Skip to main content
Log in

Rebanding for Slippage After Gastric Banding: Should We Do It?

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is a commonly performed bariatric procedure. LAGB is frequently complicated by slippage. Possible treatment for slippage is rebanding, but long-term effects are unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate whether rebanding after gastric band slippage is associated with weight loss failure.

Methods

This was a post hoc analysis of a prospectively collected database of 627 consecutive LAGB patients. Rebanding for slippage was performed in 81 patients. The effect of rebanding on weight loss was evaluated by three analyses: (1) in 81 rebanded patients, weight loss was compared before and after rebanding, separately for patients in whom primary LAGB was successful or unsuccessful; (2) 81 rebanded patients were matched to 81 patients without slippage for prognostic variables and compared for weight loss after rebanding; (3) multivariate logistic regression was performed whether rebanding was independently associated with weight loss failure.

Results

The chance of a fair result of rebanding for patients following primary successful (n = 34) and unsuccessful LAGB (n = 22) was 62 and 27 % after median follow-up of 113 and 97 months, respectively. There was no difference in weight loss failure between 81 rebanded patients and 81 matched patients: 54 vs 59 % (P = 0.43). In multivariate analysis, rebanding was not significantly associated with weight loss failure: adjusted odds ratio 1.42; 95 % confidence interval 0.85–2.38; P = 0.18.

Conclusion

In general, rebanding after LAGB has no negative effect on weight loss. However, patients in whom LAGB was unsuccessful prior to rebanding have poor long-term weight loss results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mattar SG. Lifting the unbearable weight of morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2008;247:28–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Allison DB, Fontaine KR, Manson JE, et al. Annual deaths attributable to obesity in the United States. JAMA. 1999;282(16):1530–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fontaine KR, Redden DT, Wang C, et al. Years of life lost due to obesity. JAMA. 2003;289(2):187–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pontiroli AE, Morabito A. Long-term prevention of mortality in morbid obesity through bariatric surgery. a systematic review and meta-analysis of trials performed with gastric banding and gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2011;253(3):484–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Perry CD, Hutter MM, Smith DB, et al. Survival and changes in comorbidities after bariatric surgery. Ann Surg. 2008;247(1):21–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sjöström L, Narbro K, Sjöström CD, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(8):741–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Buchwald H, Oien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2008. Obes Surg. 2009;19(12):1605–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nguyen NT, Slone JA, Nguyen XM, et al. A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for the treatment of morbid obesity: outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg. 2009;250(4):631–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. O’Brien PE, Dixon JB, Laurie C, et al. A prospective randomized trial of placement of the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band: comparison of the perigastric and pars flaccida pathways. Obes Surg. 2005;15(6):820–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. NIH conference. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Consensus Development Conference Panel. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115(12):956–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Belachew M, Legrand M, Vincenti VV, et al. Laparoscopic placement of adjustable silicone gastric band in the treatment of morbid obesity: how to do it. Obes Surg. 1995;5(1):66–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Robinett-Weiss N, Hixson ML, Keir B, et al. The metropolitan height–weight tables: perspectives for use. J Am Diet Assoc. 1984;84(12):1480–1.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schouten R, Japink D, Meesters B, et al. Systematic literature review of reoperations after gastric banding: is a stepwise approach justified? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7:99–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gagner M, Gumbs AA. Gastric banding: conversion to sleeve, bypass, or DS. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(11):1931–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Egan RJ, Monkhouse SJ, Meredith HE, et al. The reporting of gastric band slip and related complications; a review of the literature. Obes Surg. 2011;21(8):1280–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Singhal R, Bryant C, Kitchen M, et al. Band slippage and erosion after laparoscopic gastric banding: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(12):2980–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Iannelli A, Gugenheim J. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, but not rebanding, should be proposed as a rescue procedure for patients with failed laparoscopic gastric banding. Ann Surg. 2005;241(2):383–4.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. de Wit LT, Mathus-Vliegen L, Hey C, et al. Open versus laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding: a prospective randomized trial for treatment of morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 1999;230(6):800–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Van de Laar A, de Caluwe L, Dillemans B. Relative outcome measures for bariatric surgery. Evidence against excess weight loss and excess body mass index loss from a series of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients. Obes Surg. 2011;21(6):763–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wouter W. te Riele.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

te Riele, W.W., van Santvoort, H.C., Boerma, D. et al. Rebanding for Slippage After Gastric Banding: Should We Do It?. OBES SURG 24, 588–593 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-013-1119-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-013-1119-4

Keywords

Navigation