Abstract
Background
The need for additional procedures during a segmental elective colectomy is considered to lead to increased postoperative morbidity, but there have been few data that have validated and quantified this risk.
Purpose
We hypothesized that patients having additional procedures performed during a segmental colectomy have worse outcomes compared to patients undergoing a colectomy alone.
Patients and Methods
All patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database who underwent an elective open or laparoscopic segmental colectomy during 2005–2009 and met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. Using current procedural terminology (CPT) codes, patients were stratified into three groups. Group 1 only had CPT codes for a colectomy. Group 2 had additional CPT codes for procedures that were considered related to the colectomy, such as splenic flexure mobilization and endoscopy or a relatively minor procedure such as an appendectomy. Group 3 included patients that had additional procedures performed along with a segmental colectomy. Serious morbidity, overall morbidity, return to the operating room, and death were calculated and compared for each group.
Results
There were 25,996 patients in the open and 20,396 patients in the laparoscopic colectomy group. Thirty-six percent of patients in the open colectomy group vs. 18 % in the laparoscopic colectomy group had additional procedures performed. After adjustment for available differences in the groups, patients undergoing open and laparoscopic segmental colectomy along with an additional procedure had worse postoperative outcomes compared to patients undergoing a colectomy alone.
Limitations
The study is limited by the possibility of coding errors in the ACS NSQIP database leading to a case ascertainment bias and a selection bias given the observational nature of the study. It also could not differentiate between additional procedures that were planned or incidental at the time of surgery.
Conclusions
A proportion of patients undergoing elective open and laparoscopic segmental colon resections undergo additional procedures that adversely impact postoperative outcomes. This is mainly related to the type of additional procedures performed and therefore should be accounted for when counseling patients about the risks of surgery and in comparisons of outcomes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gillen S, Michalski CW, Schuster T, Feith M, Friess H, Kleeff J. Simultaneous/Incidental cholecystectomy during gastric/esophageal resection: systematic analysis of risks and benefits. World Journal of Surgery. May 2010;34(5):1008–1014.
Watemberg S, Landau O, Avrahami R, Nudelman IL, Reiss R. Incidental cholecystectomy in the over-70 age group. A 19-year retrospective, comparative study. International Surgery. Jan-Mar 1997;82(1):102–104.
Juhasz ES, Wolff BG, Meagher AP, Kluiber RM, Weaver AL, van Heerden JA. Incidental cholecystectomy during colorectal surgery. Annals of Surgery. May 1994;219(5):467–472; discussion 472–464.
Green JD, Birkhead G, Hebert J, Li M, Vogt RL. Increased morbidity in surgical patients undergoing secondary (incidental) cholecystectomy. Annals of Surgery. Jan 1990;211(1):50–54.
Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Pritts TA, Ko CY, Esposito TJ. Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 ACS NSQIP hospitals. Surgery. Oct 2010;148(4):625–635; discussion 635–627.
Kennedy GD, Heise C, Rajamanickam V, Harms B, Foley EF. Laparoscopy decreases postoperative complication rates after abdominal colectomy: results from the national surgical quality improvement program. Annals of Surgery. Apr 2009;249(4):596–601.
Pendlimari R, Cima RR, Wolff BG, Pemberton JH, Huebner M. Diagnoses influence surgical site infections (SSI) in colorectal surgery: a must consideration for SSI reporting programs? Journal of the American College of Surgeons. Apr 2012;214(4):574–580; discussion 580–571.
Hillingso JG, Wille-Jorgensen P. Staged or simultaneous resection of synchronous liver metastases from colorectal cancer–a systematic review. Colorectal Diseases. Jan 2009;11(1):3–10.
Chua HK, Sondenaa K, Tsiotos GG, Larson DR, Wolff BG, Nagorney DM. Concurrent vs. staged colectomy and hepatectomy for primary colorectal cancer with synchronous hepatic metastases. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. Aug 2004;47(8):1310–1316.
Fahy BN, D’Angelica M, DeMatteo RP, et al. Synchronous hepatic metastases from colon cancer: changing treatment strategies and results of surgical intervention. Annals of Surgical Oncology. Feb 2009;16(2):361–370.
Holubar SD, Wang JK, Wolff BG, et al. Splenic salvage after intraoperative splenic injury during colectomy. Arch Surg. Nov 2009;144(11):1040–1045.
Author’s Contribution
Hassan, Ahad, and Pacheco conceived and designed the study; Markwell and Pacheco acquired the data; Hassan, Ahad, Markwell, and Pacheco analyzed and interpreted the data; Hassan, and Pacheco drafted the manuscript; and Ahad made critical revisions of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hassan, I., Pacheco, P.E., Markwell, S.J. et al. Additional Procedures Performed During Elective Colon Surgery and Their Adverse Impact on Postoperative Outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 19, 527–534 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2711-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2711-1