Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Regional agricultural governance in peri-urban and rural South Australia: strategies to improve multifunctionality

  • Special Feature: Case Report
  • Pathways towards sustainable landscapes
  • Published:
Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Historically, agricultural policy in Australia has focused on maximising the economic productivity and efficiency of the sector. The issues that have arisen from this governance focus are manyfold. In this study, we illustrate the regional disparity and implications for agricultural sustainability caused by such a policy model. We surveyed farmers in two South Australian case study regions, the adjoining peri-urban Barossa-Light region, and the rural area of Loxton. It was found that respondents from Loxton had larger properties, saw more benefits from government support for agriculture, and were more likely to prioritise support for their local community and increases in productivity. Respondents from Barossa-Light were more concerned about risks of urban encroachment, prioritised keeping their farms in their families, and were generally more concerned about government support. These results highlight the complexity involved with applying appropriate government support mechanisms across a diverse industry such as agriculture, with various regional sustainability issues driving respondent priorities. We also suggest that regional variation will require explicit planning which aims for heterogeneous goals and that educational and cooperative pursuits may help to increase the capacity of the land managers in the case study regions. These suggestions have broader implications for other regions where agricultural diversity complicates policy to support the industry within historically productivist agricultural regimes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  • ABARE (2006) Agriculture in Australia: past, present, future. Australian Government, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • ABARE (2009) Australian farm survey results: 2007–08 to 2008–09. ABARE, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • ABARE (2010) Australian farm survey results: 2007–08 to 2009–10. ABARE, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams P (2010) Cyber farmers. Retrieved 22 Jan 2013, from http://www.abc.net.au/landline/content/2010/s3034148.htm

  • Aitkin D (1985) “Countrymindedness”: the spread of an idea. Aust Cult Hist 4:34–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Amekawa Y, Sseguya H, Onzere S, Carranza I (2010) Delineating the multifunctional role of agroecological practices: toward sustainable livelihoods for smallholder farmers in developing countries. J Sustain Agric 34(2):202–228. doi:10.1080/10440040903433079

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrée P, Dibden J, Higgins V, Cocklin C (2010) Competitive productivism and Australia’s emerging ‘alternative’ agri-food networks: producing for farmers’ markets in Victoria and beyond. Aust Geogr 41(3):307–322. doi:10.1080/00049182.2010.498038

    Google Scholar 

  • Argent N (2002) From pillar to post? In search of the post-productivist countryside in Australia. Aust Geogr 33(1):97–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Argent N (2011) Trouble in paradise? Governing Australia’s multifunctional rural landscapes. Aust Geogr 42(2):183–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Argent N, Tonts M, Jones R, Holmes J (2014) The amenity principle, internal migration, and rural development in Australia. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 104(2):305–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin N (2012) Farming lobby looks at models for the future. The Advertiser, p 61

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (1998) Agriculture: South Australia 1996–1997. Australian Government, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2008a) Agricultural state profile, South Australia, 2006–2007. Retrieved 15 June 2011, from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/FF8D03E1A74D8D6ACA2574D4001DA912?opendocument

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2008b) Agriculture in focus: farming families, Australia, 2006. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2011a) Census data: population by postcode, age, industry of employment and highest level of education. Retrieved from http://abs.gov.au/websitedbs/censushome.nsf/home/tablebuilder?opendocument&navpos=240

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2011b) Land management and farming in Australia, 2009–10. Retrieved 22 Aug 2012, from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/4627.02009-10?OpenDocument

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2012a) Agricultural commodities, Australia, 2010–11. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2012b) Australian social trends, Dec 2012. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra

  • Australian Electoral Commission (2013) South Australian electoral map. Retrieved 14 May 2013, from http://www.aec.gov.au/Elections/federal_elections/2010/files/sa-results-map-2010.pdf

  • Australian Government (2010) Privacy Act. Retrieved 20 Feb 2011, from http://www.privacy.gov.au/law/act

  • Australian Government (2012) Exceptional circumstances. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Canberra. Retrieved from http://www.daff.gov.au/agriculture-food/drought/ec/

  • Australian Government (2013) National food plan, Canberra. Retrieved from http://www.daff.gov.au/nationalfoodplan/white-paper

