Know When to Rock the Boat: How Faculty Rationalize Students’ Behaviors
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
When faculty evaluate medical students’ professionalism, they make judgments based on the observation of behaviors. However, we lack an understanding of why they feel certain behaviors are appropriate (or not).
To explore faculty’s reasoning around potential student behaviors in professionally challenging situations.
Guided interviews with faculty who were asked to respond to 5 videotaped scenarios depicting students in professionally challenging situations.
Purposive sample of 30 attending Internists and surgeons.
Transcripts were analyzed using modified grounded theory to search for emerging themes and to attempt to validate a previous framework based on student responses.
Faculty’s reasoning around behaviors were similar to students’ and were categorized by three general themes: Imperatives (e.g., take care of patients, behave honestly, know your place), Affect (factors relating to a student’s “gut instincts” or personality), or Implications (for the student, patients, and others). Several new themes emerged, including “know when to fudge the truth”, “do what you’re told”, and “know when to step up to the plate”. These new codes, along with a near ubiquitous reference to Affect, suggests that faculty feel students are responsible for knowing when (and how) to bend the rules. Potential reasons for this are discussed.
Although faculty are aware of the conflicts students face when encountering professional challenges, their reliance on students to “just know” what to do reflects the underlying complexity and ambiguity that surrounds decision making in these situations. To fully understand professional decision-making, we must acknowledge and address these issues from both students’ and faculty’s points of view.
- Arnold L. Assessing professional behaviour: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Acad Med. 2002;77(6):502–15. CrossRef
- Stern DT, ed. Measuring Medical Professionalism, 1st Edn. New York, NY: Oxford University Press: 2006.
- Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Hatala R, et al. Context, conflict, and resolution: a new conceptual framework for evaluating professionalism. Acad Med. 2000;10;75(10 Suppl):S6–11.
- Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Lingard L. Basing the evaluation of professionalism on observable behaviours: a cautionary tale. Acad Med. 2004;79(10 Suppl):S1–4. CrossRef
- Rees CE, Knight LV. Viewpoint: the trouble with assessing students’ professionalism: theoretical insights from sociocognitive psychology. Acad Med. 2007;82(1):46–50. CrossRef
- Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Lingard L. The disavowed curriculum: understanding students’ reasoning in professionally challenging situations. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(12):1015–22. CrossRef
- Creswell JW. Data collection. In: Creswell JW, ed. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998:109–35.
- Glaser BG. Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press: 1992.
- Kennedy TJ, Lingard L. Making sense of grounded theory in medical education. Med Educ. 2006;40(2):101–8. CrossRef
- NVivo qualitative data analysis program. Version 2.0. QSR International Pty Ltd.; 2002.
- Burack JH, Irby DM, Carline JD, Root RK, Larson EB. Teaching compassion and respect: attending physicians’ responses to problematic behaviours. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14(1):49–55. CrossRef
- Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Stern DT, Lingard L. The anatomy of the professional lapse: bridging the gap between traditional frameworks and students’ perceptions. Acad Med. 2002;77(6):516–22. CrossRef
- Wallace DS, Paulson RM, Lord CG, Bond CF. Which behaviours do attitudes predict? Meta-analyzing the effects of social pressure and perceived difficulty. Rev Gen Psychol. 2005;9(3):214–27. CrossRef
- Lavine E, Regehr G, Garwood K, Ginsburg S. The role of attribution to clerk factors and contextual factors in supervisors’ perceptions of clerks’ behaviours. Teach Learn Med. 2004;16(4):403–8. CrossRef
- Hafferty FW, Franks R. The hidden curriculum, ethics teaching, and the structure of medical education. Acad Med. 1994;69(11):861–71. CrossRef
- Stern DT. Practicing what we preach? an analysis of the curriculum of values in medical education. Am J Med. 1998;104(6):569–75. CrossRef
- Fryer-Edwards K, Wilkins MD, Baernstein A, Braddock CH. Bringing ethics education to the clinical years: ward ethics sessions at the University of Washington. Acad Med. 2006;81(7):626–31. CrossRef
- Baernstein A, Fryer-Edwards K. Promoting reflection on professionalism: a comparison trial of educational interventions for medical students. Acad Med. 2003;78(7):742–7. CrossRef
- Know When to Rock the Boat: How Faculty Rationalize Students’ Behaviors
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 23, Issue 7 , pp 942-947
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- medical education
- undergraduate education
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- 4. Wilson Centre for Research in Education, University Health Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- 6. Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- 2. Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- 3. Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- 5. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Faculty of Community Services, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada