Date: 21 Nov 2012
Comparison of Healthcare Experiences in Autistic and Non-Autistic Adults: A Cross-Sectional Online Survey Facilitated by an Academic-Community Partnership
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Little is known about the healthcare experiences of adults on the autism spectrum. Moreover, autistic adults have rarely been included as partners in autism research.
To compare the healthcare experiences of autistic and non-autistic adults via an online survey.
We used a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach to adapt survey instruments to be accessible to autistic adults and to conduct an online cross-sectional survey. We assessed preliminary psychometric data on the adapted scales. We used multivariate analyses to compare healthcare experiences of autistic and non-autistic participants.
Four hundred and thirty-seven participants completed the survey (209 autistic, 228 non-autistic). All adapted scales had good to excellent internal consistency reliability (alpha 0.82–0.92) and strong construct validity. In multivariate analyses, after adjustment for demographic characteristics, health insurance, and overall health status, autistic adults reported lower satisfaction with patient-provider communication (beta coefficient −1.9, CI −2.9 to −0.9), general healthcare self-efficacy (beta coefficient −11.9, CI −14.0 to −8.6), and chronic condition self-efficacy (beta coefficient −4.5, CI −7.5 to −1.6); higher odds of unmet healthcare needs related to physical health (OR 1.9 CI 1.1–3.4), mental health (OR 2.2, CI 1.3–3.7), and prescription medications (OR 2.8, CI 2.2–7.5); lower self-reported rates of tetanus vaccination (OR 0.5, CI 0.3–0.9) and Papanicolaou smears (OR 0.5, CI 0.2–0.9); and greater odds of using the emergency department (OR 2.1, CI 1.8–3.8).
A CBPR approach may facilitate the inclusion of people with disabilities in research by increasing researchers’ ability to create accessible data collection instruments. Autistic adults who use the Internet report experiencing significant healthcare disparities. Efforts are needed to improve the healthcare of autistic individuals, including individuals who may be potentially perceived as having fewer disability-related needs.
Office of Autism Research Coordination, National Institute of Mental Health, on behalf of the Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee. 2010 IACC Autism Spectrum Disorder research portfolio analysis report. Washington, DC July 2012.
Sinclair J. Why I dislike “person first” language. http://web.archive.org/web/20080616063934/http://web.syr.edu/∼jisincla/person_first.htm. Accessed October 10, 2012.
Durvasula SBH. Health inequalities in people with intellectual disability: strategies for improvement. Health Promot J Aust. 2001;11:27–31.
Janicki MP, Dalton AJ, Henderson CM, Davidson PW. Mortality and morbidity among older adults with intellectual disability: health services considerations. Disabil Rehabil. 1999;5(6):284–94.
Lishner DM, PhD MR, Levine P, Patrick D. Access to primary health care among persons with disabilities in rural areas: a summary of the literature. J Rural Heal. 1996;12(1):45–53.CrossRef
Sullivan WF, Heng J, Cameron D, et al. Consensus guidelines for primary health care of adults with developmental disabilities. Canadian Family Physician. 2006;52(11):1410.PubMed
Lewis MA, Lewis CE, Leake B, King BH. The quality of health care for adults with developmental disabilities. Public Health Rep (1974-). 2002;174–84.
Coughlin TA, Long SK, Kendall S. Health care access, use, and satisfaction among disabled Medicaid beneficiaries. Health Care Financing Rev. 2002;24(2):115–36.
Wan TTH, Arling G. Differential use of health services among disabled elderly. Res Aging. 1983;5(3):411.CrossRef
Reynolds F, Stanistreet D, Elton P. Women with learning disabilities and access to cervical screening: retrospective cohort study using case control methods. BMC Publ Health. 2008;8(1):30.CrossRef
Burns TJ, Batavia AI, Smith QW, DeJong G. Primary health care needs of persons with physical disabilities: what are the research and service priorities? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990;71(2):138–43.PubMed
Chau N. More than ramps. a guide to improving healthcare quality and access for people with disabilities. Br Med J. 2007;61(4):367–367.
Rimmer JH, Braddock D. Health promotion for people with physical, cognitive, and sensory disabilities: an emerging national priority. Am J Heal Promot. 2002;16(4):220–4.CrossRef
Becker H, Stuifbergen A, Tinkle M. Reproductive health care experiences of women with physical disabilities: a qualitative study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(12S5):26–33.CrossRef
Robertson S. Information technology & the autistic culture: Influences, empowerment, & progression of IT usage in advocacy initiatives. Paper presented at: Autreat; June, 2007, 2007; Pennsylvania, PA.
Biever C. Web removes social barriers for those with autism. New Scientist. 2007;2610:26–7.
Murray D, Aspinall A, Getting IT. Using information technology to empower people with communication difficulties. London: Jessica Kingsely Publishers; 2006.
Blume, H. Autistics are communicating in cyberspace. http://www.nytimes.com/library/cyber/techcol/063097techcol.html. Accessed October 10, 2012.
Viswanathan M, Ammerman A, Eng E, et al. Community-based participatory research: Assessing the evidence. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality July 2004. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 99.
Nicolaidis C, Raymaker D, McDonald K, et al. Collaboration strategies in non-traditional CBPR partnerships: lessons from an academic-community partnership with autistic self-advocates. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action. In press.
