Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Traditional symbiotic farming technology in China promotes the sustainability of a flooded rice production system

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The excessive use of fertilizers and pesticides required by intensified agriculture has caused a significant damage to the environment. However, deploying effective measures to reduce fertilizer and pesticide use without decreasing grain yield has been challenging. This study reviews the history, benefits, and weaknesses of the classical farming technology in China. We explain how using animals to control and reduce pathogens, pests, and weeds is beneficial, and why the rice-fish/rice-duck (RF/RD) system requires less chemical fertilizer and pesticide. Finally, we present a new planting and breeding model to overcome the weakness of the RF/RD with a ridging design to increase water level for fish/duck. This new model could further improve the economic, social, and ecological benefits of classical farming technology. This study suggests that further development of Chinese traditional rice farming method under the context of the modern intensification of agriculture is of high ecological and economic values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altieri MA (2004) Linking ecologists and traditional farmers in the search for sustainable agriculture. Front Ecol Environ 2:35–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg H (2002) Rice monoculture and integrated rice-fish farming in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam—economic and ecological considerations. Ecol Econ 41:95–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromley DW (2010) Food security: beyond technology. Science 328:169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cai RK, Ni DS, Wang JG (1995) Rice-fish culture in China: the past, present, and future. In: MacKay KT (ed) From: rice-fish culture in China. International Development Research Center, Ottawa, pp 3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng QH, Pan XH (2008) Effects of rice-duck mutualism on diseases insect pests and weeds and economic benefits. Agric Sci Technol 9(1):128–133 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frei M, Becker K (2005a) Integrated rice-fish production and methane emission under greenhouse conditions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 107:51–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frei M, Becker K (2005b) Integrated rice-fish culture: coupled production saves resources. Nat Resour Forum 29:135–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frere MH, Woolhiser DA, Caro JH et al (1977) Control of nonpoint water pollution from agriculture: some concepts. J Soil Water Conserv 32(6):260–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu ZQ, Huang H, Liao XL et al (2008) The effect of ducks on CH4 emission from paddy soil: mechanism research in the rice-duck ecosystem. Acta Ecologica Sinica 28(5):2107–2114 (in Chinese)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gebbers R, Adamchuk VI (2010) Precision agriculture and food security. Science 327:828–831

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • GIAHS (Globally important agricultural heritage systems) (2015a) Rice-fish agriculture. http://www.fao.org/3/a-bp155e.pdf. Accessed July 2015

  • GIAHS (Globally important agricultural heritage systems) (2015b) Dong rice-duck-fish system. http://www.fao.org/3/a-bp152e.pdf. Accessed July 2015

  • Godfray HCJ, Beddington JR, Crute IR et al (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327:812–818

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heong KL, Hardy B (eds) (2009) Planthoppers: new threats to the sustainability of intensive rice production systems in Asia. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrero M, Thornton PK, Notenbaert AM et al (2010) Smart investments in sustainable food production: revisiting mixed crop-livestock systems. Science 327:822–825

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang H, Yang ZH, Wang H et al (2003) A study on the pattern of methane emission in wetland rice-duck complex ecosystems. Acta Ecologica Sinica 23(5):929–934 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Wang H, Huang H et al (2005) Characteristics of methane emission from wetland rice-duck complex ecosystem. Agric Ecosyst Environ 105:181–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC.2007.Climate Change (2007) The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Koohafkan P, Altieri MA (2011) Globally important agricultural heritage systems: a legacy for the future. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumaraswamy S, Rath AK, Ramakrishnan B, Sethunathan N (2000) Wetland rice soils as sources and sinks of methane: a review and prospects for research. Biol Fertil Soils 31:449–461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li CF, Cao CG, Wang JP et al (2008a) Nitrogen losses from integrated rice-duck and rice-fish ecosystems in southern China. Plant Soil 307:207–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li CF, Cao CG, Xu YH et al (2008b) Dynamics of soil microbial biomass N and soil enzymes activities in rice-duck and rice-fish ecosystems. Acta Ecologica Sinica 28(8):3905–3912 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li CF, Cao CG, Zhan M et al (2008c) Nitrous oxide emission from rice-duck complex ecosystem. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 41(9):2895–2901 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li CF, Cao CG, Wang JP et al (2009) Nitrous oxide emissions from wetland rice-duck cultivation systems in Southern China. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 56:21–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu MC, Zhang D, Li WH (2010) Evaluation of comprehensive benefit of rice-fish agriculture and rice mono-cropping-A case study of Qingtian County, Zhejiang Province. Chin J Eco Agric 18(1):164–169 (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty S (2011) Seven billion and counting: what does this mean for global rice food security? Rice Today 10(4):48–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Motarjemi Y, Kaferstein F (1997) Food safety, hazard analysis and critical control point and the increase in foodborne diseases: a paradox? Food Control 10:325–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie J, Gang DD, Benson BC et al (2012) Nonpoint source pollution. Water Environ Res 84:1643–1657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piao SL, Ciais Philippe, Huang Y et al (2010) The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in China. Nature 467:43–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ran ML, Chen Z, Gu YC (1993) Situation for development and research of China’s rice-duck. Chin J Anim Sci 5:59–62 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rath AK, Mohanty SR, Mishra S et al (1999) Methane production in unamended and ricestrawamended soil at different moisture levels. Biol Fertil Soils 28:145–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seck P, Mohanty ADS, Wopereis MCS (2012) Crops that feed the world 7: rice. Food Secur 4:7–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takai Y (1970) The mechanism of methane formation in flooded paddy soil. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 16:238–244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tester M, Langridge P (2010) Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science 327:818–822

