Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Robotic versus laparoscopic resection for sigmoid diverticulitis with fistula

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Robotic abdominal surgery is growing despite a paucity of clinical reports to evaluate its impact on patient outcomes. In this retrospective case series, we aim to analyze our early experience with robotic resection in 11 consecutive patients with chronic colonic diverticulitis complicated by fistula to bladder, vagina, or skin and to compare the results of the robotic approach to 20 patients undergoing laparoscopic resection for the same indication. Our main outcome measures include operative time, blood loss, conversion rate, transfusion rate, hospital length of stay, complications, readmission, and fistula healing rate. In our study, we found robotic resection for colonic diverticulitis with fistula was technically feasible and yielded 100 % fistula healing rate. The operative time, complication and readmission rates were similar to laparoscopy. A higher conversion rate, diverting stoma need, and longer hospital length of stay were noted in the robotic group; however, these findings could have been attributed to a higher number of cases involving rectal excision in the robotic group. Larger studies are needed to further examine the impact of robotic surgery on the outcome of patients with complicated chronic sigmoid diverticulitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peery AF, Dellon ES, Lund J, Crockett SD, McGowan CE, Bulsiewicz WJ, Gangarosa LM, Thiny MT, Stizenberg K, Morgan DR, Ringel Y, Kim HP, Dibonaventura MD, Carroll CF, Allen JK, Cook SF, Sandler RS, Kappelman MD, Shaheen NJ (2012) Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update. Gastroenterology 143(5):1179–1187. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2012.08.002 e1171–1173

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Etzioni DA, Mack TM, Beart RW Jr, Kaiser AM (2009) Diverticulitis in the United States: 1998–2005: changing patterns of disease and treatment. Ann Surg 249(2):210–217. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181952888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Woods RJ, Lavery IC, Fazio VW, Jagelman DG, Weakley FL (1988) Internal fistulas in diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 31(8):591–596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zehetner J, Szabo K, Wayand W, Shamiyeh A (2009) Lessons learned from the analysis of 200 laparoscopic sigmoid resections for diverticulitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19(2):123–127. doi:10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181a091eb

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Franklin ME Jr, Dorman JP, Jacobs M, Plasencia G (1997) Is laparoscopic surgery applicable to complicated colonic diverticular disease? Surg Endosc 11(10):1021–1025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Berthou JC, Charbonneau P (1999) Elective laparoscopic management of sigmoid diverticulitis. Results in a series of 110 patients. Surg Endosc 13(5):457–460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kockerling F, Schneider C, Reymond MA, Scheidbach H, Scheuerlein H, Konradt J, Bruch HP, Zornig C, Kohler L, Barlehner E, Kuthe A, Szinicz G, Richter HA, Hohenberger W (1999) Laparoscopic resection of sigmoid diverticulitis. Results of a multicenter study. Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group. Surg Endosc 13(6):567–571

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Smadja C, Sbai Idrissi M, Tahrat M, Vons C, Bobocescu E, Baillet P, Franco D (1999) Elective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Results of a prospective study. Surg Endosc 13(7):645–648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Letarte F, Hallet J, Drolet S, Charles Gregoire R, Bouchard A, Gagne JP, Thibault C, Bouchard P (2013) Laparoscopic emergency surgery for diverticular disease that failed medical treatment: a valuable option? Results of a retrospective comparative cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum 56(12):1395–1402. doi:10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182a760b6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Abbass MA, Tsay AT, Abbas MA (2013) Laparoscopic resection of chronic sigmoid diverticulitis with fistula. JSLS 17(4):636–640. doi:10.4293/108680813X13693422520512

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Royds J, O’Riordan JM, Eguare E, O’Riordan D, Neary PC (2012) Laparoscopic surgery for complicated diverticular disease: a single-centre experience. Colorectal Dis 14(10):1248–1254. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02924.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liao G, Zhao Z, Lin S, Li R, Yuan Y, Du S, Chen J, Deng H (2014) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials. World J Surg Oncol 12:122. doi:10.1186/1477-7819-12-122

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim CW, Kim CH, Baik SH (2014) Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 18(4):816–830. doi:10.1007/s11605-014-2469-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mirnezami AH, Mirnezami R, Venkatasubramaniam AK, Chandrakumaran K, Cecil TD, Moran BJ (2010) Robotic colorectal surgery: hype or new hope? A systematic review of robotics in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 12(11):1084–1093. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01999.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vennix S, Pelzers L, Bouvy N, Beets GL, Pierie JP, Wiggers T, Breukink S (2014) Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD005200. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005200.pub3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bordeianou L, Rattner D (2010) Is laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis the new gold standard? Gastroenterology 138(7):2213–2216. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2010.04.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW Jr, Hellinger M, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Nelson H, Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246(4):655–662. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318155a762 (discussion 655–662)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ragupathi M, Ramos-Valadez DI, Patel CB, Haas EM (2011) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for recurrent diverticulitis: experience in consecutive cases and a review of the literature. Surg Endosc 25(1):199–206. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1159-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Maciel V, Lujan HJ, Plasencia G, Zeichen M, Mata W, Jorge I, Lee D, Viamonte M 3rd, Hartmann RF (2014) Diverticular disease complicated with colovesical fistula: laparoscopic versus robotic management. Int Surg 99(3):203–210. doi:10.9738/INTSURG-D-13-00201.1

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Maeso S, Reza M, Mayol JA, Blasco JA, Guerra M, Andradas E, Plana MN (2010) Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 252(2):254–262. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e6239e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Park JS, Choi GS, Park SY, Kim HJ, Ryuk JP (2012) Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy. Br J Surg 99(9):1219–1226. doi:10.1002/bjs.8841

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Xu H, Li J, Sun Y, Li Z, Zhen Y, Wang B, Xu Z (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 12(1):274. doi:10.1186/1477-7819-12-274

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Alasari S, Min BS (2012) Robotic colorectal surgery: a systematic review. ISRN Surg 2012:293894. doi:10.5402/2012/293894

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Elisabeth McLemore would like to disclose the following: Applied Medical: speaking/teaching honorarium, research funding, symposium grant funding. Covidien: consultant honorarium, symposium grant funding. Cubist: speakers bureau, personal stock holding. Ethicon Endosurgery: speaking/teaching honorarium. Genomic Health: speakers bureau. Intuitive Surgical: consultant honorarium, proctor honorarium. Novadaq: speaking/teaching honorarium, consultant honorarium. Novatract: symposium grant funding. Stryker Endoscopy: symposium grant funding.

Conflict of interest

Peter Elliott, Mohmmad Abbass and Maher Abbas declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maher A. Abbas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elliott, P.A., McLemore, E.C., Abbass, M.A. et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic resection for sigmoid diverticulitis with fistula. J Robotic Surg 9, 137–142 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-015-0503-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-015-0503-6

Keywords

Navigation