National Study of Health Insurance Type and Reasons for Emergency Department Use
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The rates of emergency department (ED) utilization vary substantially by type of health insurance, but the association between health insurance type and patient-reported reasons for seeking ED care is unknown.
We evaluated the association between health insurance type and self-perceived acuity or access issues among individuals discharged from the ED.
This was a cross-sectional analysis of the 2011 National Health Interview Survey. Adults whose last ED visit did not result in hospitalization (n = 4,606) were asked structured questions about reasons for seeking ED care. We classified responses as 1) perceived need for immediate evaluation (acuity issues), or 2) barriers to accessing outpatient services (access issues).
We analyzed survey-weighted data using multivariable logistic regression models to test the association between health insurance type and reasons for ED visits, while adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics.
Overall, 65.0 % (95 % CI 63.0–66.9) of adults reported ≥ 1 acuity issue and 78.9 % (95 % CI 77.3–80.5) reported ≥ 1 access issue. Among those who reported no acuity issue leading to the most recent ED visit, 84.2 % reported ≥ 1 access issue. Relative to those with private insurance, adults with Medicaid (OR 1.05; 95 % CI 0.79–1.40) and those with Medicare (OR 0.98; 95 % CI 0.66–1.47) were similarly likely to seek ED care due to an acuity issue. Adults with Medicaid (OR 1.50; 95 % CI 1.06–2.13) and Medicaid + Medicare (dual eligible) (OR 1.94; 95 % CI 1.18–3.19) were more likely than those with private insurance to seek ED care for access issues.
Variability in reasons for seeking ED care among discharged patients by health insurance type may be driven more by lack of access to alternate care, rather than by differences in patient-perceived acuity. Policymakers should focus on increasing access to alternate sites of care, particularly for Medicaid beneficiaries, as well as strategies to increase care coordination that involve ED patients and providers.
- Tang, N, Stein, J, Hsia, RY, Maselli, JH, Gonzales, R (2010) Trends and characteristics of US emergency department visits, 1997–2007. JAMA 304: pp. 664-670 CrossRef
- Kellermann, AL (1994) Nonurgent emergency department visits. Meeting an unmet need. JAMA 271: pp. 1953-1954 CrossRef
- Cheung, PT, Wiler, JL, Lowe, RA, Ginde, AA (2012) National study of barriers to timely primary care and emergency department utilization among Medicaid beneficiaries. Ann Emerg Med 60: pp. 4-10 CrossRef
- Lowe, RA, Fu, R, Ong, ET (2009) Community characteristics affecting emergency department use by Medicaid enrollees. Med Care 47: pp. 15-22 CrossRef
- Masso, M, Bezzina, AJ, Siminski, P, Middleton, R, Eagar, K (2007) Why patients attend emergency departments for conditions potentially appropriate for primary care: reasons given by patients and clinicians differ. Emerg Med Australasia : EMA 19: pp. 333-340 CrossRef
- Kangovi, S, Barg, FK, Carter, T, Long, JA, Shannon, R, Grande, D (2013) Understanding why patients of low socioeconomic status prefer hospitals over ambulatory care. Health Aff (Millwood). 32: pp. 1196-1203 CrossRef
- Decker, SL (2012) In 2011 nearly one-third of physicians said they would not accept new Medicaid patients, but rising fees may help. Health Aff (Millwood). 31: pp. 1673-1679 CrossRef
- Stern, RS, Weissman, JS, Epstein, AM (1991) The emergency department as a pathway to admission for poor and high-cost patients. JAMA 266: pp. 2238-2243 CrossRef
- Sommers AS, Boukus ER, Carrier E. Dispelling myths about emergency department use: majority of Medicaid visits are for urgent or more serious symptoms. Res Brief. 2012(23):1–10, 11–13.
- Holahan J, Carroll C, Dorn S. The cost and coverage implications of the ACA Medicaid expansion: national and state-by-state analysis. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. 2012. http://www.kff.org/medicaid/8384.cfm. Accessed November 7, 2013.
- Centers for Disease and Control Prevention. National Health Interview Survey. www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/quest_data_related_1997_forward.htm. Accessed November 7, 2013.
- Gindi RM, Cohen RA, Kirzinger WK. Emergency room use among adults aged 18–64: early release of estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, January–June 2011. 2012. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/emergency_room_use_january-june_2011.pdf. Accessed November 7, 2013.
- HRSA. Efforts to divert non-urgent ER use to alternate providers, focusing on providing better care at lower costs. http://www.hhs.gov/asl/testify/2011/05/t20110511a.html. Accessed November 7, 2013.
- Young, GP, Wagner, MB, Kellermann, AL, Ellis, J, Bouley, D (1996) Ambulatory visits to hospital emergency departments: patterns and reasons for use 24 Hours in the ED Study Group. JAMA 276: pp. 460-465 CrossRef
- Lasser, KE, Kronman, AC, Cabral, H, Samet, JH (2012) Emergency department use by primary care patients at a safety-net hospital. Arch Intern Med 172: pp. 278-280 CrossRef
- Billings J, Parikh N, Mijanovich T. Emergency department use in New York City: a substitute for primary care? Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2000(433):1–5.
- Billings J, Parikh N, Mijanovich T. Emergency department use in New York City: a survey of Bronx patients. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2000(435):1–5.
- Raven, MC, Lowe, RA, Maselli, J, Hsia, RY (2013) Comparison of presenting complaint vs discharge diagnosis for identifying “nonemergency” emergency department visits. JAMA 309: pp. 1145-1153 CrossRef
- Rust, G, Ye, J, Baltrus, P, Daniels, E, Adesunloye, B, Fryer, GE (2008) Practical barriers to timely primary care access: impact on adult use of emergency department services. Arch Intern Med 168: pp. 1705-1710 CrossRef
- Pines, JM, Mutter, RL, Zocchi, MS (2013) Variation in emergency department admission rates across the United States. Med Care Res Rev 70: pp. 218-31 CrossRef
- Cunningham, PJ (2006) What accounts for differences in the use of hospital emergency departments across U.S. communities?. Health Aff (Millwood). 25: pp. w324-336 CrossRef
- Grumbach, K, Keane, D, Bindman, A (1993) Primary care and public emergency department overcrowding. Am J Public Health 83: pp. 372-378 CrossRef
- Ginde, AA, Lowe, RA, Wiler, JL (2012) Health insurance status change and emergency department use among US adults. Arch Intern Med 172: pp. 642-647 CrossRef
- Freeman, HP, Rodriguez, RL (2011) History and principles of patient navigation. Cancer 117: pp. 3539-3542
- ED navigators steer patients to appropriate providers. Hosp Case Manag. 2012;20(3):43–44.
- ED navigators prevent unnecessary admissions. Hosp Case Manag. 2012;20(2):22, 27.
- Brenner J. Camden Coalition Program. 2012; http://www.camdenhealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Charges-Hotspots.pdf. Accessed November 7, 2013.
- National Study of Health Insurance Type and Reasons for Emergency Department Use
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 29, Issue 4 , pp 621-627
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12401 E. 17th Avenue, B-215, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
- 2. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation-Clinical Scholars and Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA