Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison Between Banded and Nonbanded Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass with 2-Year Follow-Up: a Preliminary Retrospective Analysis

  • New Concept
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is one of the most widely used bariatric surgeries for treatment of moderate and severe obesity. Placing a band around the pouch to band the gastric bypass operation has been reported to increase the restriction resulting in better weight loss and weight loss maintenance. A retrospective comparative study of banded versus nonbanded gastric bypass was done to see if banding the pouch made a difference in the weight loss and quality of life outcome in the patients.

Methods

Data from all patients who had a gastric bypass in the year 2012 at our centre were reviewed. They were divided into two groups the banded and the nonbanded groups. Patients with complete 2-year follow-up were analysed in terms of weight loss, weight regain and quality of life changes.

Results

Two hundred ten patients had gastric bypass in 2012; 165 had complete 2-year follow-up; 64 were banded and 101 nonbanded. The preoperative patient profile in terms of weight, gender and comorbid conditions was similar in both groups except the body mass index (BMI) was significantly higher in the banded group. The perioperative and postoperative complication rates were similar. The weight, BMI and percentage excess weight loss (PEWL) at 2 years were 80.93 kg, 29.45 kg/m2 and 60.76 % in the nonbanded group and 77.06 kg, 27.66 kg/m2 and 71.45 % in the banded group, respectively. Resolution of comorbid conditions was the same in both groups. The overall Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index went from 88.98 preoperatively to 109.33 postoperatively in the nonbanded group and 92.5 to 112.81 in the banded group, respectively.

Conclusions

The patients with banded gastric bypass had significantly better results in terms of weight loss, weight stability and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index scores at 2 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Study by Shirley Johanna on April 10, 2015 at 6:53 PM Obesity News.

  2. Gloy V L, Briel M, Bhatt D L, Kashyap S R. Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials 2013; 347 doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5934 (Published 22 October 2013).

  3. Weiner RA et al. Indications and principles of metabolic surgery U.S. Natl Libr Med. 2010;81(4):379–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dixon JB, Zimmet P, Alberti KG, et al. Bariatric surgery: an IDF statement for obese type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2011;28(6):628–42. doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03306.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bariatric Surgical Procedures Sandeep Aggarwal, Santosh Anand Department of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India JIMSA April-June 2013 Vol.26 No. 2.

  6. Griffith PS, Birch DW, Griffith PS, et al. Managing complications associated with laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Can J Surg. 2012;55(5):329–36. doi:10.1503/cjs.002011.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lemmens L, Karcz WK, Bukhari W, et al. Banded gastric bypass—four years follow up in a prospective multicenter analysis. BMC Surg. 2014;14:88. doi:10.1186/1471-2482-14-88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. O’Brien P. Is weight loss more successful after gastric bypass than gastric banding for obese patients? Nat Clin Pract Gastroenerol Hepatol. 2009;6(3):136–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mahawar KK, Parikh C, Carr WR, Jennings N, Balupuri S, Small PK. Primary banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2014;24(10):1771–92. doi:10.1007/s11695-014-1346-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Buchwald H, Buchwald JN, McGlennon TW. Systematic review and meta analysis of medium-term outcomes after banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2014;29(9):1536–51. doi:10.1007/s11695-014-1311-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Daniel D, Dermartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications a New proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336. Patients Results Survey Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S, et al. Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg. 1995;82(2):216–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fobi M, Malgorzata V, Stanczyk J N, Che-Senge K. The banded gastric bypass: principles of metabolic surgery III. Springer pp 227–238 2012 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02411-5_20.

  14. Bessler M, Daud A, Kim T, et al. Prospective randomized trial of banded versus nonbanded gastric bypass for the super obese: early results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3(4):480–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zarate X, Arceo-Olaiz R, Hernandez JM, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing banded versus standard laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:395–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Heneghan HM, Annaberdyev S, Eldar S, et al. Banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(2):210–6. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2013.10.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fobi M, Lee H, Igwe D, et al. Band erosion: incidence, etiology, management and outcome after banded vertical gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2001;11:699–707.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Crampton NA, Izvornokov V, Stubbs RS Silastic ring gastric bypass: results in 64 patients 1997;7; 489–94.

  19. Crampton N A, Izvornikov V. Silastic ring gastric bypass: a comparison of two ring sizes: a preliminary report Obesity Surgery December 1997, Vol 7, Issue 6, pp 495–499 date: 01 dec 1997.

  20. Dykstra MA, Switzer NJ, Sherman V, et al. Roux en Y gastric bypass: how and why it fails? Surg Curr Res. 2014;4:165. doi:10.4172/2161-1076.1000165.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohit Bhandari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. They have not taken any financial support from Bariatec or any other company. The data collection was done independently by the authors.

Statement of Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Statement of Human and Animal Rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the standards of the institution and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhandari, M., Bhandari, S., Mishra, A. et al. Comparison Between Banded and Nonbanded Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass with 2-Year Follow-Up: a Preliminary Retrospective Analysis. OBES SURG 26, 213–218 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1929-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1929-7

Keywords

Navigation