Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of roughness elements distribution on overland flow resistance

  • Published:
Journal of Mountain Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Roughness elements are various in a mountain area; they include gravel and ground surface vegetation that often result in surface friction drag to resist overland flows. The variation and characteristics of flow resistance strongly impact the overland flow process and watershed floods. In view of the universal existence of natural vegetation, such as Chlorophytum malayense (CM) or Ophiopogon bodinieri (OB), and the sand-gravel bed of the river channel, it is important to understand the role of different types of roughness elements in flow resistance. This study was performed to investigate and compare through flume experiments the behaviors of overland flow resistance by the reaction of multi-scale configuration of different roughness elements. The result showed that the resistance coefficient gradually reduced versus the increase of flow rate in unit width and tended to be a constant when q = 3.0 l/s.m, Fr = 1.0, and Re = 4000 for slopes of 6 to 10 degrees. The gap of the vegetated rough bed and the gravel rough bed is limited to the same as the gap of the two types of vegetation, CM and OB. It was noted that the vegetation contributed to the increase in form resistance negatively and may lead to the mean resistance on decrease. To classify the flow pattern, the laminar flows were described by Darcy- Weisbach’s equation. In the study the f-Re equation of vegetated bed was developed with f = 5000/Re. The friction coefficient for laminar flows can be regarded as the critical value for identifying the transformation point of the flow pattern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aberle J, Järvelä J (2013) Flow resistance of emergent rigid and flexible floodplain vegetation. Journal of Hydraulic Research 51 (1): 33–45. DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2012.754795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahams AD, Parsons AJ, Hirsch PJ (1992) Field and laboratory studies of resistance to interrill overland flow on semiarid hillslopes, southern Arizona. In: Overland Flow: Hydraulics and Erosion Mechanics, Parsons AJ, Abrahams AD (eds). UCL Press, London, UK. pp 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrahams AD, Parsons AJ, Wainwright J (1994) Resistance to overland flow on semiarid grassland and shrubland hillslopes, Walnut Gulch, southern Arizona. Journal of Hydrology 156: 431–446. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694 (94)90088-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros AP, Colello JD (2001) Surface roughness for shallow overland flow on crushed stone surfaces. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering ASCE 127 (1): 38–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C (1976) Flow resistance in broad shallow channels. Journal of the Hydraulics Division 102 (3): 307–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunkerley D, Domelow P, Tooth D (2001) Frictional retardation of laminar flow by plant litter and surface stones on dry land surfaces: a laboratory study. Water Resources Research 37 (5): 1417–1423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmett WW (1970) he hydraulics of overland flow on hillslopes. US Government Printing Office, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih HM, Yang CT (2009) Estimating overland flow erosion capacity using unit stream power. International Journal of Sediment Research 24 (1): 4662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang GH, Shen RC, Luo RT, et al. (2010) Effects of sediment load on hydraulics of overland flow on steep slopes. Earth Surface Processes and Land-forms 35 (15): 1811–1819. DOI: 10.1002/esp.2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilley JE, Finkner SC (1991) Hydraulic roughness coefficients as affected by random roughness. Transaction of the ASAE (34): 897–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gharabaghi B, Rudra RP, Goel PK (2006) Effectiveness of vegetative filter strips in removal of sediments from overland flow. Water Quality Research Journal of Canada 41 (3): 275–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosh JL, Jarrett AR (1994) Interrill erosion and runoff on very steep slopes. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers (USA) 37 (4): 1127–1331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu SX, Abrahams AD (2004) Resistance to overland flow due to bed-load transport on plane mobile beds. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 29 (13): 1691–1701. DOI: 10.1002/esp.1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu SX, Abrahams AD (2005) The effect of bed mobility on resistance to overland flow. Earth Surface Processes and Landform 30 (11):1461–1470. DOI: 10.1002/esp.1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu SX, Abrahams AD (2006) Partitioning the flow resistance to overland flow on rough mobile beds. Earth Surface Processes and Landform 31 (10):1280–1291. DOI: 10.1002/esp.1333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutdoff F (2009) Estimating equivalent roughness lengths based on wake sizes. Water Engineering for a Sustainable Environment, Proceedings of 33rd International Association of Hydraulic Engineering & Research (IAHR) Biennial Congress, Vancouver, Canada (10-14 August 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jing XF, Lu HX, Zhang KD, et al. (2007) Experimental study of overland flow hydromechanics under different degrees of roughness. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation 27 (2): 33–38. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Julien PY (2002) River Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, UK. pp 54–57. ISBN: 9780521529709.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knapen A, Smets T, Poesen J (2009) Flow regarding effects of vegetation and geo-textiles on soil detachment during concentrated flow. Hydrological Processes 23: 2427–2437. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li G (2009) Preliminary study of the interference of surface objects and rainfall in overland flow resistanc. Catena 78: 154–158. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2009.03.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li G, Abrahams AD, Atkinson JF (1996) Correction factors in the determination of mean velocity of overland flow. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 21:509–515. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837 (199606)21:6<509::AID-ESP613>3.0.CO;2-Z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li G, Abrahams AD (1997) Effects of salting sediment load on the determination of the mean velocity of overland flow. Water Resources Research 33 (2): 341–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li RM and Shen HW (1973) Effects of tall vegetation on flow and sediment. Journal of the hydraulics division. 99 (5): 793–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luk SH, Merz W (1992) Use of the salt tracing technique to determine the velocity of overland flow. Soil Technology 5 (4): 289–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munoz-Carpena R, Parsons JE (2005) A design procedure for vegetative filter strips using VFSMOD-W. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 47 (6): 1933–1941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer VJ (1945) A method for designing vegetated waterways. Agriculture Engineering 26 (12): 516–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musleh F and Cruise J (2006) Functional relationships of resistance in wide flood plains with rigid unsubmerged vegetation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) 132 (2):163–171. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429 (2006)132:2 (163)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan CZ, Shangguan ZP (2006) Runoff hydraulic characteristics and sediment generation in sloped grassplots under simulated rainfall conditions. Journal of Hydrology 331 (1-2): 178–185. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.05.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MW, Cox NJ, Bracken LJ (2011) Modeling depth distributions of overland flows. Geomorphology 125 (3): 402–413. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.10.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner AK, Clift TR, Win M, et al. (1978) Discharge-depth equation for shallow flow. Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division 104 (1): 95–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang GY, Liu YH, Wang XH (2012) Experimental investigation of hydrodynamic characteristics of overland flow with geocell. Journal of Hydrodynamics 24 (5): 737–743. DOI: 10.1016/ S1001-6058 (11)60298-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang XK, Yan XF, Zhou SF, et al. (2014) Longitudinal variations of hydraulic characteristics of overland flow with different roughness. Journal of Hydrodynamics 26 (1): 66–74. DOI: 10.1016/S1001-6058 (14)60008-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang XK, Liu TH, Ye L, et al. (2013) Experimental study on the effects of flexible vegetation on hydraulic characteristics and local head losses of overland flow. Journal of Sichuan University (Engineering Science Edition) 45 (2):22–27. (In Chinese) DOI: 10.15961/j.jsuese.2013.02.006

