Exploring Public Attitudes Towards Approaches to Discussing Costs in the Clinical Encounter
Patients’ willingness to discuss costs of treatment alternatives with their physicians is uncertain.
To explore public attitudes toward doctor–patient discussions of insurer and out-of-pocket costs and to examine whether several possible communication strategies might enhance patient receptivity to discussing costs with their physicians.
Focus group discussions and pre-discussion and post-discussion questionnaires.
Two hundred and eleven insured individuals with mean age of 48 years, 51 % female, 34 % African American, 27 % Latino, and 50 % with incomes below 300 % of the federal poverty threshold, participated in 22 focus groups in Santa Monica, CA and in the Washington, DC metro area.
Attitudes toward discussing out-of-pocket and insurer costs with physicians, and towards physicians’ role in controlling costs; receptivity toward recommended communication strategies regarding costs.
Participants expressed more willingness to talk to doctors about personal costs than insurer costs. Older participants and sicker participants were more willing to talk to the doctor about all costs than younger and healthier participants (OR = 1.8, p = 0.004; OR = 1.6, p = 0.027 respectively). Participants who face cost-related barriers to accessing health care were in greater agreement than others that doctors should play a role in reducing out-of-pocket costs (OR = 2.4, p = 0.011). Participants did not endorse recommended communication strategies for discussing costs in the clinical encounter. In contrast, participants stated that trust in one’s physician would enhance their willingness to discuss costs. Perceived impediments to discussing costs included rushed, impersonal visits, and clinicians who are insufficiently informed about costs.
This study suggests that trusting relationships may be more conducive than any particular discussion strategy to facilitating doctor–patient discussions of health care costs. Better public understanding of how medical decisions affect insurer costs and how such costs ultimately affect patients personally will be necessary if discussions about insurer costs are to occur in the clinical encounter.
- Cassel, CK, Brennan, TE (2007) Managing medical resources: return to the commons?. JAMA 297: pp. 2518-2521 CrossRef
- Lois Snyder, JD (2012) American College of Physicians Ethics Manual Sixth Edition. Ann Intern Med 156: pp. 73-104 CrossRef
- Meropol, NJ, Schrag, D, Smith, TJ, Mulvey, TM, Langdon, RM, Blum, D, Ubel, PA, Schnipper, LE (2009) American Society of Clinical Oncology Guidance Statement: the cost of cancer care. J Clin Oncol 27: pp. 3868-74 CrossRef
- AMA Council on Medical Services. Report of the Council on Medical Service: Strategies to Address Rising Health Care Costs. http://www.ama-assn.org/resources/doc/cms/a07cms8.pdf
- American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation. Choosing Wisely. Available at http://www.abimfoundation.org/Initiatives/Choosing-Wisely.aspx
- AMA Code of Ethics Opinion on Stewardship. Available from http://www.ama-assn.org/resources/doc/ethics/ceja-1a12.pdf
- Physician Charter in 2002. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: A physician charter. Ann Int Med. 2002;136(3):243–6.
- Shapiro, MF, Ware, JE, Sherbourne, CD (1986) Effects of cost sharing on seeking care for serious and minor symptoms: results of a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 104: pp. 246-251 CrossRef
- Wong, MD, Andersen, R, Shelbourne, CD, Hays, RD, Shapiro, MF (2001) Effects of cost sharing on care seeking and health status: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Am J Public Health 91: pp. 1889-1894 CrossRef
- Mojtabai, R, Olfson, M (2003) Medication costs, adherence, and health outcomes among medicare beneficiaries. Health Aff 22: pp. 4220-4229 CrossRef
- Blustein, J (1995) Medicare coverage, supplemental insurance, and the use of mammography by older women. N Engl J Med 332: pp. 1138-1143 CrossRef
- Blendon RJ, Brodie M, Benson JM, Altman DE, Buhr T. Americans’ views of health care costs, access, and quality. Milbank Q. 2006;84(4).
- Donley, G, Danis, M (2011) Making the case for talking to patients about the costs of end-of-life care. J Law Med Ethics 39: pp. 183-93 CrossRef
- Hall, MA, Schneider, CE (2009) Professional obligations when patients pay out of pocket. J Fam Pract 58: pp. E1-E4
- Owen-Smith, A, Coast, J, Donovan, J (2010) Are patients receiving enough information about healthcare rationing? A qualitative study. J Med Ethics. 36: pp. 88-92 CrossRef
- Hurst, S, Danis, M (2007) A framework for rationing by clinical judgment. Kennedy Inst Ethic Journal 17: pp. 247-266 CrossRef
- AMA Code of Ethics. Available from http://www.ama-assn.org/resources/doc/ethics/ceja-1a12.pdf
- Hardee, JT, Platt, FW, Kasper, IK (2005) Discussing health care costs with patients: an opportunity for empathic communication. J Gen Intern Med 20: pp. 666-669 CrossRef
- Platt, FW, Keller, VF (1994) Empathic communication: a teachable and learnable skill. J Gen Intern Med 9: pp. 222-226 CrossRef
- Suchman, AL, Markakis, K, Beckman, HB, Frankel, R (1997) A model of empathic communication in the medical interview. JAMA 277: pp. 678-682 CrossRef
- Halpern, J (2003) What is clinical empathy?. J Gen Intern Med 18: pp. 670-674 CrossRef
- Pearson, S (2000) Caring and cost: the challenge for physician advocacy. Ann Intern Med 133: pp. 148-153 CrossRef
- Nelson, AL, Cohen, JT, Greenberg, D, Kent, DM (2009) Much cheaper, almost as good: decrementally cost-effective medical innovation. Ann Intern Med 151: pp. 662-7 CrossRef
- Collins SR, Kriss JL, Doty MM, and Rustgi SD. Losing Ground: How the Loss of Adequate Health Insurance Is Burdening Working Families: Findings from The Commonwealth Fund Biennial Health Insurance Surveys, 2001–2007. 2008. Available at: http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Publications/Fund-Reports/2008/Aug/Losing-Ground--How-the-Loss-of-Adequate-Health-Insurance-Is-Burdening-Working-Families--8212-Finding.aspx
- Alexander, GC, Casalino, LP, Tseng, CW, McFadden, D, Meltzer, DO (2004) Barriers to patient–physician communication about out-of-pocket costs. J Gen Intern Med 19: pp. 856-60 CrossRef
- Sommers, R, Goold, SD, McGlynn, EA, Pearson, SD, Danis, M (2013) Focus groups highlight that many patients object to clinicians’ focusing on costs. Health Aff 32: pp. 338-346 CrossRef
- Kullgren, JT, McLaughlin, CG, Mitra, N, Armstrong, K (2012) Nonfinancial barriers and access to care for U.S. adults. Health Serv Res 47: pp. 462-85 CrossRef
- Owen-Smith, A, Coast, J, Donovan, J (2009) “I can see where they’re coming from, but when you’re on the end of it…you just want to get the money and the drug:” explaining reactions to explicit healthcare rationing. Soc Sci Med 68: pp. 1935-1942 CrossRef
- Owen-Smith, A, Coast, J, Donovan, J (2009) The desirability of being open about health care rationing decisions: findings from a qualitative study of patients and clinical professionals. J Health Serv Res Pol 15: pp. 14-20 CrossRef
- Blendon RJ, Benson JM, Botta MD, Zeldow D, Kim MK. A four-country survey of public attitudes towards restricting healthcare costs by limiting the use of high-cost medical interventions. BMJ Open. 2012;2(3).
- Coast, J (2001) Who wants to know if their care is rationed? Views of citizens and service informants. Health Expect 4: pp. 243-52 CrossRef
- Exploring Public Attitudes Towards Approaches to Discussing Costs in the Clinical Encounter
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 29, Issue 1 , pp 223-229
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- decision making
- health care costs
- patient engagement
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Building 10, Rm. 1C118, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1156, USA
- 2. RAND, Santa Monica, CA, USA
- 3. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- 4. Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA, USA