Skip to main content
Log in

Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is less stressful than the open approach: results of a contemporary prospective study evaluating pathophysiology of cortisol stress-related kinetics in prostate cancer surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of prostate cancer (PCA) surgery on the stress system and to identify potential independent factors associating with stress recovery. The design of the study was prospective and PCA surgery included robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) or retro pubic radical prostatectomy. Between February and December 2013, 151 consecutive patients were evaluated. The effects of PCA surgery on the stress system were measured by cortisol serum levels before and after surgery on post-operative day (POD) 0, 1, 3, 5 and 45. Statistical methods were applied. RARP was performed in 71 % of cases. PCA surgery triggered the stress system which immediately (POD 0) responded by cortisol overproduction which induced the negative feedback mechanism that started on POD 1, continued on POD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel R et al (2012) Cancer Statistic. Cancer J Clin 62(1):10–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferlay J et al (2007) Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Ann Oncol 18(3):581–592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Heidenreich A, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, Mason M, Matveev V, Mottet N, Schmid HP, van der Kwast T, Wegel T, Zattoni F (2011) European association of urology. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localized disease. Eur Urol 59(1):61–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mullins JK, Feng Z, Trock BJ, Epstein JI, Walsh PC, Loeb S (2012) The impact of anatomical radical prostatectomy on cancer control: the 30-year anniversary. J Urol 188(6):2219–2224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Montorsi F, Wilson TG, Rosen RC, Ahlering TE, Artibani W, Carrol PR, Eastham JA, Ficarra V, Guazzoni G, Menon M, Novara G, Patel VR, Stolzenburg JU, Van der Poel H, Van Poppel H, Mottrie A (2012) Pasadena consensus panel. Eur Urol 62(3):368–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ni Choileain N, Redmond HP (2006) Cell response to surgery. Arch Surg 141(11):1132–1140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chrousos GP, Gold PW (1992) The concepts of stress and stress system disorders. Overview of physical and behavioral homeostasis. JAMA 267(9):1244–1252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsigos C, Chrousos GP (2002) Hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, neuroendocrine factors and stress. J Psychosom Res 53:865–871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gibbison B, Angelini GD, Lightman L (2013) Dynamic output and control of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in critical illness and major surgery. Br J Anesth 111(3):347–360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fracalanza S, Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Galfano A, Novara G, Mangano A, Plebani M, Artibani W (2008) Is robotically assisted laparoscopic radically prostatectomy less invasive than retropubic radical prostatectomy? Results from a prospective, unrandomized, comparative study. BJU Int 101:1145–1149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody J (2003) The VIP Team. Vattikuti institute prostatectomy technique. J Urol 169:2289–2292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Walsh PC (2002) Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED, Wein AJ (eds) Campbell’s Urology, 8th edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 3107–3129

    Google Scholar 

  13. D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Shultz D, Blank K, Broderick GA, Tomaszewski JE, Renshaw AA, Kaplan I, Beard CJ, Wein A (1998) Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 280(11):969–974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Briganti A, Larcher A, Abdollah F, Capitanio U, Gallina A, Suardi N, Bianchi M, Sun M, Freschi M, Salonia A, Karakiewicz PI, Rigatti P, Montorsi F (2012) Updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection: the essential importance of percentage of positive cores. Eur Urol 61(3):480–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dripps RD, Lamont A, Eckenhoff J (1961) The role of anesthesia in surgical mortality. JAMA 178(3):261–263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Clavien PA et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Flemming ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE, Hutte RVP, Kennedy BJ, Murphy GP, O’Sullivan B, Sobin LH, Yarbro JN (eds) (1997) American joint committee on cancer staging manual, 5th edn. JP Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 219–222

  18. Roberts FS, Roberts WL (2004) Performance characteristics of five automated serum cortisol immunoassays. Clin Biochem 37:489–493

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eisold S, Mehrabi A, Konstantinidis L, Mieth M, Hinz H, Kashfi A, Fonouni H, Muller-Stich BP, Gebhard MM, Schmidt J, Buchler MW, Gutt CN (2008) Experimental study of cardiorespiratory stress factors in esophageal surgery using robot-assisted thoracoscopic or open thoracic approach. Arch Surg 143(2):156–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio B. Porcaro.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Porcaro AB, Molinari A, Terrin A, De Luyk N, Baldassarre R, Brunelli M, Cavalleri S, Cerruto MA, Gelati M, Salvagno GL, Guidi GC and Artibani W declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Porcaro, A.B., Molinari, A., Terrin, A. et al. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is less stressful than the open approach: results of a contemporary prospective study evaluating pathophysiology of cortisol stress-related kinetics in prostate cancer surgery. J Robotic Surg 9, 249–255 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-015-0522-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-015-0522-3

Keywords

Navigation