Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Esophageal Cancer Treatment Is Underutilized Among Elderly Patients in the USA

  • 2016 SSAT Plenary Presentation
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Objectives

Large numbers of elderly patients in the USA receive no treatment for esophageal cancer, despite evidence that multimodality treatment can increase survival. Our goal is to identify factors that may contribute to lack of treatment.

Materials and Methods

Using Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare Linked Database (2001−2009), we identified regional esophageal cancer patients ≥65 years old. Treatment was defined as receiving any medical or surgical therapy for esophageal cancer. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with failure to receive treatment. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model.

Results

There were 5072 patients (median age, 75 years; interquartile range (IQR), 71–81 years). Majority were treated with definitive chemoradiation (48.49 %). Factors associated with lack of treatment included West geographic region and ≥80 years old. Patients who received therapy had better OS (log-rank, p < 0.001). Compared with treated patients, non-treated patients had worse adjusted OS (HR, 1.43; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.33–1.55; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who received treatment had improved 5-year survival compared with patients without treatment. Disparities in utilization of treatment are associated with regional and socioeconomic factors, not presence of comorbidities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnold M, Soerjomataram I, Ferlay J, Forman D. Global incidence of oesophageal cancer by histological subtype in 2012. Gut 2015;64(3):381-387.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. National Cancer Institute. [2013]. SEER Stat Fact Sheets: Esophageal Cancer, [online]. Available: http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/esoph.html [2016, January 23].

  3. van Heijl M, van Lanschot JJ, Koppert LB, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Muller K, Steyerberg EW, van Dekken H, Wijnhoven BPL, Tilanus HW, Richel DJ, Busch ORC, Bartelsman JF, Koning CCE, Offerhaus GJ, van der Gaast A. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery versus surgery alone for patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (CROSS). BMC Surg 2008;8:21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Koeter M, van Steenbergen LN, Lemmens VE, Rutten HJ, Roukemja JA, Wijnhoven BP, Nieuwenhuijzen GA. Hospital of diagnosis and probability to receive a curative treatment for oesophageal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014;40:1338-1345.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Revels SL, Morris AM, Reddy RM, Akateh C, Wong SL. Racial disparities in esophageal cancer outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20:1136-1141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bus P, Aarts MJ, Lemmens VE, van Oijen MG, Creemers GJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, van Baal JW, Siersema PD. The effect of socioeconomic status on staging and treatment decisions in esophageal cancer. J Clin Gastroenterol 2012;46:833-839.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Taioli E, Wolf AS, Camacho-Rivera M, Kaufman A, Lee DS, Bhora F, Flores RM. Racial disparities in esophageal cancer survival after surgery. J Surg Oncol 2016;113:659-664.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Markar SR, Low DE. Physiology, not chronology, dictates outcomes after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: outcomes in patients 80 years and older. Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20:1020-1026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pultrum BB, Bosch DJ, Nijsten MW, Rodgers MG, Groen H, Slaets JP, Plukker JT. Extended esophagectomy in elderly patients with esophageal cancer: minor effect of age alone in determining the postoperative course and survival. Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17:1572-1580.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Sylvie L, Silvia S, Salah-Eddin AB, Markus F, Florian L, Peter TP, Bernhard H, Martin A, Alexander N. Impact of age on the feasibility and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced oesophagogastric cancer. Eur J Cancer 2015;51:1918-1926.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lorenzen S, Pauligk C, Homann N, Schmalenberg H, Jäger E, Al-Batran SE. Feasibility of perioperative chemotherapy with infusional 5-FU, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with (FLOT) or without (FLO) docetaxel in elderly patients with locally advanced esophagogastric cancer. Br J Cancer 2013;108:519-526.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. National Cancer Institute. [2013]. Overview of the SEER Program, [online]. Available: http://seer.cancer.gov/about/overview.html [2016, January 23].

  13. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:613-619.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Medicode (Firm). ICD-9-CM: International classification of diseases, 9th revision, clinical modification. Salt Lake City, Utah: Medicode, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression, Second Edition. New York: Wiley, 2000.

  16. Paulson EC, Ra J, Armstrong K, Wirtalla C, Spitz F, Kelz RR. Underuse of esophagectomy as treatment for resectable esophageal cancer. Arch Surg 2008;143:1198-1203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dubecz A, Sepesi B, Salvador R, Polomsky M, Watson TJ, Raymond DP, Jones CE, Litle VR, Wisnivesky JP, Peters JH. Surgical resection for locoregional esophageal cancer is underutilized in the United States. J Am Coll Surg 2010;211:754-761.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, Steyerberg EW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BP, Richel DJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Hospers GA, Bonenkamp JJ, Cuesta MA, Blaisse RJ, Busch OR, ten Kate FJ, Creemers GJ, Punt CJ, Plukker JT, Verheul HM, Spillenaar Bilgen EJ, van Dekken H, van der Sangen MJ, Rozema T, Biermann K, Beukema JC, Piet AH, van Rij CM, Reinders JG, Tilanus HW, van der Gaast A. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 2012;366:2074-2084.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bedenne L, Michel P, Bouché O, Milan C, Mariette C, Conroy T, Pezet D, Roullet B, Seitz JF, Herr JP, Paillot B, Arveux P, Bonnetain F, Binguet C. Chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alone in squamous cancer of the esophagus: FFCD 9102. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:1160-1168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stahl M, Stuschke M, Lehmann N, Meyer HJ, Walz MK, Seeber S, Klump B, Budach W, Teichmann R, Schmitt M, Schmitt G, Franke C, Wilke H. Chemoradiation with and without surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2310-2317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Portale G, Hagen JA, Peters JH, Chan LS, DeMeester SR, Gandamihardja TA, DeMeester TR. Modern 5-year survival of resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma: single institution experience with 263 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2006;202:588-596.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, Wijnhoven BP, Tijssen JG, Fockens P, Stalmeier PF, ten Kate FJ, van Dekken H, Obertop H, Tilanus HW, van Lanschot JJ. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med, 2002;347:1662-1669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rentz J, Bull D, Harpole D, Bailey S, Neumayer L, Pappas T, Krasnicka B, Henderson W, Daley J, Khuri S. Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy: a prospective study of 945 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:1114-1120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Berry MF, Atkins BZ, Tong BC, Harpole DH, D’Amico TA, Onaitis MW. A comprehensive evaluation for aspiration after esophagectomy reduces the incidence of postoperative pneumonia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;140:1266-1271.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Chang AC, Lee J, Pickens A, Lau CL. Two thousand transhiatal esophagectomies: changing trends, lessons learned. Ann Surg 2007;246:363-372.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. [2007]. NCCN Guidelines for Treatment of Cancer by Site: Esophageal Cancer, [online]. Available: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp [2016, January 23].

  27. Markar SR, Bodnar A, Rosales J, Song G, Low DE. The impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on perioperative outcomes, tumor pathology, and survival in clinical stage II and III esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol, 2013;20:3935-3941.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kinugasa S, Tachibana M, Yoshimura H, Dhar DK, Shibakita M, Ohno S, Kubota H, Masunaga R, Nagasue N. Esophageal resection in elderly esophageal carcinoma patients: improvement in postoperative complications. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:414-418.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ellis FH Jr, Williamson WA, Heatley GJ. Cancer of the esophagus and cardia: does age influence treatment selection and surgical outcomes? J Am Coll Surg 1998;187:345-351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ruol A, Portale G, Zaninotto G, Cagol M, Cavallin F, Castoro C, Sileni VC, Alfieri R, Rampado S, Ancona E. Results of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: age has little influence on outcome and survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133:1186-1192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Molena D, Mungo B, Stem M, Lidor A. Does neo-adjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer increase postoperative morbidity or mortality? Dis Esophagus 2015;28(7):644-51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cheung MC, Koniaris LG, Yang R, Zhuge Y, Mackinnon JA, Byrne MM, Franceschi D. Do all patients with carcinoma of the esophagus benefit from treatment at teaching facilities? J Surg Oncol 2010;102:18-26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. van Vliet EP, Eijkemans MJ, Steyerberg EW, Kuipers EJ, Tilanus HW, van der Gaast A, Siersema PD. The role of socio-economic status in the decision making on diagnosis and treatment of oesophageal cancer in The Netherlands. Br J Cancer 2006;95:1180-1185.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Daren Jackson, PhD for his contribution in editing the paper.

Author Contributions

DM, MS, ALB, and AOL conceived or designed the work and acquired, analyzed, or interpreted data. DM, MS, ALB, and AOL drafted the work or revisited it critically for important intellectual content. DM, MS, ALB, and AOL approved the final version to be published.

Financial Support

Mr. Edwin Lewis provided generous support for Dr. Lidor’s Johns Hopkins Department of Surgery Research Fund.

Disclosures

The authors of this study have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.

Meeting Presentation

Plenary presentation at 2016 Digestive Disease Week (May 21–24, 2016) at the San Diego Convention Center in San Diego, CA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne O. Lidor.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Table 5 Treatment groups

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Molena, D., Stem, M., Blackford, A.L. et al. Esophageal Cancer Treatment Is Underutilized Among Elderly Patients in the USA. J Gastrointest Surg 21, 126–136 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3229-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3229-5

Keywords

Navigation