Skip to main content
Log in

Multiple Criteria and Trade-Offs in Environmental Ethics

Comment on “Ethics of Species Research and Preservation” by Rob Irvine

  • Case Studies
  • Published:
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Arrow, K.J., and H. Raynaud. 1986. Social choice and multicriterion decision-making. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callicott, J.B. 1980. Animal liberation: A triangular affair. Environmental Ethics 2(4): 311–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callicott, J.B., L.B. Crowder, and K. Mumford. 1999. Current normative concepts in conservation. Conservation Biology 13(1): 22–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figuera, J., S. Greco, and M. Ehrgott, eds. 2005. Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guha, R. 1989. Radical American environmentalism and wilderness preservation: A third world critique. Environmental Ethics 11(1): 71–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, E. 2003. Nature by design: People, natural process, and ecological restoration. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, R. 2013. Ethics of species research and preservation. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10(2): 261–262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, R.C. 1974. Preference among preferences. Journal of Philosophy 71(13): 377–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L. 1992. Value-focused thinking: A path to creative decisionmaking. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L., and H. Raiffa. 1993. Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules, C.R., and S. Sarkar. 2007. Systematic conservation planning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McShane, K. 2007. Why environmental ethicists shouldn’t give up on intrinsic value. Environmental Ethics 29(1): 43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffett, A., and S. Sarkar. 2006. Incorporating multiple criteria into the design of conservation area networks: A minireview with recommendations. Diversity and Distributions 12(2): 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B.G. 1987. Why preserve natural variety? Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, M.D. 1987. Choices: An introduction to decision theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S. 1999. Wilderness preservation and biodiversity conservation—keeping divergent goals distinct. BioScience 49(5): 405–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S. 2005. Biodiversity and environmental philosophy: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S. 2011. Habitat reconstruction: Moving beyond historical fidelity. In The handbook of the philosophy of science, volume 11: Philosophy of ecology, ed. K. deLaplante, B. Brown, and K.A. Peacock, 327–361. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S. 2012. Environmental philosophy: From theory to practice. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S., R.L. Pressey, D.P. Faith, et al. 2006. Biodiversity conservation planning tools: Present status and challenges for the future. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31: 123–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.R. 1986. Philosophical problems for environmentalism. In The preservation of species: The value of biological diversity, ed. B.G. Norton, 173–194. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1991. Black-capped vireo (Vireo atricapilla) recovery plan. Albuquerque: United States Fish and Wildlife Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vane-Wright, R.I., C.J. Humphries, and P.H. Williams. 1991. What to protect? Systematics and the agony of choice. Biological Conservation 55(3): 235–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Winterfeldt, D., and Edwards, W., 2007. Defining a decision analytic structure. In: Edwards, W., Miles Jr., R. F., von Winterfeldt, D. (Eds.), Advances in Decision Theory: From Foundations to Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 81–103.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to Rob Irvine for comments on an earlier draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sahotra Sarkar.

Additional information

The original article by Rob Irvine, published in the Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 10(2): 261–262, can be located at doi:10.1007/s11673-013-9443-x.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sarkar, S. Multiple Criteria and Trade-Offs in Environmental Ethics. Bioethical Inquiry 10, 533–537 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-013-9475-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-013-9475-2

Keywords

Navigation