Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The real type and ideal type of transdisciplinary processes: part II—what constraints and obstacles do we meet in practice?

  • Special Feature: Review Article
  • The Reality of Transdisciplinary Processes
  • Published:
Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper builds on the theoretical foundation outlined in Part I (‘The real type and ideal type of transdisciplinary processes: part I—theoretical foundations’) which is included in the same special feature. Mode 2 transdisciplinarity processes are characterized as processes that relate or integrate problem-oriented interdisciplinary research with knowledge generated in a multi-stakeholder approach with the objective to develop socially robust orientations, for instance, on sustainable transitioning. In practice, transdisciplinary processes may have different functions (i.e., societal capacity building, consensus building, analytic mediation, and legitimization). Practitioners and scientists may follow different interests. And we may distinguish between different types of knowledge integration (including different perspectives, modes of thoughts or cultures). Thus, the reality of transdisciplinarity processes may become a very complex and ambitious venture whose multiple objectives are difficult to realize in practice. This paper reviews the existing challenges, obstacles, and constraints of transdisciplinary processes. This review refers to 41 mid- and large-scale transdisciplinary studies run by members of the ITdNet at seven universities on sustainable transitions of urban and regional systems, organizations, and policy processes. A comprehensive table can be used as a checklist for identifying and coping with constraints and obstacles of transdisciplinary processes in practice. The discussion identifies the main challenges for the future development of transdisciplinarity’s theory and practice, including linking Mode 1 transdisciplinarity (i.e., the relating of disciplinary causation for which no interdisciplinarity is possible by merging concepts and methods) and Mode 2 transdisciplinarity, which targets sustainable knowledge and action for system transitioning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous Referee #2 (2014) Interactive comment on “Recent revisions of phosphate rock reserves and resources: reassuring or misleading? An in-depth literature review of global estimates of phosphate rock reserves and resources” by J. D. Edixhoven et al. Earth Syst Dyn Discuss 4:C575–C598

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronsson M (2002) Stadsförbättring Hamnen Malmö. University of Göteborg, Kandidatuppsats i Kulturgeografi, Götheborg

  • Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological-research—conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173–1182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barondess JA (1996) Medicine against society—lessons from the Third Reich. JAMA 276(20):1657–1661

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Binder CR, Hofer C, Wiek A, Scholz RW (2004) Transition towards improved regional wood flows by integrating material flux analysis and agent analysis: the case of Appenzell Ausserrhoden, Switzerland. Ecol Econ 49(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder CR, Absenger-Helmli I, Schilling T (2015) The reality of rransdisciplinarity: a framework-based self-reflection from science and practice leaders. Sustain Sci. doi:10.1007/s11625-015-0328-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunders JFG, Broerse JEW, Keil F, Pohl C, Scholz RW, Zweekhorst MBM (2010) How can transdisciplinary research contribute to knowledge democracy? In: Knowledge democracy, Springer, Berlin, pp 125–152

  • Cook PJ (2014) Interactive comment on “Recent revisions of phosphate rock reserves and resources: reassuring or misleading? An in-depth literature review of global estimates of phosphate rock reserves and resources” by J. D. Edixhoven et al. Earth Syst Dyn Discuss 4:C683–C685

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston L (1992) Objectivity and the escape from perspective. Soc Stud Sci 22(4):597–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edixhoven JD, Gupta J, Savenije HHG (2013) Recent revisions of phosphate rock reserves and resources: reassuring or misleading? An in-depth literature review of global estimates of phosphate rock reserves and resources. Earth Syst Dyn Discuss 4:1005–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edixhoven JD, Gupta J, Savenije HHG (2014) Recent revisions of phosphate rock reserves and resources: a critique. Earth Syst Dyn 5:491–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eilittä M (2011) The global TraPs project. In: Transdisciplinary processes for sustainable phosphorus management (2010–2015). Multi-stakeholder forum to guide and optimize P use. ETH-NSSI and IFDC, Zurich and Muscle Shoals

  • Fisher R, Ury W (1981) Getting to yes: negotiating agreement without giving in. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons M, Nowotny H (2001) The potential of transdisciplinarity. In: Thompson Klein J, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Häberli R, Bill A, Scholz RW, Welti M (eds) Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem solving among science, technology, and society. An effective way for managing complexity. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 67–80

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Guinée JB (2002) Handbook of life cycle assessment: operational guide to the ISO standards. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Günther S (2004) Sustainable tourism development on La Digue Island, Republic of Seychelles. Transdisciplinary methods for sustainable solutions in a tropical paradise. Unpublished Diploma Thesis, ETH Zurich, Zurich

