Mammography Use Among Women Ages 40–49 After the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In 2009, the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force changed its recommendation regarding screening mammography in average-risk women aged 40–49 years.
To evaluate the effects of the 2009 recommendation on reported mammogram use in a population-based survey.
Secondary data analysis of data collected in the 2006, 2008, and 2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys.
Women ages 40–74 years in the 50 states and Washington, DC who were not pregnant at time of survey and reported data on mammogram use during the 2006, 2008, or 2010 survey.
Mammogram use was compared between women ages 40–49 and women ages 50–74 before and after the recommendation. We performed a difference-in-difference estimation adjusted for access to care, education, race, and health status, and stratified analyses by whether women reported having a routine checkup in the prior year.
Reported prevalence of mammogram use in the past year among women ages 40–49 and 50–74 was 53.2 % and 65.2 %, respectively in 2008, and 51.7 % and 62.4 % in 2010. In 2010, mammography use did not significantly decline from 2006–2008 in women ages 40–49 relative to women ages 50–74.
There was no reduction in mammography use among younger women in 2010 compared to older women and previous years. Patients and providers may have been hesitant to comply with the 2009 recommendation.
- Task force. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 151: pp. 716-726 CrossRef
- Nelson, HD, Tyne, K, Naik, A (2009) Screening for breast cancer: Systematic evidence review update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Evidence review update. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville
- Nelson, HD, Tyne, K, Naik, A (2009) Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med 151: pp. 727-37 CrossRef
- Kalager, M, Adami, HO, Bretthauer, M, Tamimi, RM (2012) Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer due to mammography screening: results from the Norwegian screening program. Ann Int Med 156: pp. 491-9 CrossRef
- Partridge, AH, Winer, EP (2009) On mammography—more agreement than disagreement. N Engl J Med 361: pp. 2499-501 CrossRef
- DeAngelis, CD, Fontanarosa, PB (2010) U.S. preventive services task force and breast cancer screening. JAMA 303: pp. 173-4 CrossRef
- Squiers, LB, Holden, DJ, Dolina, SE (2010) The public’s response to the U.S. preventive services task force’s 2009 recommendations on mammography screening. Am J Prev Med 40: pp. 497-504 CrossRef
- Davidson, AS, Liao, X, Magee, D (2011) Attitudes of women in their forties toward the 2009 USPSTF mammogram guidelines: a randomized trial on the effects of media exposure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205: pp. e1-7 CrossRef
- American Cancer Society. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. www.cancer.org/Healthy/FindCancerEarly/CancerScreeningGuidelines/american-cancer-society-guidelines-for-the-early-detection-of-cancer. Accessed April 21, 2013.
- Hinz, EK, Kudesia, R, Rolston, R (2011) Physician knowledge of and adherence to the revised breast cancer screening guidelines by the U.S. preventive services. Task Force. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205: pp. 201 CrossRef
- Miller, JW, King, JB, Ryerson, AB (2009) Mammography use from 2000–6: state-level trends with corresponding breast cancer incidence rates. Am J Roentology. 192: pp. 352-60 CrossRef
- Ryerson, AB, Miller, JQ, Eheman, CR (2008) Recent trends in U.S. mammography use from 2000–6: a population-based analysis. Prev Med. 47: pp. 477-82 CrossRef
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Cancer Screening- United States, 2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports. 2012. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6103a1.htm. Accessed May 1, 2013.
- Meissner, HI, Klabunde, CN, Han, PK (2011) Breast cancer screening beliefs, recommendations, and practices. Cancer 117: pp. 3101-11 CrossRef
- Bellizzi, KM, Breslau, ES, Burness, A (2011) Prevalence of cancer screening in older and racially diverse adults. Arch Intern Med 171: pp. 2031-37 CrossRef
- Pace LE, He Y, Keating NL. Trends in mammography screening rates after publication of the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations. Cancer. 2013. doi:10.1002/cncr.28105.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Questionnaire. Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006, 2008, and 2010.
- Nelson, DE, Holtzman, D, Bolen, J, Stanwyck, CA, Mack, KA (2001) Reliability and validity of measures from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Soc Prev Med. 46: pp. S03-S42 CrossRef
- Caplan, LS, McQueen, DV, Qualters, JR, Leff, M, Garrett, C, Calonge, N (2003) Validity of women’s self-reports of cancer screening test utilization in a managed care population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 12: pp. 1182
- Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey. 2011 survey data information: Comparability of data. CDC. 2011. http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/annual_2011.htm. Accessed April 21, 2013.
- Lambrew, JM, Defriese, GH, Carey, TS, Ricketts, TC, Biddle, AK (1996) The effects of having a regular doctor on access to primary care. Med Care 34: pp. 138-51 CrossRef
- Shoen, C, DesRoches, C (2000) Uninsured and unstably insured: the importance of continuous insurance coverage. Health Serv Res 35: pp. 187-203
- Bertrand, M, Duflo, E, Mullainathan, S (2004) How much should we trust difference-in-differences estimates?. Q J Econ 119: pp. 249-75 CrossRef
- Norton, EC, Wang, H, Ai, C (2004) Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models. Stata J 4: pp. 154-67
- Volpp, KG, Rosen, AK, Rosenbaum, PR (2007) Mortality among medicare beneficiaries in the first two years following ACGME resident duty hour reform. JAMA 298: pp. 975-83 CrossRef
- Karaca-Mandic, P, Norton, EC, Dowd, B (2012) Interaction terms in nonlinear models. Health Serv Res 47: pp. 255-274 CrossRef
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). BRFSS Weighting Formula. Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2010/2010_weighting.htm. Accessed April 21, 2013.
- Nutting, PA, Baier, M, Werner, JJ, Cutter, G, Conry, C, Stewart, L (2001) Competing demands in the office visit: what influences mammography recommendations. J Am Board Fam Pract. 14: pp. 352-61
- Lu, P, Bridges, CB, Euler, GL, Singleton, JA (2008) Influenza vaccination of recommended adult populations, United States, 1989–2005. Vaccine 26: pp. 1786-93 CrossRef
- Smith, RA, Cokkinides, V, Brookes, D, Saslow, D, Brawley, OW (2010) Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: a review of current American cancer society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin 60: pp. 99-119 CrossRef
- Meissner, HI, Breen, N, Klabunde, CN, Vernon, SW (2006) Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 15: pp. 389-94 CrossRef
- Zelaidt, SB, Hoffman, RM, Etzioni, R (2011) Influence of publication of US and European prostate cancer screening trials on PSA testing practices. J Natl Cancer Inst. 103: pp. 520-3 CrossRef
- Feldman, S (2011) Making sense of the new cervical cancer screening guidelines. N Engl J Med 365: pp. 2145-47 CrossRef
- Solomon, D, Breen, N, McNeel, T (2007) Cervical cancer screening rates in the United States and the potential impact of implementation of screening guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin 57: pp. 105-11 CrossRef
- Rauscher, GH, Johnson, TP, Cho, YI (2008) Accuracy of self-reported cancer-screening histories: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 17: pp. 748-57 CrossRef
- Craig, BM, Quinn, GP, Vadaparampil, ST (2009) Sensitivity of self-report mammography use in older women. Am J Prev Med 37: pp. 441-4 CrossRef
- Elmore, JG, Barton, MB, Moceri, VM, Polk, S, Arena, PJ, Fletcher, SW (1998) Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J Med 338: pp. 1089-96 CrossRef
- Mammography Use Among Women Ages 40–49 After the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 28, Issue 11 , pp 1447-1453
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- cancer screening
- women’s health
- preventive health
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 2024 E. Monument St, Room 2-604, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
- 2. Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA