Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Drivers leading to higher food prices: biofuels are not the main factor

  • Invited Review
  • Published:
In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since 2007, the overall rise in food prices in the USA was twice that of the overall inflation rate, led by inflation for poultry and dairy products in particular. Prominent studies have indicated that the main drivers associated with the rise in food prices in the past 3 yr are the increased energy costs (and the trickle-down impact on farm input costs) and the devaluation of the US dollar. However, currently, the impact of crude oil as one of the primary drivers in food prices has waned significantly, as crude oil prices have fallen dramatically since late 2008. The data reviewed here debunk the popular myth that food producers, particularly farmers growing corn or soybean for biofuel feedstocks, are making huge profits with high commodity prices. Producers continue to face extraordinary risks in their farming operations, and profit margins have narrowed considerably because of the high input prices driven by high energy costs. One of the primary solutions to the food price inflation is to increase the supply of commodity crops in a responsible way that is both respectful and sustainable regarding economic, social, and environmental aspects. At the center of this solution is implementing and developing new technologies to increase crop yields and nutritional values without increasing the amount of fossil-based inputs used in agriculture. Conventional breeding, molecular breeding, genomics, and biotechnology are pivotal technologies for increasing crop yields to meet these supply needs, combined with the impacts of other new technologies and best management practices in agricultural production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, P. C.; Hurt, C.; Tyner, W. E. What’s driving food prices? Farm Foundation Issue Report, July 2008, Farm Foundation, Oak Brook, IL, 2008.

  • Aguiba, M. Corn hybridization rate seen to rise to 35%. Manila Bulletin; Tuesday, July 31 2007; http://www.articlearchives.com/agriculture-forestry/agriculture-crop-production-grain/56716-1.html (Accessed on April 04, 2009)

  • Archer, A. Economic impact of biofuel feedstock on rural agricultural economy—the case of rural Arkansas. M.S. thesis, College of Agriculture & Technology, Arkansas State University, Jonesboro; 2008.

  • Baker, A.; Zahniser S. Ethanol reshapes the corn market. Amber Waves 42: 30–35; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. K., Delgado, J. A.; Khosla, R. Precision farming advances agricultural sustainability. V1 Magazine, Sunday, February 10, 2008. http://www.vector1media.com/article/feature/precision-farming-advances-agricultural-sustainability/ (Accessed on April 07, 2009); 2008.

  • Carey, N. Midwest farmland flooding boosts food prices. Reuters, June 17, 2008 article idUSN1346134820080617; 2008

  • Carpenter, J.; Felsot, A.; Goode, T.; Hammig, M.; Onstad, D.; Sankula S. Comparative environmental impacts of biotechnology-derived and traditional soybean, corn and cotton crops. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, Ames, Iowa, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congressional Budget Office (CBO). The impact of ethanol use on food prices and greenhouse-gas emissions. Congress of the United States, Pub. No. 3155, April 2009. http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/100xx/doc10057/04-08-Ethanol.pdf (Accessed on April 10, 2009); 2009.

  • Council for Agriculture Science and Technology (CAST). Convergence of agriculture and energy: Implications for research and policy. CAST Commentary QTA 2006-3/. CAST, Ames, IA; 2006.

  • Delgado, J.; Santos, I. The new food equation: Do EU policies add up?” In: Bruegel Policy Brief. Issue 2008/06, July 2008. http://www.bruegel.org/Public/fileDownload.php?target=/Files/media/PDF/Publications/Policy%20Briefs/pb-2008-06_FINAL.pdf (Accessed on April 01, 2009); 2008.

  • Dobermann, A.; Cassman, K. G. Plant nutrient management for enhanced productivity in intensive grain production systems of the United States and Asia. Plant Soil 247: 153–175; 2002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, J. Farmers could get crop change: A call for fuel may bring cut in grassy field. Boston Globe, October 2, 2006; 2006.