  • Habermas J (1996) Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy (trans: Regh W). MIT Press, Cambridge

  • Hilton J (2014) Interactive comment on “Recent revisions of phosphate rock reserves and resources: reassuring or misleading? An in-depth literature review of global estimates of phosphate rock reserves and resources” by J. D. Edixhoven et al. Earth Syst Dyn Discuss 4:EC686–EC686

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang DB, Scholz RW, Gujer W, Chitwood DE, Loukopoulos P, Schertenleib R et al (2007) Discrete event simulation for exploring strategies: an urban water management case. Environ Sci Technol 41(3):915–921

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ITdNet (2014) International transdisciplinarity network. Retrieved November 11, 2014

  • Jahn T, Bergmann M, Keil F (2012) Transdisciplinarity: between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecol Econ 79:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jantsch E (1970) Inter- and transdisciplinary university: a systems approach to education and innovation. Policy Sci 1:403–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff S (1996) Beyond epistemology: relativism and engagement in the politics of science. Soc Stud Sci 26:393–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junker B, Flüeler T, Stauffacher M, Scholz RW (2008) Description of the safety case for long-term disposal of radioactive waste—the iterative safety analysis approach as utilized in Switzerland (technical paper as part of the project: “Long-term dimension of radioactive waste disposal: the role of the time dimension for risk perception”). ETH Zürich, Zurich

  • Karelaia N, Hogarth RM (2008) Determinants of linear judgment: a meta-analysis of lens model studies. Psychol Bull 134(3):404–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein JT (2008) Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. A literature review. Am J Prev Med 35:S116–S123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krementsov NN (2006) Big revolution, little revolution: science and politics in Bolshevik Russia. Social Res 73(4):1173–1204

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruetli P, Stauffacher M, Pedolin D, Moser C, Scholz RW (2012) The process matters: fairness in repository siting for nuclear waste. Soc Justice Res 25(1):79–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krutli P, Flueler T, Stauffacher M, Wiek A, Scholz RW (2010) Technical safety vs. public involvement? A case study on the unrealized project for the disposal of nuclear waste at Wellenberg (Switzerland). J Integr Environ Sci 7(3):229–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznick PJ (1987) Beyond the laboratory: scientists as political activists in 1930s America. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P et al (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain Sci 7:25–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff L, Ward J (2005) Science shops: a kaleidoscope of science-society collaborations in Europe. Public Underst Sci 14(4):353–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton RK (1996) On social structure and science. Edited and with an introduction by Piotr Sztompka. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Miah J, Griffiths A, McNeill R, Poonaji I, Martin R, Morse S et al (2015) A small scale transdisciplinary process to maximising the energy efficiency of food factories: insights and recommendations from the development of a novel heat integration framework. Sustain Sci. doi:10.1007/s11625-015-0331-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser C, Stauffacher M, Kruetli P, Scholz RW (2012a) The crucial role of nomothetic and idiographic conceptions of time: interdisciplinary collaboration in nuclear waste management. Risk Anal 32(1):138–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser C, Stauffacher M, Kruetli P, Scholz RW (2012b) The influence of linear and cyclical temporal representations on risk perception of nuclear waste: an experimental study. J Risk Res 15(5):459–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser C, Stauffacher M, Smieszek T, Seidl R, Kruetli P, Scholz RW (2013) Psychological factors in discounting negative impacts of nuclear waste. J Environ Psychol 35:121–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolescu B (2006) Transdisciplinarity: past, present and future. In: Haverkort B, Reijntjes C (eds) Moving Worldviews—Reshaping sciences, policies and practices for endogenous sustainable development, COMPAS Editions, vol 142–166, pp 142–166

  • Nicolescu B (2014) From modernity to cosmodernity. State University of New York Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Njoroge R, Birech R, Korir M, Mutisya M, Scholz RW (2015) Transdisciplinary processes of developing, applying, and evaluating a method for improving smallholder farmers' access to (phosphorus) fertilizers: The SMAP method. Sustain Sci

