Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cultural, Economic, and Psychological Predictors of Colonoscopy in a National Sample

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death among adults in the US and colonoscopy is efficacious in reducing morbidity and mortality from CRC, screening rates are sub-optimal. Understanding the socioeconomic, cultural, and health care context within which decisions about colonoscopy are made allows physicians to address patients’ most salient beliefs and values and other constraints when making screening recommendations.

Objective

To evaluate the direct and interactive effects of socioeconomics, health care variables, psychological characteristics, and cultural values on colonoscopy use.

Design, Setting, Participants

National survey completed between January-August 2009 in a random sample of African American, white, and Hispanic adults ages 50–75 without cancer (n = 582).

Main Measure

Self-reported colonoscopy use.

Key Results

Only 59% of respondents reported having a colonoscopy. The likelihood of colonoscopy increased with having health insurance (OR = 2.82, 95% CI = 1.24, 6.43, p = 0.004), and increasing age (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.11, 1.77, p = 0.001). In addition, respondents with greater self-efficacy were more likely to have a colonoscopy (OR = 2.41, 95% CI = 1.35, 4.29, p = 0.003).

Conclusions

Programs that help patients to overcome access and psychological barriers to screening are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Prevention and Early Detection Facts and Figures 2010. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:130–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC, et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:739–750.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Liles E, Beil TL, Fu R. Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:638–658.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:132–141.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Walsh JM, Terdiman JP. Colorectal cancer screening: scientific review. JAMA. 2003;289:1288–1296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 50–75 years - United States, 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59:808–812.

  8. Kelly KM, Dickinson SL, Degraffinreid CR, Tatum CM, Paskett ED. Colorectal cancer screening in 3 racial groups. Am J Health Behav. 2007;31:502–513.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wong N. Investigating the effects of cancer risk and efficacy perceptions on cancer prevention adherence and intentions. Health Commun. 2009;24:95–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kreuter MW, Lukwago SN, Bucholtz RD, Clark EM, Sanders-Thompson V. Achieving cultural appropriateness in health promotion programs: targeted and tailored approaches. Health Educ Behav. 2003;30:133–146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lannin DR, Mathews HF, Mitchell J, et al. Influence of socioeconomic and cultural factors on racial differences in late-stage presentation of breast cancer. JAMA. 1998;279:1801–1807.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kinney AY, Bloor LE, Martin C, Sandler RS. Social ties and colorectal cancer screening among Blacks and Whites in North Carolina. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:182–189.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kagawa-Singer M, Dadia AV, Yu MC, Surbone A. Cancer, culture, and health disparities: time to chart a new course? CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:12–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1977–1981.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF, et al. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:1–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Klabunde CN, Lanier D, Nadel MR, et al. Colorectal cancer screening by primary care physicians: recommendations and practices, 2006–2007. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37:8–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Guerra CE, Schwartz JS, Armstrong K, et al. Barriers of and facilitators to physician recommendation of colorectal cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1681–1688.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schenck AP, Peacock SC, Klabunde CN, et al. Trends in colorectal cancer test use in the medicare population, 1998–2005. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the United States, 2009: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:27–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. The American Association for Public Opinion Research. 2011. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. 7th edition. AAPOR.

  21. National Cancer Institute. Health Information National Trends Survey. Available at http://hints.cancer.gov/questions/index.jsp. (Accessed June 16, 2011).

  22. Baier M, Calonge N, Cutter G, et al. Validity of self-reported colorectal cancer screening behavior. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000;9:229–232.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Aiken L, West S. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data. Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008.

  25. White A, Vernon SW, Franzini L, Du, XL. Racial and ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer screening persisted despite expansion of Medicare’s screening reimbursement. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:811–817.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Crawford ND, Jones CP, Richardson LC. Understanding racial and ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer screening: behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 2002 and 2004. Ethn Dis. 2010;20:359–365.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rim SH, Joseph DA, Steele CB. Colorectal cancer screening—United States, 2002, 2004, 2006, and 2008. MMWR. 2011;60:42–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Colorectal Cancer Control Program. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/crccp/. (Accessed June 16, 2011).

  29. McQueen A, Vernon SW, Rothman AJ, et al. Examining the role of perceived susceptibility on colorectal cancer screening intention and behavior. Ann Behav Med. 2010;40:205–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pargament KI, Koenig HG, Perez LM. The many methods of religious coping: development and initial validation of the RCOPE. J Clin Psychol. 2000;56:519–543.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Holden DJ, Jonas DE, Porterfield DS, Reuland D, Harris R. Systematic review: enhancing the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 152:668–676.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Christie J, Itzkowitz S, Lihau-Nkanza I, et al. A randomized controlled trial using patient navigation to increase colonoscopy screening among low-income minorities. J Natl Med Assoc. 2008;100;278–284.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lasser KE, Murillo J, Lisboa S, et al. Colorectal cancer screening among ethnically diverse, low-income patients. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:906–912.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Contributors

We would like to acknowledge Abt/SBRI for completing telephone interviews. We are very appreciative to the men and women who participated in this research.

Funders

This research was supported by National Cancer Institute grant #R01-CA100254.

Prior Presentations

None.

Conflict of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chanita Hughes Halbert PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Halbert, C.H., Barg, F.K., Guerra, C.E. et al. Cultural, Economic, and Psychological Predictors of Colonoscopy in a National Sample. J GEN INTERN MED 26, 1311–1316 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1783-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1783-9

KEY WORDS

Navigation