  • Duvick, D. N. Genetic contributions to advances in yield of U.S. maize. Maydica. 37: 69–79; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duvick D. N. Heterosis: Feeding people and protecting natural resources. In: Coors J. G.; Pandey S. (eds) The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Crop Science Society of America, Inc., Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, WI, pp 19–29; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duvick, D. N.; Cassman, K. G. Post-Green Revolution trends in yield potential of temperate maize in the North-Central United States. Crop Sci 39: 1622–1630; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eathington, S. R.; Crosbie, T. M.; Edwards, M. D.; Reiter, R. S.; Bull, J. K. Molecular markers in a commercial breeding program. Crop Sci 47: S–154–S-163; 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economic Research Service of USDA Adoption of genetically engineered crops in the U.S. USDA ERS, Washington, DC. 2008. http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/BiotechCrops/ExtentofAdoptionTable1.htm (Accessed on April 04, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgerton, M. Increasing crop productivity to meet global needs for feed, food, and fuel. Plant Physiol 149: 7–13; 2009.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elobeid, A.; Tokgoz, S.; Hayes, D. J.; Babcock, B. A.; Hart, C. E. The long-run impact of corn-based ethanol on the grain, oilseed, and livestock sectors with implications for biotech crops. AgBioForum 101: 11–18; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, A. E.; Plevin, R. J.; Turner, B. T.; Jones, A. D.; O’Hare, M.; Kammen, D. M. Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science 311: 506–508; 2006.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute—FAPRI. Agricultural Outlook. www.fapri.missouri.edu/outreach/publications/2008/OutlookPub2008.pdf; 2008.

  • Frankel, J. An explanation of soaring commodity prices. VoxEU.org (Accessed on March 25, 2008); 2008.

  • Gould, B. W.; Villarreal, H. J. An assessment of the current structure of food demand in urban China. Agric. Econ. 34: 1–16; 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havran, N. Maintenance as a profit center in a fuel ethanol plant. Ethanol Producer Magazine, March 2006, pp. 60–62; 2006.

  • Henderson, J. What is driving food price inflation? The Main Street Economist 31: 1–5; 2008a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. Are energy prices threatening the farm boom? In AgDM Newsletter, November, 2008, Iowa State University. http://www.extension.iastate.edu/AGDm/articles/others/HenNov08.html; 2008b.

  • Hill, J.; Nelson, E.; Tilman, D.; Polasky, S.; Tiffany, D. Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (U.S.A.) 10330: 11206–11210; 2006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley T. M. Bt resistance management: Experiences from the U.S.. In: Wesseler J. H. H. (ed) Environmental costs and benefits of transgenic crops in Europe. Wageningen UR Frontis Series, Vol. 7. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 81–93; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA. World energy outlook 2004. International Energy Agency, Paris; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF—International Monetary Fund. World economic outlook 2007. April 2007, p. 44. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2007/01/pdf/text.pdf; 2007.

  • James, C. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2007. ISAAA Brief No. 37. ISAAA, Ithaca, NY, pp 1–125; 2007.

  • Johnson, G. R. Process for predicting the phenotypic trait of yield in maize. U.S. Patent 6,455,758; 2002.

  • Johnson, G. R.; Mumm, R. H. Marker assisted maize breeding. Amer. Seed Trade Assoc. Proc. 51st Annual Corn and Sorghum Industry Research Conf. 51:75–84; 1996.

  • Koplow D. Biofuels at what cost?: Government support for ethanol and biodiesel in the United States. The Global Subsidies Initiative (GSI) of the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), Geneva, Switzerland; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, J.; Westhoff, P.; Meyer, S.; Thompson, W. Economic impacts of not extending biofuel subsidies. AgBioForum 102: 94–103; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibtag, E. Corn prices near record high, but what about food costs? Amber Waves 61: 11–15; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCalla, A. World food prices: Causes and consequences. Can. J. Agric. Econ. 571: 23–34; 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, L. What is pushing up crop price. US News and World Report, January 24, 2008. http://www.usnews.com/Topics/tag/Author/l/luke_mullins/index.html (Accessed on November 15, 2008); 2008.

  • National Corn Growers Association. Corn Production Trends 1991–2007, http://www.ncga.com/corn-production-trends (Accessed on April 04, 2009); 2008.

  • Renewable Fuels Association. News Release, April 2, 2007, http://www.ethanolrfa.org/media/press/rfa/2007/view.php?id=1054 (Accessed on February 15, 2008); 2007.

  • Reuter News. Farmer excitement building around soybean economic and yield opportunities. Tuesday, April 22, 2008, 6:04pm EDT. http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS256592+22-Apr-2008+PRN20080422. (Accessed on October 07, 2008); 2008.

  • Rickman, D.; Luvall, J. C.; Shaw, J.; Mask, P.; Kissel, D.; Sullivan, D. Precision agriculture: Changing the face of farming. Geotimes, November 2003. http://www.geotimes.org/nov03/feature_agric.html (Accessed on October 10, 2008); 2003.

  • Russell, W. A. Genetic improvement of maize yields. Adv. Agron. 46: 245–298; 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauser, B. Ethanol demand threatens food prices. Technology Review. February 13, 2007. http://www.technologyreview.com/Energy/18173/ (Accessed on February 15, 2007); 2007.

  • Secchi, S., Babcock, B. A. Impact of high crop prices on environmental quality: A case of Iowa and the Conservation Reserve Program. Working Paper 07-WP 447. Ames, IA: Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University; 2007.

  • Smith, F. B. Corn-based ethanol: A case study in the law of unintended consequences. Competitive Enterprise Institute, June 2007; 2007.

  • Soper, J.; Judd, D.; Schmidt, D.; Sullivan, S. The future of biotechnology in soybeans. AgBioForum 61&2: 8–10; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streifel, S. Impact of China and India on global commodity markets focus on metals and minerals and petroleum. Development Prospects Group World Bank. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTCHIINDGLOECO/Resources/ChinaIndiaCommodityImpact.pdf (Accessed on April 1, 2009); 2009.

  • Stuber, C. W.; Polacco, M.; Senior, M. L. Synergy of empirical breeding, marker-assisted selection, and genomics to increase crop yield potential. Crop Sci. 39: 1571–1583; 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The White House. The Fact Sheet—Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/12/20071219-1.html (Accessed on March 18, 2008); 2007.

  • Tokgoz, S.; Elobeid, A.; Fabiosa, J. F.; Hayes, D. J.; Babcock, B. A., Yu, T. H., Dong, F., Hart C. E., Beghin, J. C. Emerging biofuels: Outlook of effects on U.S. grain, oilseed, and livestock markets. Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications 07-sr101, Ames, IA: FAPRI, Iowa State University; 2007.

  • Trostle, R. Global agricultural supply demand: Factors contributing to the recent increase in food commodity prices. WRS-0801, USDA Economic Research Service; 2008.

  • Troyer, F. A. Adaptedness and heterosis in corn and mule hybrids. Crop Sci. 46: 528–543; 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. Sustainable energy: A framework for decision makers. UN Energy, May 8, 2007; 2007.

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture. USDA Agricultural Projections to 2017. Long-term Projections Report OCE-2008-1; 2008.

  • U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Renewable Fuel Standard Program: Draft Regulatory Impact Analysis. Document No. EPA420-D-06-008, Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, September 2006; 2006.

  • von Braun, J. Poverty, climate change, rising food prices, and the small farmers. PowerPoint presentation given at a meeting of the International Fund for Agricultural Development, April 22, 2008, Rome. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute; 2008.

  • von Lampe, M. Agricultural market impact of future growth in the production of biofuels. Directorate for Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Committee for Agriculture—Working Party on Agricultural Policies and Markets; OECD; AGR/CA/APM(2005)24/FINAL. February 2006; 2006.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Agriculture & Technology, Arkansas State University, P.O. Box 1080, State University, AR, 72467, USA

    Paul Armah, Aaron Archer & Gregory C. Phillips

Authors
  1. Paul Armah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aaron Archer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gregory C. Phillips
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory C. Phillips.

Additional information

Editors: P. Lakshmanan; D. Songstad

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Armah, P., Archer, A. & Phillips, G.C. Drivers leading to higher food prices: biofuels are not the main factor. In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Plant 45, 330–341 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-009-9211-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-009-9211-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation