Abstract
The EuroMaidan protests that shook Ukraine in late 2013 to early 2014 triggered a chain of events that brought numerous changes and challenges for the Ukrainian society. The Ukrainian media landscape has also been affected by the new challenges and impetus for democratization. The post-Maidan period saw both, improvements in the media environment and setbacks. While Ukrainian journalists can benefit from increased media freedom, new progressive legislation and reinvigoration of the democratic debate, many problems still shape the development of the media. Editorial dependence on owners, concentration of mainstream media in the hands of oligarchs, deteriorating quality of content and crisis of professional identity are distinctive features of the post-Maidan media landscape in Ukraine. This paper provides an overview of developments in the Ukrainian media system since the declaration of independence with a special focus on the situation after the EuroMaidan and discusses four major challenges that will impact the transformation of the Ukrainian journalism and media sphere.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andreitsiv, I. (2015a). Dzhynsa “pid kopirku” (Jeansa copy-pasted). MediaSapiens. http://osvita.mediasapiens.ua/monitoring/daily_news/dzhinsa_pid_kopirku/. Accessed March 30, 2016.
Andreitsiv, I. (2015b). Na vybory! Telekenaly na marshi (go elections! TV channels on the move). MediaSapiens. http://osvita.mediasapiens.ua/monitoring/daily_news/na_vibori_telekanali_na_marshi/. Accessed 30. March 2016.
Belyakov, A. (2009). The influence of “censorship by money” on freedom of speech in Ukraine. Journal of Socialist Theory, 37(4), 601–617.
Budivska, H. (2015). Dialog v umovakh viyny? (Dialogue in times of war?). MediaSapiens. http://osvita.mediasapiens.ua/ethics/standards/dialog_v_umovakh_viyni/. Accessed 10. April 2016.
Chornokondtratenko, M., & Orlova, D. (2013). The journalists’ uprising: EuroMaidan in Ukraine. European Journalism Observatory. http://en.ejo.ch/media-politics/press-freedom/journalists-uprising-euromaidan-protests-ukraine (Created March). Accessed 27. March 2016.
Collins, K. (2014). Restoring press freedom in Ukraine with the Yanukovych Leaks. The Wired UK. Retrieved from http://www.informationsociety.co.uk/restoring-press-freedom-in-ukraine-with-the-yanukovych-leaks-wired-uk/. Accessed 29. June 2016.
CPJ (2015). All journalists should be removed from Ukraine’s list of banned individuals. Statement. https://cpj.org/2015/09/all-journalists-should-be-removed-from-ukraines-li.php. Accessed 29. March 2016.
Darden, K. (2001). Blackmail as a tool of state domination: Ukraine under Kuchma. East European Constitutional Review, 10, 2–3.
Detector Media (2016a). Kanal “Inter” nalezhyt Firtashu, Khoroshkovskomu, Lyovochkinu na Pluzhnikoviy (Inter TV channel belongs to Firtash, Khoroshkovsky, Lyovochkin and Pluzhnikova).. http://detector.media/infospace/article/114079/kanal_inter_nalezhit_firtashu_horoshkovskomu_lovochkinu_ta_pluzhnikoviij/. Accessed 10. April 2016.
Detector Media (2016b). Komu nalezhat’ top-6 ukrayinskykh telekanaliv: siurpryzy vid “Intera” ta “1+1” (Whom do the top-6 Ukrainian TV channels belong: surprises from Inter and 1+1).. http://detector.media/infospace/article/114084/komu_nalezhat_top-6_ukrayinskih_telekanaliv_sjurprizi_vid_intera_ta_11/. Accessed 7. June 2016.
Dorosh, M. (2014). Perekonannia chy standarty? (Beliefs or standards?). MediaSapiens. http://osvita.mediasapiens.ua/go_telekrytyka/diyalnist/zvity/perekonannya_chi_standarti/. Accessed 10. April 2016.
Dorosh, M. (2014a). “Telekanaly nepravylno rozumiyut hromadiansku pozytsiyu”. Monitoryng AUP (“TV Channels get citizenship wrong”. Monitoring of AUP). MediaSapiens. http://osvita.mediasapiens.ua/monitoring/daily_news/telekanali_nepravilno_rozumiyut_gromadyansku_pozitsiyu_monitoring_aup/. Accessed 29. March 2016.
Dorosh, M. (2014b). Telenovyny demonstruyut rekordno nyzki standarty. Monitoryng AUP (TV news show record low standards. Monitoring of AUP). MediaSapiens. http://osvita.mediasapiens.ua/monitoring/daily_news/telenovini_demonstruyut_rekordno_nizki_standarti_monitoring_aup/. Accessed 29. March 2016.
Dovzhenko, M. (2014b). Zhurnalistyka i hromadskyi aktyvizm u nesterylnykh umovakh (Journalism and civic activism in nonsterile conditions). MediaSapiens. http://osvita.mediasapiens.ua/ethics/standards/zhurnalistika_i_gromadskiy_aktivizm_u_nesterilnikh_umovakh/. Accessed 10. April 2016.
Dovzhenko, M. (2015b). Ne boyatysia siroho vovka: hromadianskyi mediaaktyvizm v Ukrayini (Not to be afraid of a grey wolf: civic media activism in Ukraine). School of Journalism at the Ukrainian Catholic University. http://journalism.ucu.edu.ua/program-highlights/4615/. Accessed 10. April 2016.
Dovzhenko, O. (2008). Ukrayinski media siohodni: z haremu v bordel (Ukrainian media today: from harem to brothel). Dzerkalo Tyzhnia. http://gazeta.dt.ua/POLITICS/ukrayinski_media_sogodni_z_garemu_v_bordel.html. Accessed 29. June 2016.
Dovzhenko, O. (2010). Zasoby Masovoyi Agitaciyi. Mediynyi Vymir Prezydentskoyi Vyborchoi Kampaniyi 2009–2010: Promizhni Pidsumky (Mass media as propaganda machines. Media dimension of presidential election campaign of 2009–2010: preliminary conclusions). Telekrytyka. http://www.telekritika.ua/medialiteracy/2010-01-15/50432. Accessed 27. March 2016.
Dovzhenko, O. (2014a). Novyny z Donbasu – vinegret iz propagandy, dezy, chutok ta ofitsiozu (News from Donbas – a blend of propaganda, disinformation, rumours and official narrative). MediaSapiens. http://osvita.mediasapiens.ua/monitoring/daily_news/novini_z_donbasu_vinegret_iz_propagandi_dezi_chutok_ta_ofitsiozu/. Accessed 29. March 2016.
Dovzhenko, O. (2015a). Media after Maidan. OpenDemocracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/od-russia/otar-dovzhenko/media-in-ukraine-set-free-to-be-slaves. Accessed 30. March 2016.
Dovzhenko, O. (2016). Pyat’ krokiv nazustrich zdorovomu gluzdu (5 steps towards common sense). Detector Media. http://detector.media/community/article/112713/piat_krokiv_nazustrich_zdorovomu_gluzdu/. Accessed 10. April 2016.
Dovzhenko, O., & Ligachova, N. (Eds.) (2006). Dzhynsova svoboda. Rol’ media u parlamentskiy vyborchiy kampaniyi-2006 (“Jeansa” freedom. The role of the media in the parliamentary election campaign-2006). Kyiv: Vistka.
Dutsyk, D. (2005). Politychna zhurnalistyka (Political Journalism). Kyiv: Kyiv-Mohyla Academy Publishing House.
Dyczok, M. (2006). Was Kuchma’s censorship effective? Mass media in ukraine before 2004. Europe-Asia Studies, 58(2), 215–238.
Dyczok, M. (2009). Do the media matter? Focus on ukraine. In M. Dyczok, & O. Gaman-Golutvina (Eds.), Media, democracy and freedom. The post-communist experience. Bern: Peter Lang.
Ekonomichna Pravda (2016). Kanaly Pinchuka pokazaly svoyu strukturu vlasnosti (Pinchuk’s TV channels published their ownership structure).. http://www.epravda.com.ua/news/2016/04/5/588409/. Accessed 10. April 2016.
Facebook (2013). Statement of Investgazeta editorial. https://www.facebook.com/deloTOP100/posts/708942142450760. Accessed 25. March 2016.
Freedom House (1999). Country report 1999. Ukraine. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/1999/ukraine. Accessed 17. March 2016.
Freedom House (2011). Freedom in the world. Ukraine. Country report. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2011/ukraine?page=22&year=2011&country=8156. Accessed 27. March 2016.
Freedom House (2015). Freedom of the press ranking. Ukraine. Country Report. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/2015/ukraine. Accessed 29. March 2016.
