Skip to main content
Log in

The Reliability of Bariatric Surgery Videos in YouTube Platform

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The growing number of bariatric surgery videos shared on YouTube highlights the need for content and quality assessment. The aim of this study was to answer the question ‘Is watching these videos useful to surgeons and patients?’

Methods

YouTube was searched using the keywords ‘obesity surgery’, ‘bariatric surgery’ and ‘weight loss surgery’, and 100 videos retrieved using each keyword were classified based on their ‘usefulness score’ as very useful, useful and not useful. Video content; source; length and number of views, likes and dislikes were recorded. Upload sources included doctors or hospitals (DH), medical web sites or TV channels (MW), commercial web sites (CW) or civilians (CI). Between-group differences were compared.

Results

Of the 300 videos watched, 175 were included in the study; 53.7% were useful and 24.6% were very useful. There were no between-group differences in the number of likes (p = 0.480), dislikes (p = 0.592) and views (p = 0.104). Most videos were uploaded by MW and DH, also with no significant differences in the number of likes (p = 0.35), dislikes (p = 0.14) and views (p = 0.93). No videos were found with misleading information.

Conclusions

The popularity of bariatric surgery and interest of both patients and surgeons are increasing daily. Although videos on bariatric surgery on YouTube may be more useful than those on other surgical procedures, it is important that the videos are uploaded by medical professionals and that specific upload and retrieval filters are applied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Farnan JM, Paro JA, Higa J, et al. The YouTube generation: implications for medical professionalism. Perspect Biol Med. 2008;51(4):517–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ashraf B. Teaching the Google-eyed YouTube generation. Educ Train. 2009;51(5/6):343–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Potomkova J, Mihal V, Schwarz D. Medical education for YouTube generation. In: Silva A, Pontes E, Guelfi A, Kofuji ST, editors. E-Learning-Engineering. On-Job Training and Interactive Teaching. Rijeka: InTech; 2012. p. 157–176.

  4. Barry DS, Marzouk F, Chulak-Oglu K, et al. Anatomy education for the YouTube generation. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(1):90–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee JS, Seo HS, Hon TH. YouTube as a source of patient information on gallstone disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(14):4066–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Keelan J, Pavri-Garcia V, Tomlinson G, Wilson K. YouTube as a source of information on immunization: a content analysis. JAMA. 2007;298:2482–2484 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.21.2482

  7. Biggs TC, Bird JH, Harries PG, et al. YouTube as a source of information on rhinosinusitis: the good, the bad and the ugly. J Laryngol Otol. 2013;127:749–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215113001473.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Butler DP, Perry F, Shah Z, et al. The quality of video information on burn first aid available on YouTube. Burns. 2013;39(5):856–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2012.10.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Steinberg PL, Wason S, Stern JM, et al. YouTube as source of prostate cancer information. Urology. 2010;75:619–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.urology.2008.07.059.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Strychowsky JE, Nayan S, Farrokhyar F, et al. YouTube: a good source of information on pediatric tonsillectomy? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;77:972–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.03.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brna PM, Dooley JM, Esser MJ, et al. Are YouTube seizure videos misleading? Neurologists do not always agree. Epilepsy Behav. 2013;29:305–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.08.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu KY, Haukoos JS, Sasson C. Availability and quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation information for Spanish-speaking population on the Internet. Resuscitation. 2014;85:131–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.0 8.274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sampson M, Cumber J, Li C, et al. A systematic review of methods for studying consumer health YouTube videos, with implications for systematic reviews. PeerJ. 2013;1:e147. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.147.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Rapp AK, Healy MG, Charlton ME, et al. YouTube is the most frequently used educational video source for surgical preparation. J Surg Educ. 2016;73(6):1072–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Frongia G, Mehrabi A, Fonouni H, et al. YouTube as a potential training resource for laparoscopic fundoplication. J Surg Educ. 2016;73(6):1066–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdullah Sisik.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent does not apply.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Erdem, H., Sisik, A. The Reliability of Bariatric Surgery Videos in YouTube Platform. OBES SURG 28, 712–716 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2911-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2911-3

Keywords

Navigation