Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Physicians as Part of the Solution? Community-Based Participatory Research as a Way to Get Shared Decision Making into Practice

  • Perspective
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

Although support among policy makers and academics for the wide scale adoption of shared decision making (SDM) is growing, actual implementation is slow, and faces many challenges. Extensive systemic barriers exist that prevent physicians from being able to champion SDM and lead practice change. In other areas of public health where implementation has been a challenge, community-based participatory research (CBPR) has effectively engaged resistant stakeholders to improve practice and the delivery of care. Might CBPR, defined broadly as research that engages participants in the conception, design, and implementation of relevant health programs, be a more effective way to engage physicians, patients, and managers in the implementation process? Consequently, we argue that adopting a participatory approach may help to overcome recognized barriers to progress in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making—the pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(9):780–781.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Oshima Lee E, Emanuel EJ. Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(1):6–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Légaré F, Ratté S, Gravel K, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: Update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(3):526–535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Elwyn G, Grande S, Gittel J, Godfrey M, Vidal D, eds. Are we there yet? Case studies of implementing decision support for patients. Hanover: Trustees of Dartmouth College; 2013:135.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Elwyn G, Scholl I, Mann M, et al. The implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice: A systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis. 2013;In Press.

  6. Légaré F, Witteman HO. Shared decision making: Examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice. Health Affair. 2013;32(2):276–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Collins ED, Moore CP, Clay KF, et al. Can women with early-stage breast cancer make an informed decision for mastectomy? J Clin Oncol. 2008;27(4):519–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Arterburn D, Wellman R, Westbrook E, et al. Introducing decision aids at Group Health was linked to sharply lower hip and knee surgery rates and costs. Health Affair. 2012;31(9):2094–2104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Frosch DL, May SG, Rendle KA, Tietbohl C, Elwyn G. Authoritarian physicians and patients’ fear of being labeled “difficult” among key obstacles to shared decision making. Health Affair. 2012;31(5):1030–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Faridi Z, Grunbaum JA, Gray BS, Franks A, Simoes E. Community-based participatory research: Necessary next steps. Prev Chronic Dis. 2007;4(3):A70.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cook WK. Integrating research and action: A systematic review of community-based participatory research to address health disparities in environmental and occupational health in the USA. J Epidemio Commun H. 2008;62(8):668–76.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Israel BA, Coombe CM, Cheezum RR, et al. Community-based participatory research: A capacity-building approach for policy advocacy aimed at eliminating health disparities. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(11):2094–102.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Minkler M, Blackwell AG, Thompson M, Tamir H. Community-based participatory research: Implications for public health funding. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(8):1210–3.

  14. Minkler M, Thompson M, Bell J, Rose K. Contributions of community involvement to organizational-level empowerment: The federal healthy start experience. Health Educ Behav. 2001;28(6):783–807.

  15. Elwyn G, Llyod A, Joseph-Williams N. Option Grids: Shared decision making made easier. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;90(2):207–212.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Montori VM, Breslin M, Maleska M, Weymiller AJ. Creating a conversation: Insights from the development of a decision aid. PLoS Med. 2007;4(8):e233.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Caldon LJM, Collins KA, Reed MW, et al. Clinicians’ concerns about decision support interventions for patients facing breast cancer surgery options: Understanding the challenge of implementing shared decision-making. Health Expect. 2011;14(2):133–46.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Walker AE, Thomas RE. Changing physicians’ behavior: What works and thoughts on getting more things to work. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2002;22(4):237–43.

  19. Parker EA, Israel BA, Robins TG, et al. Evaluation of Community Action Against Asthma: A community health worker intervention to improve children’s asthma-related health by reducing household environmental triggers for asthma. Health Educ Behav. 2008;35(3):376–95.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jones L, Wells K. Strategies for academic and clinician engagement in community-participatory partnered research. J Am Med Assoc. 2007;297(4):407–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sandoval JA, Lucero J, Oetzel J, et al. Process and outcome constructs for evaluating community-based participatory research projects: A matrix of existing measures. Health Educ Res. 2011;27(4):680–90.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Seifer SD, Blanchard LW, Jordan C, Gelmon S, McGinley P. Faculty for the engaged campus: Advancing community-engaged careers in the academy. J High Educ Outreach Engagem. 2012;16(1):5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  23. McLaughlin K, Manns B, Mortis G, Hons R, Taub K. Why patients with ESRD do not select self-care dialysis as a treatment option. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;41(2):380–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Grol R, Wensing M. What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Med J Aust. 2004;180(6 Suppl):S57–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wallerstein N, Duran B. Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: The intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(Suppl):S40–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173–202.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glyn Elwyn FRCGP, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grande, S.W., Durand, MA., Fisher, E.S. et al. Physicians as Part of the Solution? Community-Based Participatory Research as a Way to Get Shared Decision Making into Practice. J GEN INTERN MED 29, 219–222 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2602-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2602-2

KEY WORDS

Navigation