Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of the ecological security in the three gorges reservoir area by using the ecological footprint method

  • Published:
Journal of Mountain Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ecological footprint concept and its calculation models are useful for the measurement of the sustainable level of social and economic development. The ecological security situation of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area (TGRA) was evaluated using this concept in this study. The construction of the Three Gorges Reservoir has led to the change in the ecology and immigration status of TGRA. The ecological footprint method is an important means to study the regional ecological security. Our results suggested that, by excluding the areas for biodiversity conservation (12% of the total land), the ecological footprint per capita was 0.57895 ha, which exceeded the ecological carrying capacity in TGRA. The total ecological deficit was found to be 11,522,193.34 ha, accounting for 95.02% of the ecological carrying capacity. These findings suggested that the ecological security of TGRA was not good. In order to compensate for the ecological deficit, it was essential to introduce natural resources from other regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Castaneda BE (1999) An index of sustainable economic welfare (ISEW) for Chile. Ecological Economic 28:231–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J (2007) Rapid urbanization in China: A real challenge to soil protection and food security. Catena 69(1):1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang SB, Xiao DN, An SQ (2005) Regional ecosecurity pattern in urban area based on land use analysis: A case study in Lanzhou. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 16(12):2284–2290. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiala N (2008) Measuring sustainability: Why the ecological footprint is bad economics and bad environmental science. Ecological Economics 67(4):519–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). FAO Yearbook: Production 1994, Vol.48. FAO, Rome, 1995a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) FAO Yearbook: Forest Production 1993. FAO, Rome, 1995b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) State of World’s Forests. FAO, Rome, 1995c.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grazi F, van den Bergh J CJM, Rietveld P (2007) Spatial welfare economics versus ecological footprint: modeling agglomeration, externalities and trade. Environmental and Resource Economics 38(1):135–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hard P, Barg S (1997) Measuring Sustainable Sevelopment: Review of Current Practices. Occasional Paper Number 17. Industry Canada, Ottawa. pp 1–2, 49–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeroen CJM, van den Bergh, Verbruggen H (1999) Spatial sustainability, trade and indicators: an evaluation of the’ ecological footprint’. Ecological Economics 29(1):61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonathan L (2002) Living Planet Report 2002. WWF International, 2002. pp 6–15.

  • Lieth H, Whittaker RH (1975) The Primary Productivity of the Biosphere. Springer, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen M, Hansson CB, Bond S (2007) On the bioproductivity and land-disturbance metrics of the Ecological Footprint. Ecological Economics 61(1): 6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum HT (1994) Ecological and General Systems. Revised edition. University of Colorado Press, Boulder, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Our Common Futrue (1987) From One Earth to One World: Report of World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED), An Overview by the World Commission on Environment and Development.

  • Qu B, Xie SY, Zou H (2004) Ecological security problems of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area and countermeasures. Ecology and Environmental 13(1):146–148. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Qu GP (2002) The problems of ecological environmental have become a popular subject of country safety. Environmental Protection 5:3–5. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, Ehrlich PR, Ehrlich AH et al. (1986) Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis. BioScience 34(6):368–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M, Rees WE (1996) Our Ecological Footprints: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello P, et al. (1997) Ecological Footprint of Nations: How much nature do they use? How much do they have? Commissioned by the Earth Council for the Forums. International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachernagel M, Lewan L, Hanson CB (1999) Evaluating the use of natural capital with the ecological footprint: applications in Sweden and subregions.Ambio 28(7): 604–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello P, et al. (1999) National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecological Economics 29(3):375–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang WM, Li JM (2001) Plan Sustainable Ecological Footprint Analysis Method. Territorial Economy 6:16–18. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu WZ, Zhao Q, Luo WH et al. (2009) Assessment of ecological safety of Xuzhou City. Territory & Natural Resources Study (2):46–47.

  • Xu ZM, Chen DJ, Zhang ZQ et al. (2002) Calculation and Analysis on Ecological Footprints of China. Acta Pedologica Sinica 39(3):441–445. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao YL, Zhou DS (2005) Urban Ecology. Science Press, Beijing. pp 66–67. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haiming Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, H., Wang, H., Sun, H. et al. Assessment of the ecological security in the three gorges reservoir area by using the ecological footprint method. J. Mt. Sci. 9, 891–900 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-012-2445-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-012-2445-z

Keywords

Navigation