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZH (2005) Numerical simulation of the flow resistance coefficient of pile groups. Master dissertation. Hehai University. pp 28–45. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weltz MA, Arslan, AB, Lane LJ (1992) Hydraulic roughness coefficients for native rangelands. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 118 (5): 776–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu LH, Yang XL (2014) Influence of bending rigidity of submerged vegetation on local flow resistance. Journal of Hydrodynamics 6 (2): 242–249. DOI: 10.1016/S1001-6058(14)60027-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan XF, Zhou SF, Huang E, et al. (2012) Experimental study on the effects of vegetation on hydraulic characteristics of overland flow. Journal of Sichuan University (Engineering Science Edition) 44 (2):26–30. (In Chinese). DOI: 10.15961/j.jsuese.2012.02.002

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang W and Choi SU (2009) Impact of stem flexibility on mean flow and turbulence structure in depth-limited open channel flows with submerged vegetation. Journal of Hydraulic Research 47 (4): 445–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao WY (1996) Experiment study on hydraulic resistance laws of overland sheet flow. Journal of Sediment Research (1): 74–81. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye L, Wang YL, Liu XN, et al. (2014) Experimental study on effects of different artificial vegetation distribution on overland flow, Journal of Sichuan University (Engineering Science Edition) 46 (Supp.2): 42–48. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi ZJ, Yan XF, Huang E, et al. (2011) The calculation of overland flow resistance and hydraulic characteristics along slope distance in a steep experimental flume. Journal of Sichuan University (Engineering Science Edition) 43 (Supp.1): 43–47. (In Chinese) DOI:10.15961/j.jsuese.2011.s1.001

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, China

    Chen Ye, Xing-nian Liu & Xie-kang Wang

Authors
  1. Chen Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xing-nian Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xie-kang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xie-kang Wang.

Additional information

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2047-9293

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8996-7618

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0065-404X

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ye, C., Liu, Xn. & Wang, Xk. Effects of roughness elements distribution on overland flow resistance. J. Mt. Sci. 12, 1145–1156 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-014-3391-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-014-3391-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation