Abstract
This paper develops an analytical model to calculate the amount by which individuals are expected to modify their values (the relationship between lifestyle and happiness, as measured by subjective well-being, SWB) and to adopt innovative technologies (to increase the sustainability of production and consumption, measured by the ecological footprint, EF) to allow current and future generations to achieve sustainable happiness (the pursuit of happiness that does not exploit other people, the environment, or future generations). The paper also examines the dependence of these changes on an individual’s concern for future generations and on their country’s current state of economic development. It is shown that individuals in better-off developed countries and individuals in worse-off developing countries can achieve sustainability with a reasonable level of value change (0–30 %) and a feasible degree of technological innovation (10–40 %), respectively. In contrast, individuals in better-off developing countries and individuals in worse-off developed countries must rely to an impractical degree of technological innovation (50–70 %) and to an unreasonable level of value change (40–70 %), respectively. Finally, individuals in developing countries differ from individuals in developed countries in terms of their potential to achieve sustainable happiness, by achieving sustainability at a low SWB (about 10 % of its maximum) and a high SWB (about 80 % of its maximum), respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bagliani M et al (2008) A consumption-based approach to environmental Kuznets curves using the ecological footprint indicator. Ecol Econ 65:650–661
Baumgartner S, Quaas M (2010) Sustainability economics—general versus specific, and conceptual versus practical. Ecol Econ 69:2056–2059
Bonini A (2008) Cross-national variation in individual life satisfaction: effects of national wealth, human development, and environmental conditions. Soc Indic Res 87:223–236
Brand F (2009) Critical natural capital revisited: ecological resilience and sustainable development. Ecol Econ 68:605–612
Brown KW, Kasser T (2005) Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle. Soc Indic Res 74:349–368
Buenstorf G, Cordes C (2008) Can sustainable consumption be learned? A model of cultural evolution. Ecol Econ 67:646–657
Cowel FA (1995) Measuring inequality. Prentice Hall, London
Dasgupta P (1998) Population, consumption and resources: ethical issues. Ecol Econ 24:139–152
De Vires BJM, Petersen AC (2009) Conceptualising sustainable development: an assessment methodology connecting values, knowledge, worldviews and scenarios. Ecol Econ 68:1006–1019
Deci EL, Ryan RM (2008) Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: an introduction. J Happiness Stud 9:1–11
Diffenbaugh NS (2013) Human well-being, the global emissions debt, and climate change commitment. Sustain Sci 8:135–141
Eckersley R (2007) Progress, sustainability and human well-being: is a new worldview emerging? Int J Innov Sustain Dev 1:304–317
Engelbrecht H-J (2009) Natural capital, subjective well-being, and the new welfare economics of sustainability: some evidence from cross-country regressions. Ecol Econ 69:380–388
Ericson T, Kjonstad BG, Barstad A (2014) Mindfulness and sustainability. Ecol Econ 104:73–79
Escobar-Tello MC, Bhamra T (2013) Happiness as a harmonising path for bringing higher education towards sustainability. Environ Dev Sustain 15:177–197
Ferrer-i-Carbonell A, Gowdy JM (2007) Environmental degradation and happiness. Ecol Econ 60:509–516
Fiala N (2008) Measuring sustainability: why the EF is bad economics and bad environmental science. Ecol Econ 67:519–525
Frame B, Brown J (2008) Developing post-normal technologies for sustainability. Ecol Econ 65:225–241
Gowdy J (2005) Toward a new welfare economics of sustainability. Ecol Econ 53:211–222
Gsottbauer E, van den Berg JCJM (2011) Environmental policy theory given bounded rationality and other-regarding preferences. Environ Resour Econ 49:263–304
Haller M, Hadler M (2006) How social relations and structures can produce happiness and unhappiness: an international comparative analysis. Soc Indic Res 75:169–216
Helliwell JF (2014) Social norms, happiness, and the environment: closing the circle. Sustain: Sci Pract Policy 10:78–84
Hellstrand S et al (2009) The relevance of ecological and economic policies for sustainable development. Environ Dev Sustain 11:853–870
Huesemann MH, Huesemann JA (2008) Will progress in science and technology aver or accelerate global collapse? A critical analysis and policy recommendations. Environ Dev Sustain 10:787–825
Inglehart R et al (2008) Development, freedom, and rising happiness. Perspect Psychol Sci 3:264–285
IPCC (2007) Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories
Jabereen Y (2008) A new conceptual framework for sustainable development. Environ Dev Sustain 10:179–192
Kallis G et al (2012) The economics of degrowth. Ecol Econ 84:172–180
Kasser T (2002) The high price of materialism. MIT Press, Cambridge
Kissinger M, Rees WE (2010) Exporting natural capital: the foreign eco-footprint on Costa Rica and implications for sustainability. Environ Dev Sustain 12:547–560
Kitzes J et al (2009) A research agenda for improving national EF accounts. Ecol Econ 68:1991–2007
Konchak W, Pascual U (2006) Converging economic paradigms for a constructive environmental policy discourse. Environ Sci Policy 9:10–21
Kratena K, Streicher G (2012) Spatial welfare economics vs. ecological footprint: a sensitivity analysis introducing strong sustainability. Environ Resour Econ 51:617–622
Lianos TP (2013) The world budget constraint. Environ Dev Sustain 15:1543–1553
Lothgren M (1997) Generalised stochastic frontier production models. Econ Lett 57:255–259
Malghan D (2011) A dimensionally consistent aggregation framework for biophysical metrics. Ecol Econ 70:900–909
Moffat I (2008) A preliminary analysis of composite indicators of sustainable development. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 15:81–87
Moran DD et al (2008) Measuring sustainable development—nation by nation. Ecol Econ 64:470–474
Motesharrei S, Riva J, Kalnay E (2014) Human and nature dynamics (HANDY): modeling inequality and use of resources in the collapse or sustainability of societies. Ecol Econ 101:90–102
Mulder KF (2007) Innovation for sustainable development: from environmental design to transition management. Sustain Sci 2:253–263
NEF (2012) The happy planet index 1.0. www.neweconomics.org
O’Brien C (2008) Sustainable happiness: how happiness studies can contribute to a more sustainable future. Can Psychol 49:289–295
Quental N et al (2011) Sustainability: characteristics and scientific roots. Environ Dev Sustain 13:257–276
Romer JE (2011) The ethics of inter-temporal distribution in a warning planet. Environ Resour Econ 48:363–390
Sabau GL (2010) Know, live and let live: towards a redefinition of the knowledge-based economy—sustainable development nexus. Ecol Econ 69:1193–1201
Solomon UU (2010) A detailed look at three disciplines, environmental ethics, law and education to determine which plays the most critical role in environmental enhancement and protection. Environ Dev Sustain 12:1069–1080
Veenhoven R (2005) Apparent quality-of-life in nations: how long and happy people live. Soc Indic Res 71:61–86
Venetoulis J, Talberth J (2008) Refining the ecological footprint. Environ Dev Sustain 10:441–469
WCED (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Toronto
Welsch H (2003) Freedom and rationality as predictors of cross-national happiness patterns: the role of income as a mediating variable. J Happiness Stud 4:295–321
Welsch H (2007) Environmental welfare analysis: a life satisfaction approach. Ecol Econ 62:544–551
Welsch H (2009) Implication of happiness research for environmental economics. Ecol Econ 68:2735–2742
White N (2007) Sharing resources: the global distribution of the ecological footprint. Ecol Econ 64:402–410
WWF (2010) Living planet report, Avenue du Mont-Blanc CH-1196 Gland, Switzerland
Zagonari F (2011) Which ethics will make us individually and socially happier? And cross development analytical model. J Happiness Stud 1:77–103
Zidansek A (2007) Sustainable happiness and happiness in nations. Energy 32:891–897
Ziolkowska JR, Ziolkowski B (2011) Product generational dematerialization indicator: a case of crude oil in the global economy. Energy 36:5925–5934
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handled by Richard Bawden, Systemic Development Institute, Australia.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zagonari, F. Technology improvements and value changes for sustainable happiness: a cross-development analytical model. Sustain Sci 10, 687–698 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0311-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0311-y