Gromadzki, G., Movchan, V., & Riabchuk, M. et al. (2010). Beyond colours: assets and liabilities of ‘post-orange’ Ukraine. Kyiv Warsaw: Stefan Batory Foundation.
Horobets, V., & Bukhtatyy, O. (2016). Komunal’na presa Ukrayiny: Otsinka gotovnosti do reformy (Municipal press of Ukraine: estimation of readiness for reforms). MediaSapiens. http://osvita.mediasapiens.ua/print/1411980811/komunalna_presa_ukraini_otsinka_gotovnosti_do_reformi/. Accessed 16. March 2016.
KAS (2015). Ukrainian Media Landscape – 2015. Policy Paper.. http://www.kas.de/wf/doc/kas_43639-1522-13-30.pdf?151209161127. Accessed 27. March 2016.
Korol, D., Vinnichuk, Y., & Kosenko, D. (2015). Informatsiya – zbroya: komu nalezhat ukrayinski ZMI (Information is weapon: to whom Ukrainian mass media belong). Insider. http://www.theinsider.ua/infographics/2014/2015_smi/vlasnyky.html. Accessed 30. March 2016.
Kovalchuk, A. (2014). Chomu Sanoma zalyshaye ukrayinsky mediarynok (Why is Sanoma leaving Ukrainian market). Forbes Ukraine. http://forbes.net.ua/ua/business/1383063-chomu-sanoma-zalishae-ukrayinskij-mediarinok. Accessed 6. April 2016.
Krasnoboka, N., & Semetko, H. A. (2006). Murder, journalism and the web. In S. Oates, D. Owen, & R. Gibson (Eds.), The Internet and politics: citizens, voters and activists. London: Routledge.
Krasnoboka, N., & Brants, K. (2006). Old and new media, old and new politics? On- and offline reporting in the 2002 ukrainian election campaign. In K. Voltmer (Ed.), Mass media and political communication in new democracies. London: Routledge.
Kulyk, V. (2010). Dyskurs ukrayinskykh mediy: identychnosti, ideolohiyi, vladni stosunky (The ukrainian media discourse: identities, ideologies, power relations). Kyiv: Krytyka.
Leshchenko, S. (2015). Sunset and/or sunrise of the ukrainian oligarchs after the Maidan. In A. Wilson (Ed.), What does Ukraine think? European Council on Foreign Relations. http://www.ecfr.eu/page/-/WHAT_DOES_UKRAINE_THINK_pdf.pdf.
Ligachova, N. (2015). MediaOBOZ ili mediaAVANGARD? (Media Waggon-train or media Avantgarde?). MediaSapiens. http://osvita.mediasapiens.ua/trends/1411978127/mediaoboz_ili_mediaavangard/. Accessed 30. March 2016.
Ligachova, N., & Ganzha, L. (2005). Zhurnalistska revoliutsiya 2004: Podiyi, liudy, dyskusiyi (journalist revolution 2004: events, people, discussions). Kyiv: Telekrytyka.
Lyachinskaya, O. (2016). Revoliutsii ne sluchilos: ukrayinskiye SMI ostayutsia v tekh zhe rukakh (No revolution: Ukrainian mass media remain in the same hands). MyMedia.org.ua. http://mymedia.org.ua/konkurs/ukraina/objective/vladeltsy_ukr_smi.html. Accessed 30. March 2016.
MediaSapiens (2014). Pershyi natsionalnyi perestav buty tendentsiynym (First National TV channel stopped being biased).. http://osvita.mediasapiens.ua/monitoring/daily_news/pershiy_natsionalniy_perestav_buti_tendentsiynim/. Accessed 10. April 2016.
MediaSapiens (2015a). Dva roky pospil ukrayintsi naybilshe ne doviriayut rosiyskym ZMI – doslidzhennia Fondu “Demokratychni Initsiatyvy” (Two years in a row Ukrainians have least trust to Russian mass media – a study by the Democratic Initiative Foundation).. http://osvita.mediasapiens.ua/mediaprosvita/research/dva_roki_pospil_ukraintsi_naybilshe_ne_doviryayut_rosiyskim_zmi_doslidzhennya/. Accessed 29. March 2016.
MediaSapiens (2015b). Rada ukhvalyla zakon pro rozderzhavlennia presy (Parliament passed a law on privatization of the press).. http://osvita.mediasapiens.ua/media_law/law/rada_ukhvalila_zakon_pro_rozderzhavlennya_presi/. Accessed 30. March 2016.
MediaSapiens (2015c). Monitoryng telenovyn: Na fronti obslugovuvannia oligarkhiv bez zmin (Monitoring of TV news: no changes in terms of serving oligarchs).. http://osvita.mediasapiens.ua/monitoring/monitoring_overview/monitoring_telenovin_na_fronti_obslugovuvannya_oligarkhiv_bez_zmin/. Accessed 30. March 2016.
MediaSapiens (2016). Vysvitlennia konfliktu v ukrayinskykh media: ustanovky, praktyky, poshuk rishen’ (rezultaty doslidzhennia) (Coverage of conflict in Ukrainian media: attitudes, practices, search of solutions (study findings). http://osvita.mediasapiens.ua/mediaprosvita/research/visvitlennya_konfliktu_v_ukrainskikh_media_ustanovki_praktiki_poshuk_rishen_rezultati_doslidzhennya/. Accessed 10. April 2016.
MOP (2015). Media Ownership Project. Ukraine. Retrieved from https://www.reportingproject.net/media/author/ukraine/. Accessed 29. June 2016.
MSI (2011). Media sustainability index 2011. Ukraine. Retrieved from www.irex.org/sites/default/files/EE_MSI_2011_Ukraine.pdf. Accessed 16. March 2016.
MSI (2015). Media sustainability index 2015. Ukraine. https://www.irex.org/sites/default/files/2015-msi-ukraine.pdf. Accessed 16. March 2016.
MyMedia.org (2015). Media after “Maidan”: 9 findings of Brian Bonner. http://mymedia.org.ua/en/articles/reformy/madia_after_revolution.html. Accessed 29. March 2016.
Orlova, D., & Sydorenko, V. (2015). Ukraine’s press freedom threatened by oligarchs. European journalism observatory. http://en.ejo.ch/media-politics/ukraines-press-freedom-threatened-by-oligarchs. Accessed 30. March 2016.
OSCE (2001). “Censorship by killing” must end. Statement. http://www.osce.org/fom/53291. Accessed 16. March 2016.
OSCE (2014a). OSCE media freedom representative concerned about new steps to restrict media plurality in Ukraine. Statement. http://www.osce.org/fom/116312. Accessed 29. March 2016.
OSCE (2014b). OSCE Representative urges authorities in Ukraine to respect media after raid on Vesti newspaper. Statement. http://www.osce.org/fom/123521. Accessed 29. March 2016.
OSCE (2015a). OSCE media freedom representative welcomes print media privatization law in Ukraine. Statement. http://www.osce.org/fom/203431. Accessed 30. March 2016.
OSCE (2015b). OSCE media freedom representative deplores sanctions in Ukraine banning entry of journalists. Statement. http://www.osce.org/fom/182661. Accessed 29. March 2016.
OSCE (2015c). OSCE representative welcomes law on transparency of media ownership in Ukraine as it comes into force. Statement. http://www.osce.org/fom/187956. Accessed 30. March 2016.
Ostapa, S. (2015a). Zupynyty reformu suspilnogo movlennia v Ukrayini vzhe nemozhlyvo. Khiba scho zagalmuvaty (Reform of public broadcasting in Ukraine cannot be stopped anymore. Only slowed down). MediaSapiens. http://stv.mediasapiens.ua/dosvid/ekspertna_dumka/zupiniti_reformu_suspilnogo_movlennya_v_ukraini_vzhe_nemozhlivo_khiba_scho_zagalmuvati/. Accessed 30. March 2016.
Ostapa, S. (2015b). Zakon pro prozorist mediavlasnosti: chy diznayemosia, “khto komu Rabinovych” (Law on transparency of media ownership: will we find out “who is Rabinovych to whom”). MediaSapiens. http://osvita.mediasapiens.ua/media_law/law/zakon_pro_prozorist_mediavlasnosti_chi_diznaemosya_khto_komu_rabinovich/. Accessed 30. March 2016.
Ostapa, S. (2016a). Natalia Gumenyuk: “Novyny “Hromadskogo telebachennia” mayut buty zolotym standartom yakosti” (Natalia Gumenyuk: “News of Hromadske TV have to be a golden standard of quality”). MediaSapiens. http://stv.mediasapiens.ua/reformuvannya/internet/natalya_gumenyuk_kiiv_mae_buti_vazhlivim_mistom_na_mapi_rosiyskomovnikh_media/. Accessed 10. April 2016.
Ostapa, S. (2016b). Oleksandr Kharebin: Derzhavni movnyky vykorystovuvaly koruptsiyni skhemy (Oleksandr Kharebin: state broadcasters employed corruption schemes). MediaSapiens. http://stv.mediasapiens.ua/reformuvannya/movlennya/oleksandr_kharebin_derzhavni_movniki_ vikoristovuvali_koruptsiyni_skhemi/. Accessed 7. June 2016.
Parliamentary Assembly (1999). Ad hoc committee to observe the presidential elections in Ukraine (31 october and 14 november 1999). Statement. http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/X2H-Xref-ViewHTML.asp?FileID=8813&lang=en. Accessed 25. March 2016.
Reporters without Borders (2010). Press freedom in Ukraine: temptation to control. Country report. https://rsf.org/sites/default/files/_rapport_ukraine_anglais.pdf. Accessed 27. March 2016.
Richter, A. (2002). Ukraine’s post-communist media. In M. E. Price, B. Rozumilowicz, & S. G. Verhulst (Eds.), Media reform: democratizing the media, democratizing the state. London: Routledge.
Ryabinska, N. (2011). The media market and media ownership in post-communist Ukraine: impact on media independence and pluralism. Problems of Post-Communism, 58(6), 3–20.
Shvadchak, N. (2015). Scho treba znaty pro reformu derzhavnykh ta munitsypalnykh ZMI (What we need to know about reform of state and communal media). Telekrytyka. http://www.telekritika.ua/drukovani-zmi-vlasnist/print/112670. Accessed 30. March 2016.
Stelmakh, B. (2015). Zhurnalist VS hromadskyi aktyvist (Journalist vs. civic activist). Institute of Mass Information. http://imi.org.ua/analytics/47510-jurnalist-vs-gromadskiy-aktivist.html. Accessed 10. April 2016.
Szostek, J. (2014). The media battles of Ukraine’s EuroMaidan. Digital Icons: Studies in Russian, Eurasian and Central European New Media, 11, 1–19.
Telekrytyka (2014a). Kurchenko kupyv mediakholdyng UMH group ne zarady prybutkiv – Kateryna Kobernyk (Kurchenko bought UMH group not for profit – Kateryna Kobernyk).. http://www.telekritika.ua/kontent/2014-01-02/89016. Accessed 30. March 2016.
Telekrytyka (2014b). U 2015 rotsi ukrayinskyi reklamnyi rynok zmenshytsia na 5 %, u 2014 – na 20 % – ZenithOptimedia (In 2015 Ukrainian advertising market will decrease by 5 %, in 2014 – by 20 %).. http://www.telekritika.ua/rinok/2014-12-08/101294. Accessed 6. April 2016.
Telekrytyka (2015). Verkhovnu Radu zaklykayut ukhvalyty zakon pro rozderzhavlennia (Activists call on Verkhovna Rada to pass the law on privatization of media). http://www.telekritika.ua/pravo/2015-09-17/111275. Accessed 30. March 2016.
Tolokolnikova, K. (2015). Unykannia movy vorozhnechi nablyzyt’ myr (Avoidance of hate speech will bring peace closer). MediaSapiens. http://osvita.mediasapiens.ua/ethics/standards/unikannya_movi_vorozhnechi_nablizit_mir/. Accessed 10. April 2016.
U-Media (2015). Ukrayintsi postupovo vidmovliayutsia vid spozhyvannia rosiyskykh ZMI (Ukrainians gradually turn away from consuming Russian mass media). Survey report. http://umedia.kiev.ua/meda-demokratya/dosldz/700-ukrayinc-postupovo-vdmovlyayutsya-vd-spozhivannya-rosyskih-zm.html#.V1YGHGaM0S9. Accessed 7. June 2016.
Verstiuk, I. (2016). Dyktatura reklamy. Yak ukrayinski ZMI vyzhyvayut pry padayuchiy ekonomici (Dictatorship of advertising. How Ukrainian mass media survive at times of economic decline). Novoe Vremya. http://nv.ua/ukr/publications/diktatura-reklami-jak-ukrajinski-zmi-vizhivajut-pri-padajuchij-ekonomitsi-92861.html. Accessed 10. April 2016.
Way, L. (2005). Kuchma’s failed authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 16(2), 131–145.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Orlova, D. Ukrainian media after the EuroMaidan: in search of independence and professional identity. Publizistik 61, 441–461 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-016-0282-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-016-0282-8