Do Physicians’ Legal Duties to Patients Conflict with Public Health Values? The Case of Antibiotic Overprescription
- Carl H. Coleman
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Among the many explanations for antibiotic overprescription, some doctors cite the risk of malpractice liability if they deny a patient's request for an antibiotic and the patient's condition worsens. In this paper, I examine the merits of this concern—i.e., whether physicians could, in fact, face malpractice liability for refusing to prescribe an antibiotic when, from a public health perspective, the use of the antibiotic would be considered inappropriate. I conclude that the potential for liability cannot be dismissed entirely, but the risk is remote—even in cases where there is a chance that the antibiotic might have benefited the patient.
- Ackerman, F (1991) The significance of a wish. Hastings Ctr. Rep 21: pp. 27-30 CrossRef
- Brushwood, DB (2003) Maximizing the value of electronic prescription monitoring programs. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 31: pp. 41-54 CrossRef
- Canterbury v. Spence, 150 U.S. App. D.C. 263, 464 F.2d 772 (D.C. Cir. 1972).
- Coleman, CH (2005) Duties to subjects in clinical research. Vanderbilt Law Review 58: pp. 387-449
- Department of Health and Human Services.2005. Part 46: Protection of Human Subjects. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm. Accessed 4 April 2009.
- Furrow, BR (1997) Managed care organizations and patient injury: Rethinking liability. Georgia Law Review (Athens, Ga.) 31: pp. 419-509
- Gonzales, R (2001) Principles of appropriate antibiotic use for treatment of acute respiratory tract infections in adults: Background, specific aims, and methods. Annals of Internal Medicine 134: pp. 479-486
- Howard, D Patient and physician demand for antibiotics. In: Ramanan, Laxminarayan, Anup, Malani eds. (2007) Extending the Cure: Policy responses to the growing threat of antibiotic resistance. RFF Press, Washington
- Laxminarayan, R., and Malani, A. (Eds.). 2007. Extending the Cure: Policy responses to the growing threat of antibiotic resistance. Washington: RFF Press.
- Meier, B. (2008). Study finds few pain doctors face criminal prosecutions. The New York Times, 20 September, A16.
- Peters, PG (2000) The quiet demise of deference to custom: Malpractice law at the millennium. Washington and Lee Law Review 57: pp. 163-205
- Pope, TM (2007) Medical futility statutes: No safe harbor to unilaterally refuse life-sustaining treatment. Tennessee Law Review 75: pp. 1-80
- Rodwin, MA (1995) Strains in the fiduciary metaphor: Divided physician loyalties and obligations in a changing health care system. American Journal of Law & Medicine 21: pp. 241-257
- Selgelid, MJ (2007) Ethics and drug resistance. Bioethics 21: pp. 218-229 CrossRef
- Solomon, DH (2001) Academic detailing to improve use of broad-spectrum antibiotics at an academic medical center. Archives of Internal Medicine 161: pp. 1897-1902 CrossRef
- Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal.3d 425, 551 P.2d 334 (1976).
- Ziegler, SJ, Lorich, NP (2003) Pain relief, prescription drugs, and prosecution: A four-state survey of chief prosecutors. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 31: pp. 75-100 CrossRef
- Do Physicians’ Legal Duties to Patients Conflict with Public Health Values? The Case of Antibiotic Overprescription
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Volume 6, Issue 2 , pp 181-185
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Carl H. Coleman (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Center for Health & Pharmaceutical Law & Policy, Seton Hall University School of Law, One Newark Center, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA