Abstract
Background
While almost half of women use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) during their menopause, almost no literature explores why women choose CAM for menopausal symptoms. Clinician–patient conversations about CAM can be unsatisfactory, and exploration of women’s choices may benefit communication.
Objective
The objective of this study was to describe women’s choices to use CAM for menopausal health issues.
Design
This is a qualitative study utilizing semi-structured interviews.
Participants
Convenience sample of 44 menopausal women ages 45 to 60 recruited in two primary care clinics. Both users and non-users of CAM were included.
Approach
Transcripts of semi-structured interviews were analyzed for themes that were refined through comparison of labeled text.
Main results
Four themes emerged in decisions to use CAM: (1) valuing CAM as “natural”, although the meaning of “natural” varied greatly, (2) perceiving menopause as marking a change in life stage, (3) seeking information about menopause generated from personal intuition and other women’s experiences, and (4) describing experiences before menopause of using CAM and allopathic medication in patterns similar to current use (patterned responses).
Conclusion
Women’s decisions about using CAM during menopause can be understood through their perspectives on menopause and overall health. Increased clinician awareness of these themes may promote supportive discussions about CAM during counseling for menopause.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Upchurch DM, Chyu L. Use of complementary and alternative medicine among American women. Womens Health Issues. 2005;15(1)5–13.
Bair YA, Gold EB, Greendale GA, et al. Ethnic differences in use of complementary and alternative medicine at midlife: longitudinal results from SWAN participants. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(11):1832–40.
Newton KM, Buist DS, Keenan NL, Anderson LA, LaCroix AZ. Use of alternative therapies for menopause symptoms: results of a population-based survey(1). Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100(1):18–25.
Seidl MM, Stewart DE. Alternative treatments for menopausal symptoms. Qualitative study of women’s experiences. Can Fam Physician. 1998;44:1271–6.
Astin JA. Why patients use alternative medicine: results of a national study. JAMA. 1998;279(19):1548–53.
Singh H, Maskarinec G, Shumay DM. Understanding the motivation for conventional and complementary/alternative medicine use among men with prostate cancer. Integr Cancer Ther. 2005;4(2):187–94.
Boon H, Brown JB, Gavin A, Westlake K. Men with prostate cancer: making decisions about complementary/alternative medicine. Med Decis Making. 2003;23(6):471–9.
Adler S, Fosket JR. Disclosing complementary and alternative medicine use in the medical encounter: a qualitative study in women with breast cancer. J Fam Pract. 1999;48(6):453–8.
Eisenberg DM, Kessler RC, Van Rompay MI, et al. Perceptions about complementary therapies relative to conventional therapies among adults who use both: results from a national survey. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135(5):344–51.
Elder NC, Gillcrist A, Minz R. Use of alternative health care by family practice patients. Arch Fam Med. 1997;6(2):181–4.
Kam IW, Dennehy CE, Tsourounis C. Dietary supplement use among menopausal women attending a San Francisco health conference. Menopause. 2002;9(1):72–8.
Corbin Winslow L, Shapiro H. Physicians want education about complementary and alternative medicine to enhance communication with their patients. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(10):1176–81.
Tasaki K, Maskarinec G, Shumay DM, Tatsumura Y, Kakai H. Communication between physicians and cancer patients about complementary and alternative medicine: exploring patients’ perspectives. Psychooncology. 2002;11(3):212–220.
Gray RE, Fitch M, Greenberg M. A comparison of physician and patient perspectives on unconventional cancer therapies. Psychooncology. 1998;7(6):445–52.
Benner P. The tradition and skill of interpretative phenomenology in studying health, illness, and caring practice. In: Benner P, ed. Interpretive Phenomenology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994:99–127.
Van Manen M. Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London, Ontario, Canada: State University of New York Press; 1990.
Miles M, Huberman A. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994.
Denzin N, Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2000.
Adler SR, Fosket RJ, Kagawa-Singer M, et al. Conceptualizing menopause and midlife: Chinese American and Chinese women in the US. Maturitas. 2000;35(1):11–23.
George SA. The menopause experience: a woman’s perspective. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2002;31(1):77–85.
Adler SR. Complementary and alternative medicine use among women with breast cancer. Med Anthropol Q. 1999;13(2):214–22.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Gay Becker PhD and Lisa Bourgeault MA, who contributed to the analysis of this data. Incidental expenses were covered by the University of California, San Francisco Department of Family and Community Medicine.
Conflicts of interest statement
None disclosed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the linked to the Electronic supplementary material.
11606_2008_537_MOESM1_ESM.doc
Sample quotes illustrating themes associated with using complementary and alternative medicine for symptoms related to menopause. Italics have been used to note explanatory comments and questions by the researchers. Bold face has been used to clarify important sentences in a long quote (DOC 36 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hill-Sakurai, L.E., Muller, J. & Thom, D.H. Complementary and Alternative Medicine for Menopause: A Qualitative Analysis of Women’s Decision Making. J GEN INTERN MED 23, 619–622 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0537-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0537-9