  • Pohl C, Rist S, Zimmermann A, Fry P, Gurung GS, Schneider F et al (2010) Researchers’ roles in knowledge co-production: experience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal. Sci Public Policy 37(4):267–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posch A, Steiner G, Risopoulos F (2005) Die Erzherzog-Johann-Fallstudie: ein inter-und transdisziplinäres Lehr-und Forschungsprojekt der Kulturlandschaftsforschung; (Nachhaltigkeit durch Innovation-Entwicklungspotenzial einer Bergbaufolgelandschaft). Bundesministerium f. Bildung, Wissenschaft und Kultur, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Preacher JK, Hayes AF (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 36(4):717–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed MS, Graves A, Dandy N, Posthumus H, Hubacek K, Morris J et al (2009) Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J Environ Manag 90(5):1933–1949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Beckmann M, Hansen EG (2013) Transdisciplinarity in corporate sustainability: mapping the field. Bus Strateg Environ 22(4):219–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneidewind U, Scheck H (2013) Die Stadt als „Reallabor“ für Systeminnovationen. In: Rückert-John J (ed) Soziale Innovation und Nachhaltigkeit. Perspektiven sozialen Wandels. Springer VS, Wiesbaden, pp 229–248

  • Scholz RW (2000) Mutual learning as a basic principle of transdisciplinarity. In: Scholz RW, Häberli R, Bill A, Welti W (eds) Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem-solving among science, technology and society. Workbook II: Mutual learning sessions. Haffmans Sachbuch, Zürich, pp 13–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz RW (2011) Environmental literacy in science and society: from knowledge to decisions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz RW (2012) Transdisziplinäre Krebsforschung mit den Mayas. Das Macocc Projekt—Body-Mind Komplementaritäten auf der Ebene der Zelle, des Patienten und der therapeutischen Allianz. EANU Spec 7:1–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz RW (forthcoming). From visual perception to sustainable transition management: Egon Brunswik’s theory of probabilistic functionalism

  • Scholz RW, Marks D (2001) Learning about transdisciplinarity: where are we? Where have we been? Where should we go? In: Klein JT, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Häberli R, Bill A, Scholz RW, Welti M (eds) Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem solving among science, technology, and society. Birkhäuser Verlag AG, Basel, pp 236–252

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz RW, Stauffacher M (2007) Managing transition in clusters: area development negotiations as a tool for sustaining traditional industries in a Swiss prealpine region. Environ Plan A 39(10):2518–2539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz RW, Stauffacher M (2009) From a science for society to a science with society. Psychologische Rundschau 60(4):242–U280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz RW, Steiner G (2015) The real type and ideal type of transdisciplinary processes: part I—theoretical foundations. Sust Sci. doi:10.1007/s11625-015-0326-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz RW, Tietje O (2002) Embedded case study methods: integrating quantitative and qualitative knowledge. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz RW, Wellmer F-W (2013) Approaching a dynamic view on the availability of mineral resources: what we may learn from the case of phosphorus? Glob Environ Change 23:11–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz RW, Wellmer F-W (2014)Comment on: “Recent revisions of phosphate rock reserves and resources: a critique” by Edixhoven et al. (2014)–phosphate reserves and resources: what conceptions and data do stakeholders need for sustainable action? Earth Syst Dyn Discuss 5(5): 1–49

  • Scholz RW, Bösch S, Koller T, Mieg HA, Stünzi J (eds) (1996) Industrieareal Sulzer-Escher Wyss: Umwelt und Bauen—Wertschöpfung durch Umnutzung (ETH-UNS Fallstudie 1995) [Industrial area Sulzer-Escher Wyss: environment and construction—value added through re-use (ETH-UNS case study 1995)]. vdf, Zurich