  • Bardsley DK, Bardsley AM (2014) Organising for socio-ecological resilience: the roles of the mountain farmer cooperative Genossenschaft Gran Alpin in Graubünden, Switzerland. Ecol Econ 98:11–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardsley D, Pech P (2012) Defining spaces of resilience within the neoliberal paradigm: could French land use classifications guide support for risk management within an Australian regional context? Hum Ecol 40(1):129–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth M, Michelsen G (2013) Learning for change: an educational contribution to sustainability science. Sustain Sci 8(1):103–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorkhaug H, Richards C (2008) Multifunctional agriculture in policy and practice? A comparative analysis of Norway and Australia. J Rural Stud 24(1):98–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohnet IC (2010) Integrating social and ecological knowledge for planning sustainable land-and sea-scapes: experiences from the Great Barrier Reef region, Australia. Landsc Ecol 25(8):1201–1218

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohnet I, Smith DM (2007) Planning future landscapes in the wet tropics of Australia: a social–ecological framework. Landsc Urban Plan 80(1):137–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown M, Fraser T (2011) Is the use of video conferencing and supporting technologies a feasible and viable way to woo farmers back into farmer education? Aust J Adult Learn 51:180–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan BA, Raymond CM, Crossman ND, Macdonald DH (2010) Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: where, what, and how? Landsc Urban Plan 97(2):111–122. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.002

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant L (1999) The detraditionalization of occupational identities in farming in South Australia. Sociol Rural 39(2):236–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman A (2008) Social research methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton R, Wilson G (1999) The Yellow Pages as a sampling frame for farm surveys: assessing potential bias in agri-environmental research. J Rural Stud 15(1):91–102. doi:10.1016/s0743-0167(98)00015-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark C (2012) Risky business. Retrieved 19 June 2012, from http://www.abc.net.au/landline/content/2012/s3526971.htm

  • Cobanoglu C, Warde B, Moreo P (2001) A comparison of mail, fax and web-based survey methods. Int J Mark Res 43(4):441–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocklin C, Dibden J, Mautner N (2006) From market to multifunctionality? Land stewardship in Australia. Geogr J 172(3):197–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman WD, Skogstad G (1995) Neo-liberalism, policy networks, and policy change: agricultural policy reform in Australia and Canada. Aust J Polit Sci 30(2):242–263. doi:10.1080/00323269508402335

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossman ND, Bryan BA (2009) Identifying cost-effective hotspots for restoring natural capital and enhancing landscape multifunctionality. Ecol Econ 68(3):654–668. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.05.003

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibden J, Potter C, Cocklin C (2009) Contesting the neoliberal project for agriculture: productivist and multifuncitonal trajectories in the European Union and Australia. J Rural Stud 25(3):299–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman DA (1991) The design and administration of mail surveys. Ann Rev Sociol 17:225–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman DA (2006) Procedures for conducting government-sponsored establishment surveys: comparisons of the total design method (TDM), a traditional cost-compensation model, and tailored design. Washington State University, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman DA, Sangster RL, Tarnai J, Rockwood TH (1996) Understanding differences in people’s answers to telephone and mail surveys. New Dir Eval 70:45–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman D, Smyth J, Christian L (2009) Internet, mail and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielke S, Bardsley D (2013) South Australian farmers’ markets: tools for enhancing the multifunctionality of Australian agriculture. GeoJournal 78(5):759–776. doi:10.1007/s10708-012-9464-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielke S, Bardsley D (2014) The role of farmer education in South Australia. Land Use Policy 39:301–312. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.02.006

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowerdew R, Martin D (2005) Methods in human geography: a guide for students doing a research project. Pearson Prentice Hall, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg B (2006) Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qual Inq 12:219–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser A (2011) Battle between mining and agriculture threatens $22bn in coal-seam gas projects. The Australian

  • Garnett, A (2014) Farmers are in debt, and more debt won’t help. Retrieved 12 Feb 2014, from http://theconversation.com/farmers-are-in-debt-and-more-debt-wont-help-22698

  • Geer J (1991) Do open-ended questions measure ‘salient’ issues. Public Opin Q 55:360–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of South Australia (2007) South Australian food plan 2007–2010. PIRSA, Adelaide

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of South Australia (2010) South Australian food strategy 2010–2015: beyond the expectations of consumers around the globe. Government of South Australia, Adelaide

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of South Australia (2011) Protecting the Barossa Valley and McLaren Vale. Department of Planning and Local Government, Adelaide

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhill J, King D, Lane A, MacDougall C (2009) Understanding resilience in South Australian farm families. Rural Soc 19(4):318–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettne B (ed) (2008) Sustainable development in a globalized world. Palgrave MacMillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins V, Dibden J, Cocklin C (2008) Neoliberalism and natural resource management: agri-environmental standards and the governing of farming practises. Geoforum 39(5):1776–1785

    Google Scholar 

  • History Trust of South Australia (2003) Map of Goyder’s line. Retrieved from http://www.history.sa.gov.au/chu/programs/sa_history/sa_dry/map_goyders.htm

  • Hoddinott SN, Bass MJ (1986) The Dillman total design survey method. Can Fam Physician 32:2366–2368

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes J (2006) Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: gaps in the research agenda. J Rural Stud 22(2):142–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikutegbe V, Gill N, Klepeis P (2014) Same but different: sources of natural resource management advice for lifestyle oriented rural landholders. J Environ Plan Manag. doi:10.1080/09640568.2014.936551

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson YM (1988) Through industry to prosperity: a history of Loxton. Loxton A. & H. Society, Loxton

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DW, Johnson RT, Smith KA (2000) Constructive controversy: the educative power of intellectual conflict. Change Mag High Learn 32(1):28–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplowitz M, Hadlock T, Levine R (2004) A comparison of web and mail survey response rates. Public Opin Q 68(1):94–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly WS (1962) Rural development in South Australia. Rigby, Adelaide

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobley M, Butler A, Winter M (2013) Local organic food for local people? Organic marketing strategies in England and Wales. Reg Stud 47(2):216–228. doi:10.1080/00343404.2010.546780

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockie S, Higgins V (2007) Roll-out neoliberalism and hybrid practises of regulation in Australian agri-environmental governance. J Rural Stud 23(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughnane B (2013) Our plan Retrieved 8 Nov 2013, from http://www.liberal.org.au/our-policies

  • Macias T (2008) Working toward a just, equitable, and local food system: the social impact of community-based agriculture. Soc Sci Q 89(5):1086–1101. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00566.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather A, Hill G, Nijink M (2006) Post-productivism and rural land use: cul de sac or challenge for theorization? J Rural Stud 22(4):441–455

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy J (2005) Rural geography: multifunctional rural geographies—reactionary or radical? Prog Hum Geogr 29(6):773–782

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie F (2013) Farmer-driven innovation in New South Wales, Australia. Aust Geogr 44(1):81–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows J, Emtage N, Herbohn J (2014) Engaging Australian small-scale lifestyle landowners in natural resource management programmes—perceptions, past experiences and policy implications. Land Use Policy 36:618–627. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.10.016

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller TR (2013) Constructing sustainability science: emerging perspectives and research trajectories. Sustain Sci 8(2):279–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller TR, Wiek A, Sarewitz D, Robinson J, Olsson L, Kriebel D, Loorbach D (2013) The future of sustainability science: a solutions-oriented research agenda. Sustain Sci 1–8. doi:10.1007/s11625-013-0224-6

  • Montgomery A, Crittenden K (1977) Improving coding reliability for open-ended questions. Public Opin Q 41:235–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris C, Kirwan J (2011) Exploring the ecological dimensions of producer strategies in alternative food networks in the UK. Sociol Rural 51(4):349–369. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00546.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Muenstermann I (2009) Cross boundary farming: can this challenging farming method save the Australian family farm? Rural Soc 19(3):262–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Neales S (2012a) End of the family farm. The Weekend Australian, pp 15–16

  • Neales S (2012b) Growing pains become unbearable. The Australian

  • Neuman WL (2006) Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001) Multifunctionality: towards an analytical framework. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2003) Multifunctionality: the policy implications. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Otte A, Simmering D, Wolters V (2007) Biodiversity at the landscape level: recent concepts and perspectives for multifunctional land use. Landscape Ecol 22(5):639–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter C, Tilzey M (2007) Agricultural multifunctionality, environmental sustainability and the W.T.O.: resistance or accommodation to the neoliberal project for agriculture? Geoforum 38(6):1290–1303