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1999) Global environmental impacts of agricultural expansion: the need for sustainable and efficient practices. PNAS 96:5995–6000

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA et al (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671–677

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang MX (2001) CH4 emission in paddy field in China. Scientific Publisher, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang JP, Cao CG, Li CF et al (2009) Algal change in paddy water under rice-duck complex ecosystem. Acta Ecologici Sinica 29(8):4353–4360 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiang PA, Huang H, Huang M et al (2006) Studies on technique of reducing methane emission in a rice-duck ecological system and the evaluation of its economic significance. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 39(5):968–975 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie J, Hu LL, Tang JJ et al (2011) Ecological mechanisms underlying the sustainability of the agricultural heritage rice-fish co-culture system. PNAS 108(50):1381–1387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang SS, Chang EH (1998) Effect of environmental conditions on methane production and emission from paddy soil. Agric Ecosyst Environ 69:69–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang ZP, Liu XY, Huang H et al (2004) A study on the influence of rice-duck intergrowth on spider, rice diseases, insect and weeds in rice-duck. Acta Ecologica Sinica 12:2756–2760 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu SM, Jin QY (2006) New technology of rice-duck symbiosis. China Agriculture Science and Technology Press, Beijing, pp 1–8 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu SM, Zhu LF, Ouyang YN et al (2008) Effects of rice-duck farming system on biotic populations in paddy field. Chin J Appl Ecol 19(4):807–812 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan WL, Cao CG, Wang JP et al (2008) Nitrous oxide emission from rice-duck complex ecosystem and the evaluation of its economic significance. Acta Ecologica Sinica 28(7):3060–3066 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan WL, Cao CG, Wang JP et al (2010) The community structure and diversity of phytoplankton in rice-fish ecological system. Acta Ecologica Sinica 30(1):253–257 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhan M, Cao CG, Wang JP et al (2008a) Effects of rice-duck farming on paddy field‘s methane emission. Chin J Appl Ecol 19(12):2666–2672 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan M, Cao CG, Wang JP et al (2008b) Analysis of diversity of soil microbial community of the wetland rice-duck and rice-fish complex ecosystem. Acta Pedol Sin 45(6):1179–1183 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhan M, Cao CG, Jiang Y et al (2010) Dynamics of active organic carbon in a paddy soil under different rice farming modes. Chin J Appl Ecol 21(8):2010–2016 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JE, Ouyang Y, Huang ZX (2008) Characterization of nitrous oxide emission from a rice-duck farming system in South China. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 54:167–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng YH, Deng GB, Lu GM (1997) Economic benefits of rice-duck complex ecosystem—a preliminary study. Chin J Appl Ecol 8(4):431–434 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was a part of the Project for “12th 5-year plan” Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (Grant No. 201203081), National Programs for high-yielding rice Science and Technology (Grant No. 2013BAD07B11), and Hunan “A Hundred Scholars” Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Huang Huang or Jianwu Tang.

Additional information

Handled by Fusuo Zhang, China Agricultural University, China.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 94 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOC 126 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, H., Huang, H., Chen, C. et al. Traditional symbiotic farming technology in China promotes the sustainability of a flooded rice production system. Sustain Sci 12, 155–161 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0399-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0399-8

Keywords

Navigation