Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patient Preferences and Bariatric Surgery Procedure Selection; the Need for Shared Decision-Making

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for patients suffering from obesity-related comorbidities. There is little data regarding how patients choose one particular bariatric procedure over another. This study aimed to better define the relationship between preferences of patients considering bariatric surgery and the procedure patients undergo.

Methods

A bilingual questionnaire was administered to all prospective patients seen between March 1 and August 31, 2012. The questionnaire assessed basic knowledge of bariatric surgery (based on the information seminar) as well as patient preferences of the various outcomes and complications for sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass, and gastric banding.

Results

One hundred seventy-two patients completed the questionnaire. Fifty-eight percent of patients chose “maximum weight loss” as the most important outcome, and 65 % chose “leak” as the most concerning complication. Subgroup analysis of patients with diabetes revealed that 58 % chose “curing diabetes” as the most important outcome. Nineteen percent of patients were either not sure which procedure they wanted or changed their decision after consultation with the surgeon.

Conclusions

The decision to choose one bariatric procedure over another is complex and is based on factors beyond absolute patient preferences. Although maximum weight loss is a commonly reported preference for patients seeking bariatric surgery, patients with diabetes are more focused on diabetes remission. Most patients have already decided which procedure to undergo prior to surgeon consultation. Patients may benefit from shared decision making, which integrates patient values and preferences along with current medical evidence to assist in the complex bariatric surgery selection process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hutter MM, Schirmer BD, Jones D, et al. First report from the American College of Surgeons Bariatric Surgery Center Network: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has morbidity and effectiveness positioned between the band and the bypass. Ann Surg. 2011;254(3):410–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Tice J, Karliner L, Walsh J, et al. Gastric banding or bypass? A systematic review comparing the two most popular bariatric procedures. Am J Med. 2008;121:885–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gastrointestinal Surgery for Severe Obesity. NIH Consensus Statement, March 25–27, 9 (1991), pp. 1–20.

  5. Nguyen N, Nguyen B, Gebhart A, et al. Changes in the makeup of bariatric surgery: a national increase in the use of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216:252–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Prasad C, Batsis J, Lopez-Jimenez F et al. Risk perception of obesity and bariatric surgery in patients seeking treatment for obesity. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2012 Nov 2.

  7. Kaly P, Orellana S, Torrella T, et al. Unrealistic weight loss expectations in candidates for bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:6–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Apovian C, Huskey K, Chiodi S, et al. Patient factors associated with undergoing laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding vs. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for weight loss. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217:1118–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Parikh M, Dasari M, McMacken M, et al. Does a preoperative medically supervised weight loss program improve bariatric surgery outcomes? A pilot randomized study. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:853–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Arterburn D, Westbrok E, Bogart T, et al. Randomized trial of a video-based patient decision aid for bariatric surgery. Obesity. 2011;19:1669–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Taddeucci R, Madan A, Tichansky D. Band versus bypass: influence of an educational seminar and surgeon visit on patient preference. Surg Obes Rel Dis 2007;452-455.

  12. Ren CJ, Cabrera I, Bajaram K, et al. Factors influencing patient choice for bariatric operation. Obes Surg. 2005;15:202–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Barry M, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making—the pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:780–1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Buchwald H. A bariatric surgery algorithm. Obes Surg. 2002;12:733–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nelson D, Blair K, Martin M. Analysis of obesity-related outcomes and bariatric failure rates with the duodenal switch vs. gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Arch Surg. 2012;147:847–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. DeMaria E, Pate V, Warthen M, et al. Baseline data from American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence using the bariatric outcomes longitudinal database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:347–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Ashish Shaha, Research Data Associate, for his assistance with survey administration.

Conflict of interest disclosure statements

Weinstein, Marascalchi, Spiegel, Saunders, Fagerlin, and Parikh have no conflicts to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manish Parikh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weinstein, A.L., Marascalchi, B.J., Spiegel, M.A. et al. Patient Preferences and Bariatric Surgery Procedure Selection; the Need for Shared Decision-Making. OBES SURG 24, 1933–1939 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1270-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1270-6

Keywords

Navigation