Extraperitoneal vs. transperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with a history of prior inguinal hernia repair with mesh

Abstract

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) may be performed via an extraperitoneal (eRARP) or transperitoneal (tRARP) approach. There are no published studies comparing these two methods in patients with a history of prior inguinal hernia repair with mesh (IHRm), but the latter is often advocated in this setting. A retrospective review of patients who underwent RARP with prior IHRm who had a minimum follow-up of 3 months from July 1, 2003 to December 31, 2014 was undertaken. Of 2927 patients who underwent RARP for primary treatment of adenocarcinoma of the prostate, 286 patients had a clear history of IHRm. Of these, 116 patients underwent eRARP and 170 patients underwent tRARP. No differences were noted between the groups with respect to age, body mass index or American Society of Anesthesiology score. Patients in the tRARP group had higher D’Amico risk classification scores (p < 0.0001) and as such, underwent less nerve-sparing procedures (p < 0.0001) and had a higher rate of concomitant pelvic lymph node dissections (p < 0.0001). The tRARP group had a higher incidence of laparoscopic and bilateral IHRm. On univariate analysis, EBL was lower in the tRARP group (172.41 vs. 201.98, p = 0.05) but all other parameters were similar. After controlling for covariates using regression analysis with model selection, a trend was noted towards lower operating room time in the tRARP group (p = 0.0624) but no other differences were noted. The presence of prior IHRm does not seem to be a contraindication to eRARP. OR time may be lower with tRARP (trend) but all other quality indicators studied were similar.