What can we learn from the collapse of the European constitutional project?
- Andrew Moravcsik
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The draft European constitution sought to legitimate the EU by inducing more popular deliberation about Europe’s future. This strategy was doomed to failure because it is inconsistent with basic empirical social science about how advanced democracies work. Salient political rhetoric and increased opportunities to participate do not, as a rule, generate more intensive and informed public deliberation or greater public trust, identity and legitimacy — particularly where the issues in question are not highly salient. Two conclusions follow. First, the failure of constitutional reform is, paradoxically, evidence of the success and stability of the existing “European constitutional settlement.” The rhetoric of federalism has not changed to reflect this new reality. Second, prescriptive analysis of real-world constitutional reform requires that normative theorists draw more heavily on empirical social science in order to ascertain to what extent institutions actually have the consequences ideally ascribed to them.
Bartels, Larry, 2001: An Agenda for Voting Research, in: Katz, Elihu/Warshel, Yael (eds.), Election Studies: What’s Their Use? Boulder, CO, 59-81.
Blondel, Jean/Sinnott, Richard/Svensson, Palle, 1998: People and Parliament in the European Union: Participation, Democracy, Legitimacy. Oxford.
Brouard, Sylvain/ Tiberj, Vincent, 2006: YES to the Europe I want; NO to this one. Some Reflection on France’s Rejection of the EU Constitution, in: Political Science and Politics 39, 261–268.
Duff, Andrew, 2006: The Struggle for Europe’s Constitution. London.
EU Observer, 30th April 2006: Western Europe remains wary of new member state workers, at: http://euobserver.com/9/21469/?rk=1.
Gibson, James L./Caldeira, Gregory A., 1993: Legitimacy, Judicial Power, and Emerging Transnational Legal Institutions: The Court of Justice in the European Community. Unpublished paper at the University of Houston.
Grant, Ruth W./ Keohane, Robert, 2005: Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics, in: American Political Science Review 99, 1–15.CrossRef
De Grauwe, Paul/ Polan, Magdalena, 2005: Globalization and Social Spending, in: Pacific Economic Review 10, 105–123.CrossRef
Guiraudon, Virginie, 2004: Immigration and Asylum: A Political Equilibrium? Paper delivered at conference on The European Union and the New Constitution: A Stable Political Equilibrium? Princeton.
Habermas, Jürgen, 2001: Why Europe Needs a Constitution, in: New Left Review 11, 5–26.
Habermas, Jürgen, 2005: Nach den Abstimmungs-Debakeln. Europa ist uns über die Köpfe hinweggerollt, in: Süddeutsche Zeitung 6th June 2005, at: http://www.sueddeutsche.de/kultur/artikel/383/54329/.
Hix, Simon/Noury, Abdul G., 2006: After Enlargement: Voting Patterns in the Sixth European Parliament. Paper presented at the Federal Trust conference on The European Parliament and the European Political Space. London.
Hooghe, Liesbet/ Marks, Gary, 2006: Europe’s Blues: Theoretical Soul-Searching after the Rejection of the European Constitutuion, in: Political Science and Politics 39, 247–250.
Imig, Doug/Tarrow, Sidney, 2001: Contentious Europeans: Protest and Politics in an Emerging European Polity. Lanham, MD.
Iversen, Torben/Pontusson, Jonas/Soskice, David (eds.), 1999: Unions, Employers, and Central Banks: Macroeconomic Coordination and Institutional Change in Social Market Economics. Cambridge.
Jacobs, Lawrence R./Shapiro, Robert Y., 2000: Politicians Don’t Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness. Chicago.
Joerges, Christian/Vos, Ellen (eds.), 1999: EU Committees: Social Regulation, Law and Politics. Oxford.
Majone, Giandomenico, 2005: Dilemmas of European Integration: The Ambiguities and Pitfalls of Integration by Stealth. Oxford.
Moravcsik, Andrew, 2000: De Gaulle between Grain and Grandeur: The Political Economy of French EC Policy, 1958–1970. Part 2, in: Journal of Cold War Studies 2, 4–68.CrossRef
Moravcsik, Andrew, 2002: In Defence of the Democratic Deficit: Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union, in: Journal of Common Market Studies 40, 603–624.CrossRef
Moravcsik, Andrew, 2004: Is there a ‘Democratic Deficit’ in World Politics? A Framework for Analysis, in: Government and Opposition 39, 603–624.CrossRef
Moravcsik, Andrew, 2005a. The European Constitutional Compromise and the Neofunctionalist Legacy, in: Journal of European Public Policy 12, 349–386.
Moravcsik, Andrew, 2005b: The European Constitutional Compromise, in: EUSA Review 18, 1–6.
Nagel, Thomas, 2005: The Problem of Global Justice, in: Philosophy and Public Affairs 33, 113–147.CrossRef
Norman, Peter, 2006: The Accidental Constitution. Brussels.
Norris, Pippa, 2001: The Global Generation: The Cohort Support for European Governance, at: http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~pnorris/Acrobat/Global%20Generation%20Brussels.pdf.
Page, Benjamin I./Shapiro, Robert Y., 1992: The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago.
Pettit, Phillip, 2004: Depoliticizing Democracy, in: Ratio Juris 17, 52–65.CrossRef
Pierson, Paul/Leibfried, Stephan (eds.), 1995: European Social Policy. Washington D.C.
Pontusson, Jonas, 2006: Inequality and Prosperity: Social Europe vs. Liberal America. Ithaca.
Rabkin, Jeremy, 2005: Law without Nations: Why Constitutional Government Requires Nation States. Princeton.
Rhodes, Martin/ Ferrera, Maurizio/ Hemerijck, Anton, 2001: The Future of the European “Social Model” in the Global Economy, in: Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 3, 163–190.CrossRef
Scharpf, Fritz, 1999: Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford.
Schmitter, Philippe C., 2000: How to Democratize the European Union. And Why Bother? Lanham, MD.
Tarrow, Sidney/Imig, Doug, 2001: Contentious Europeans: Protest and Politics in a Europeanizing Polity. Lanham, MD.
Vogel, David, 1995: Trading Up. Cambridge, MA.
Weiler, Joseph, 1999: The Constitution of Europe. Cambridge.
Zeitlin, Jonathan/Pochet, Philippe/Magnusson, Lars (eds.), 2005: The Open Method of Coordination in Action: The European Employment and Social Inclusion Strategies. Brussels.
Zweifel, Thomas, 2002: Democratic Deficit? Institutions and Regulation in the European Union, Switzerland and the United States. Lanham.
Zweifel, Thomas, 2006: International Organizations and Democracy. Boulder.
- What can we learn from the collapse of the European constitutional project?
Volume 47, Issue 2 , pp 219-241
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
- Additional Links