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard B (1999) Australia as the supermarket to Asia? Governments, territory, and political economy in the Australian agri-food system. Rural Sociol 64(2):284–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond CM, Bryan BA, MacDonald DH, Cast A, Strathearn S, Grandgirard A, Kalivas T (2009) Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 68(5):1301–1315. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.12.006

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards C, Bjorkhaug H, Lawrence G, Hickman E (2013) Retailer-driven agricultural restructuring: Australia, the UK and Norway in comparison. Agric Hum Values 30(2):235–245. http://link.springer.com/journal/volumesAndIssues/10460

  • Robinson G (1998) Methods and techniques in human geography. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smailes P, Newman L (eds) (1993) Longer-term prospects for agriculture in the Central Adelaide Hills. University of Adelaide, Department of Geography, Adelaide

    Google Scholar 

  • Smailes PJ (1995) The enigma of social sustainability in rural Australia. Aust Geogr 26(2):140–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Smailes PJ (1997) Socio-economic change and rural morale in South Australia, 1982–1993. J Rural Stud 13(1):19–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Smailes PJ (2002) From rural dilution to multifunctional countryside: some pointers to the future from South Australia. Aust Geogr 33(1):79–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Smailes PJ (2006) Redefining the local: the social organisation of rural space in South Australia, 1982–2006. (Doctor of Philosophy PhD), Flinders University, Adelaide

  • Smailes PJ, Hugo GJ (2003) The Gilbert Valley, South Australia. In: Cocklin C, Alston M (eds) Community sustainability in rural Australia: a question of capital?. Centre for Rural Social Research, Wagga Wagga, pp 65–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Smailes P, Griffin T, Argent N (2014) Demographic change, differential ageing, and public policy in rural and regional Australia: a three-state case study. Geogr Res 52(3):229–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith E (1989) The unchanging American Voter. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman JD (2012) Sustaining sustainability: creating a systems science in a fragmented academy and polarized world. In: Weinstein M, Turner R (eds) Sustainability science. Springer, New York, pp 21–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart D, Schewe RL, McDermott M (2014) Reducing nitrogen fertilizer application as a climate change mitigation strategy: understanding farmer decision-making and potential barriers to change in the US. Land Use Policy 36:210–218. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.08.011

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichy M, Johnson DW, Johnson RT, Roseth CJ (2010) The impact of constructive controversy on moral development. J Appl Soc Psychol 40(4):765–787

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker B (2008) Applying ‘resilience thinking’ for sustainable development. Ecos 142:16

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton J (1992) Making the theoretical case. In: Becker C (ed) What is the case? The foundations of social enquiry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver JC, Munro D (2009) Country living, country dying: rural suicides in New Zealand, 1900–1950. J Soc Hist 42(4):933–961

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiek A, Iwaniec D (2013) Quality criteria for visions and visioning in sustainability science. Sustain Sci 7(1 Supplement):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson G (2001) From productivism to post-productivism… and back again? Exploring the (un)changed natural and mental landscapes of European agriculture. Trans Inst Br Geogr 26(1):77–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson G (2004) The Australian landcare movement: towards post-productivist rural governance? J Rural Stud 20(4):461–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson G (2007) Multifunctional agriculture: a transition theory perspective. CABI, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson GA, Whitehead I (2012) Local rural product as a ‘relic’spatial strategy in globalised rural spaces: evidence from county clare (Ireland). J Rural Stud 28(3):199–207

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission for Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geography, Environment and Population, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia

    Simon J. Fielke & Douglas K. Bardsley

  2. CSIRO Land and Water, Waite Rd., Urrbrae, SA, 5064, Australia

    Simon J. Fielke

Authors
  1. Simon J. Fielke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Douglas K. Bardsley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon J. Fielke.

Additional information

Handled by Iris C. Bohnet, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Australia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fielke, S.J., Bardsley, D.K. Regional agricultural governance in peri-urban and rural South Australia: strategies to improve multifunctionality. Sustain Sci 10, 231–243 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0272-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0272-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation