weaknesses of common sustainability indices for multidimensional systems. Environ Int, 34(2): 277–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum H T (1996). Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making. New York: John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum H T (2000). Handbook of Emergy Evaluation. Folio# 2, Emergy of Global Processes. Handbook of Emergy Evaluation. Center for Environmental Policy, Environmental Engineering Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, 30

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum H T, Brown M T, Brandt-Williams S (2000). Handbook of Emergy Evaluation. Folio# 1: Introduction and Global Budget. Center for Environmental Policy, Environmental Engineering Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum H T, Odum E C (2000). Modeling for All Scales: An Introduction to System Simulation. Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega E, Cavalett O, Bonifácio R, Watanabe M (2005). Brazilian soybean production: emergy analysis with an expanded scope. Bull Sci Technol Soc, 25(4): 323–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özerol G, Bressers H, Coenen F (2012). Irrigated agriculture and environmental sustainability: an alignment perspective. Environ Sci Policy, 23: 57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson M G (2002). Ecological production based pricing of biosphere processes. Ecol Econ, 41(3): 457–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Pimentel M H (2007). Food, Energy, and Society (3rd Edition). CRC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Playán E, Mateos L (2006). Modernization and optimization of irrigation systems to increase water productivity. Agric Water Manage, 80(1–3): 100–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulselli F M, Patrizi N, Focardi S (2011). Calculation of the unit emergy value of water in an Italian watershed. Ecol Modell, 222(16): 2929–2938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reca J, Roldán J, Alcaide M, Lopez R, Camacho E (2001). Optimisation model for water allocation in deficit irrigation systems: I. Description of the model. Agric Water Manage, 48(2): 103–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugani B, Benetto E (2012). Improvements to Emergy evaluations by using Life Cycle Assessment. Environ Sci Technol, 46(9): 4701–4712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydberg T, Haden A C (2006). Emergy evaluations of Denmark and Danish agriculture: assessing the influence of changing resource availability on the organization of agriculture and society. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 117(2–3): 145–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sciubba E, Ulgiati S (2005). Emergy and exergy analyses: complementary methods or irreducible ideological options? Energy, 30(10): 1953–1988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyam I, Hoekstra A, Savenije H (2002). Calculation methods to assess the value of upstream water flows and storage as a function of downstream benefits. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 27(11–22): 977–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao L, Wu Z, Zeng L, Chen ZM, Zhou Y, Chen G Q (2013). Embodied energy assessment for ecological wastewater treatment by a constructed wetland. Ecol Modell, 252: 63–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen D J, Liang R J, Wang H (1999). Water Pricing in Theory and Practice. Beijing: Science Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsadilas C, Vakalis P (2003). Economic benefit from irrigation of cotton and corn with treated wastewater. Water supply, 3(4): 223–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulgiati S, Brown M T (1998). Monitoring patterns of sustainability in natural and man-made ecosystems. Ecol Modell, 108(1–3): 23–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voora V, Thrift C (2010). Using Emergy to Value Ecosystem Goods and Services. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Wezel A, Bellon S, Doré T, Francis C, Vallod D, David C (2009). Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A review. Agronomy For Sustainable Development, 29(4): 503–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xi Y G, Qin P (2009). Emergy evaluation of organic rice-duck mutualism system. Ecol Eng, 35(11): 1677–1683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan M C, Odum H T (2001). New Visual Angle to View Eco-economic System Emergy Evaluation Case Studies of Chinese Regional Ecoeconomic System. Beijing: China Zhigong Publishing House

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L X, Ulgiati S, Yang Z F, Chen B (2011). Emergy evaluation and economic analysis of three wetland fish farming systems in Nansi Lake area, China. J Environ Manage, 92(3): 683–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L X, Song B, Chen B (2012). Emergy-based analysis of four farming systems: insight into agricultural diversification in rural China. J Clean Prod, 28(0): 33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L X, Yang Z F, Chen G Q (2007). Emergy analysis of cropping-grazing system in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China. Energy Policy, 35 (7): 3843–3855

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhaohui Luo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, D., Luo, Z., Webber, M. et al. Emergy evaluation of the contribution of irrigation water, and its utilization, in three agricultural systems in China. Front. Earth Sci. 8, 325–337 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-013-0394-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-013-0394-7

Keywords

Navigation