  • Scholz RW, Bösch S, Stauffacher M, Oswald J (eds) (2001) Zukunft Schiene Schweiz 1: Ökoeffizientes Handeln der SBB. ETH-UNS Fallstudie 1999 [Future of railway systems 1: ecoefficient acting of the Swiss Railway Company. ETH-UNS Case Study 1999. Rüegger, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz RW, Stauffacher M, Bösch S, Wiek A (eds) (2002) Landschaftsnutzung für die Zukunft: der Fall Appenzell Ausserrhoden (ETH-UNS Fallstudie 2001) [Utilisation of landscape for the future: the case of Appenzell Ausserrhoden (ETH-UNS case study 2001)]. Rüegger und Pabst, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz RW, Stauffacher M, Bösch S, Krütli P (eds) (2003) Appenzell Ausserrhoden Umwelt Wirtschaft Region. ETH-UNS Fallstudie 2002 [environment economy region. ETH-UNS case study 2002]. Rüegger und Pabst, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz RW, Lang DJ, Wiek A, Walter AI, Stauffacher M (2006) Transdisciplinary case studies as a means of sustainability learning: historical framework and theory. Int J Sustain High Educ 7(3):226–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz RW, Stauffacher M, Bösch S, Krütli P, Wiek A (eds) (2007) Entscheidungsprozesse Wellenberg - Lagerung radioaktiver Abfälle in der Schweiz (ETH-UNS Fallstudie 2006) [Decision processes Wellenberg—repository of radioactive waste in Switzerland (ETH-UNS case study 2006]. Rüegger, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz RW, Ulrich AE, Eilittä M, Roy AH (2013) Sustainable use of phosphorus: a finite resource. Sci Tot Environ 461:799–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz RW, Roy AH, Brand FS, Hellums DT, Ulrich AE (eds) (2014a) Sustainable phosphorus management: a global transdisciplinary roadmap. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz RW, Roy AH, Hellums DT (2014b) Sustainable phosphorus management. A transdisciplinary challenge. In: Scholz RW, Roy AH, Brand FS, Hellums DT, Ulrich AE (eds) Sustainable phosphorus management. A sustainable roadmap. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–128

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schori S, Krütli M, Stauffacher M, Flüeler T, Scholz RW (2009) Siting of nuclear waste repositories in Switzerland and Sweden. Stakeholder preferences for the interplay between technical expertise and social input. ETH-NSSI case study 2008. ETH, Zurich

  • Seidl R, Brand F, Stauffacher M, Krütli P, Le QB, Spörri A et al (2013) Science with society in the anthropocene. Ambio 42(1):5–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stauffacher M, Flueeler T, Krueli P, Scholz RW (2008) Analytic and dynamic approach to collaboration: a transdisciplinary case study on sustainable landscape development in a Swiss prealpine region. Syst Pract Action Res 21(6):409–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens JC, Hernandez ME, Roman M, Graham AC, Scholz RW (2008) Higher education as a change agent for sustainability in different cultures and contexts. Int J Sustain High Educ 9(3):317–338

  • Steiner G, Posch A (2006) Higher education for sustainability by means of transdisciplinary case studies: an innovative approach for solving complex, real-world problems. J Clean Prod 14:877–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stirling A (2008) “Opening up” and “Closing down”—power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Sci Technol Hum Values 33(2):262–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokols D, Hall KL, Taylor BK, Moser RP (2008) The science of team science—overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. Am J Prev Med 35(2):S77–S89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susskind LE, McKearnen S, Thomas-Lamar J (1999) The consensus building handbook: a comprehensive guide to reaching agreement. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

  • van Breda J, Musango JK, Brent AC (in press) Undertaking individual transdisciplinary PhD research for sustainable development: case studies from South Africa. Int J Sustain High Educ

  • Vilsmaier U, Engbers M, Luthardt P, Maas-Deipenbrock R-M, Wunderlich S, Scholz RW (2015) Case based mutual learning sessions: knowledge integration and transfer in transdisciplinary processes. Sustain Sci. doi:10.1007/s11625-015-0335-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter AI, Helgenberger S, Wiek A, Scholz RW (2007) Measuring societal effects of transdisciplinary research projects: design and application of an evaluation method. Eval Program Plan 30:325–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickson F, Carew AL, Russell AW (2006) Transdisciplinary research: characteristics, quandaries and quality. Futures 38(9):1046–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiek A (2007) Challenges of transdisciplinary research as interactive knowledge generation—experiences from transdisciplinary case study research. Gaia-Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 16(1):52–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiek A, Walter AI (2009) A transdisciplinary approach for formalized integrated planning and decision-making in complex systems. Eur J Oper Res 197(1):360–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zscheischler J, Rogga S (2015) Transdisciplinarity in land use science—a review of concepts, empirical findings and current practices. Futures 65:28–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fraunhofer Institute for Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology (IGB), Stuttgart, Germany

    Roland W. Scholz

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Roland W. Scholz

  3. Department for Knowledge and Communication Management, Danube University Krems, Krems, Austria

    Gerald Steiner

  4. Weatherhead Center for International Affairs (WCFIA), Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Gerald Steiner

Authors
  1. Roland W. Scholz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gerald Steiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roland W. Scholz.

Additional information

Handled by Osamu Saito, UNU-Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability (IAS), Japan.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 189 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scholz, R.W., Steiner, G. The real type and ideal type of transdisciplinary processes: part II—what constraints and obstacles do we meet in practice?. Sustain Sci 10, 653–671 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0327-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0327-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation