ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND
Leaders in medical education have called for redesign of internal medicine training to improve ambulatory care training. 4 + 1 block scheduling is one innovative approach to enhance ambulatory education.
AIM
To determine the impact of 4 + 1 scheduling on resident clinic continuity.
SETTING
Resident continuity clinic in traditional scheduling in which clinics are scheduled intermittently one-half day per week, compared to 4 + 1 in which residents alternate 1 week of clinic with 4 weeks of an inpatient rotation or elective.
PARTICIPANTS
First-year internal medicine residents.
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
We measured patient–provider visit continuity, phone triage encounter continuity, and lab follow-up continuity.
PROGRAM EVALUATION
In traditional scheduling as opposed to 4 + 1 scheduling, patients saw their primary resident provider a greater percentage; 71.7 % vs. 63.0 % (p = 0.008). In the 4 + 1 model, residents saw their own patients a greater percentage; 52.1 % vs. 37.1 % (p = 0.0001). Residents addressed their own labs more often in 4 + 1 model; 90.7 % vs. 75.6 % (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in handling of triage encounters; 42.3 % vs. 35.8 % (p = 0.12).
DISCUSSION
4 + 1 schedule improves visit continuity from a resident perspective, and may compromise visit continuity from the patient perspective, but allows for improved laboratory follow-up, which we pose should be part of an emerging modern definition of continuity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Fitzgibbons J, Bordley D, Berkowitz L, Miller B, Henderson M. Redesigning residency education in internal medicine: a position paper from the association of program directors in internal medicine. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(12):920–926.
Meyers F, Weinberger S, Fitzgibbons J, Glassroth J, Duffy D, Clayton C. Redesigning residency training in internal medicine: the consensus report of the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine Education Redesign Task Force. Acad Med. 2007;82(12):1211–1219.
Thomas KG, West CP, Popkave C, Bellini LM, Weinberger SE, Kolars JC, et al. Alternative approaches to ambulatory training: internal medicine residents’ and program directors’ perspectives. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24:904–10.
Holmboe E, Bowen J, Green M, et al. Reforming internal medicine residency training: a report from the Society of General Internal Medicine’s Task force for Residency Reform. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(12):1165–1172.
Bowen J, Salerno S, Chamberlain J, Eckstrom E, Chen H, Brandenburg S. Changing habits of practice: transforming internal medicine residency education in ambulatory settings. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(12):1181–1187.
Keirns CC, Bosk CL. The unintended consequences of training residents in dysfunctional outpatient settings. Acad Med. 2008;83(5):498–502.
Mariotti JL, Shalaby M, Fitzgibbons JP. The 4:1 schedule: a novel template for internal medicine residencies. J Grad Med Educ. 2010;2:541–547.
Warm EJ, Schauer DP, Diers T, et al. The ambulatory long-block: an accreditation council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Educational Innovations Project (EIP). J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(7):921–926.
Chaudhry SI, Balwan S, Friedman KA, et al. Moving forward in GME reform: a 4 + 1 model of resident ambulatory training. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(8):1100–4.
Saultz J, Albedaiwi W. Interpersonal continuity of care and patient satisfaction: a critical review. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(5):445–451.
Blankfield RP, Kelly RB, Alemagno SA, King CM. Continuity of care in a family practice residency program. Impact on physician satisfaction. J Fam Pract. 1990;31(1):69–73.
Strange K. In this issue: continuity of care. Ann Fam Med. 2003;1(3):130–131.
Saultz J. Defining and measuring interpersonal continuity of care. Ann Fam Med. 2003;1(3):134–143.
Rosenblatt R, Wright G, Baldwin L, et al. The effect of the doctor patient relationship on emergency department use among the elderly. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(1):97–102.
Cabana MD, Jee SH. Does continuity of care improve patient outcomes? J Fam Pract. 2004;53(12):974–980.
Saultz JW, Lochner J. Interpersonal continuity of care and care outcomes: a critical review. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3(2):159–66.
Wieland ML, Halvorsen AJ, Chaudhry R, et al. An evaluation of internal medicine residency continuity clinic redesign to a 50/50 outpatient-inpatient model. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(8):1014–9.
Haggerty J, Reid R, Freeman G, Starfield B, Adair C, McKendry R. Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ. 2003;327(425):1219–1221.
Breslau N, Reeb KG. Continuity of care in a university-based practice. J Med Educ. 1975;50:965–969.
Bowen, J. Personal Communication.
Acknowledgements
Contributors
None.
Funders
Colorado Health Foundation. There is no grant number; this funding has a Memorandum of Understanding between the Colorado Health Foundation and the University of Colorado Department of Medicine.
Prior Presentations
Poster Presentation on 4 October 2013 at the Fall Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine (APDIM) Conference.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heist, K., Guese, M., Nikels, M. et al. Impact of 4 + 1 Block Scheduling on Patient Care Continuity in Resident Clinic. J GEN INTERN MED 29, 1195–1199 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2750-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2750-4