Bureau USC. Disability Status: 2000 Census Brief 2003.
Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Skinner R, Martin J, Clubley E. The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians.[erratum appears in J Autism Dev Disord 2001 Dec;31(6):603]. J Autism Dev Disord. 2001;31(1):5–17.PubMedCrossRef
Cantor D, Covell, J., Davis, T., Park, I., & Rizzo, L. Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). http://hints.cancer.gov/docs/HINTS2007FinalReport.pdf. Accessed October 10, 2012.
Hong T. Internet health information in the patient-provider dialogue. CyberPsychology Behav. 2008;5:587–9.CrossRef
Marks R, Ok H, Joung H, Allegrante JP. Perceptions about collaborative decisions: perceived provider effectiveness among 2003 and 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) respondents. J Heal Commun. 2010;15(Suppl 3):135–46.CrossRef
Smith SG, Wolf MS, von Wagner C. Socioeconomic status, statistical confidence, and patient-provider communication: an analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 2007). J Heal Commun.15 Suppl 3:169–85.
Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Ritter PL, Laurent D, Hobbs M. Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease. Eff Clin Pract. 2001;4(6):256–62.PubMed
Lorig K, Stewart A, Ritter P, Gonzalez V, Laurent D, Lynch J. Outcome measures for health education and other health care interventions. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1996.
Blackwell, D., Gentleman, J., Martin, M., Ng, E.,Sanmartin, C., Simile, C. Joint Canada/United States Survey of Health: Findings and Public-use Microdata File. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/82m0022x/2003001/pdf/4228656-eng.pdf. Accessed 02/25/2009.
Sanmartin C, Berthelot J-M, Ng E, et al. Comparing health and health care use in Canada and the United States. Health Aff. 2006;25(4):1133–42.CrossRef
Pleis JR, Lucas JW. Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2007. Vital Health Stat—Series 10: Data From the National Health Survey. 2009;240:1–159.
CDC. National Health Interview Survey (NHIS)—Adult access to health care & utilization. http://www.ihis.us/ihis/resources/surveys_pdf/survey_form_ih2007_fam.pdf. Accessed October 10, 2012.
Ware JE, GlaxoSmithKline. How to score and interpret single-item health status measures: a manual for users of the of the SF-8 health survey:(with a supplement on the SF-6 health survey): QualityMetric, Inc.; 2001.
Emerson E, Graham H, Hatton C. The measurement of poverty and socioeconomic position in research involving people with intellectual disability. Int Rev Res Ment Retard. 2006;32:77–108.CrossRef
Aman MGHB. Reactions to “ethical challenges and complexities of including people with intellectual disability as participants in research” by dr teresa lacono. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2006;31(3):180–2.CrossRef
Ham M, Jones N, Mansell I, Northway R, Price L, Walker G. ‘I’m a researcher!’ working together to gain ethical approval for a participatory research study. J Learn Disabil. 2004;8(4):397–407.
McVilly K, Dalton AJ. Commentary on lacono (2006): “ethical challenges and complexities of including people with intellectual disability as participants in research”. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2006;31(3):186–8.CrossRef
Carter-Pokras O, Baquet C. What is a“ health disparity”? Public Health Rep. 2002;117(5):426.PubMed
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Secretary’s Advisory Committee on National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives for 2020. About Health People: Disparities. http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/about/disparitiesAbout.aspx. Accessed July 10, 2012.
Bruder MB, Kerins G, Mazzarella C, Sims J, Stein N. Brief report: the medical care of adults with autism spectrum disorders: identifying the needs. J Autism Dev Disord. 2012;42(11):2498–504.
Sax LJ, Gilmartin SK, Bryant AN. Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Res High Educ. 2003;44(4):409–32.CrossRef
Rhodes SD, Bowie DA, Hergenrather KC. Collecting behavioural data using the world wide web: considerations for researchers. J Epidemiol Community. 2003;57(1):68–73.CrossRef
American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5 proposed criteria for autism spectrum disorder designed to provide more accurate diagnosis and treatment. January 20, 2012. http://www.dsm5.org/Documents/12-03%20Autism%20Spectrum%20Disorders%20-%20DSM5.pdf. Accessed July 10, 2012.
American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5 Development: A 05 Autism Spectrum Disorder—Rationale. http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevision/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=94#. Accessed July 10, 2012.
Mattila M-L, Kielinen M, Linna S-L, et al. Autism spectrum disorders according to DSM-IV-TR and comparison with DSM-5 draft criteria: an epidemiological study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatr. 2011;50(6):583–92.e511.CrossRef
McPartland JC, Reichow B, Volkmar FR. Sensitivity and specificity of proposed DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for autism spectrum disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatr. 2012;51(4):368–83.CrossRef
- Comparison of Healthcare Experiences in Autistic and Non-Autistic Adults: A Cross-Sectional Online Survey Facilitated by an Academic-Community Partnership
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 28, Issue 6 , pp 761-769
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- community-based participatory research
- healthcare disparities
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Departments of Medicine and Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, L475; 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
- 2. Autistic Self Advocacy Network, Washington, DC, USA
- 3. Department of Public Health, Food Studies & Nutrition and the Burton Blatt Institute, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA
- 4. AASPIRE Community Partner at Large, Portland, USA