Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic Versus Open Splenectomy and Esophagogastric Devascularization for Bleeding Varices or Severe Hypersplenism: a Comparative Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization are still uncertain. The aim of this study was to compare our results for laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization with those for open splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization.

Materials and Methods

From January 2008 to December 2011, 153 patients were diagnosed with portal hypertension and serious gastroesophageal varices in our institute, among which, 107 patients also had repeated upper gastrointestinal bleeding and 85 had severe hypersplenism. Eighty patients chose laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization and 73 patients underwent the open procedure. Results and outcomes were compared retrospectively.

Results

Nine patients underwent conversion to laparotomy in the laparoscopic group. We compared the laparoscopic group (80 patients) and the open group (73 patients). Operating times and the frequencies of blood transfusions were similar. Blood loss was less (P = 0.044), the passing of flatus was earlier (P = 0.041), and hospital stays were shorter (P = 0.028) in the laparoscopic group. Portal vein system thrombosis after laparoscopy was more frequent (P = 0.012) but the rates of main trunk occlusion were similar between the two groups. Pleural effusion after laparoscopy was less (P = 0.021) and, apart from this, there was no difference in other morbidities between the two groups. During a postoperative follow-up period of 2 to 50 months in 80 patients of the laparoscopic group vs. 73 patients of the open group, the incidence of esophagogastric variceal rebleeding, encephalopathy, and secondary liver cancer showed no significant differences. And the mortality rates for each of the groups were not different.

Conclusions

The short-term effects of laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization were better than those for open surgery, and the medium-term effects were similar between these two surgical approaches. Prospective randomized studies with a greater number of cases are needed to confirm the role of laparoscopy in splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schiedermaier P. Splanchnic hemodynamics: cirrhotic versus non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;19(s7):S150-S4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hong WD, Zhu QH, Huang ZM, Chen XR, Jiang ZC, Xu SH, et al. Predictors of esophageal varices in patients with HBV-related cirrhosis: a retrospective study. BMC Gastroenterol 2009;9:11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jensen DM. Endoscopic screening for varices in cirrhosis: findings, implications, and outcomes. Gastroenterology 2002;122(6):1620–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Feng LS, Chen XP: Combined splenocaval or mesocaval C shunt and portoazygous devascularization in the treatment of portal hypertension: analysis of 150 cases. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2006;5:70–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. De Cleva R, Herman P, D’Albuquerque LA, et al.: Pre- and postoperative systemic hemodynamic evaluation in patients subjected to esophagogastric devascularization plus splenectomy and distal splenorenal shunt: a comparative study in schistomomal portal hypertension. World J Gastroenterol 2007;13:5471–5475.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang Z, Qiu F: Pericardial devascularization with splenectomy for the treatment of portal hypertension. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2000; 38: 645–648.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Xiao-Zhong Jiang, Shao-Yong Zhao, Hong Luo, et al. Laparoscopic and open splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection for portal hypertension. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(27): 3421–3425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zheng X, Liu Q, Yao YM. Total Laparoscopic versus Open Splenectomy and Esophagogastric Devascularization in the Management of Portal Hypertension:A Comparative Study. Dig Surg 2009; 26:499–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Makoto Hashizume, Kazuo Tanoue, Makoto Morita, et al. Laparoscopic Gastric Devascularization and Splenectomy for Sclerotherapy-Resistant Esophagogastric Varices with Hypersplenism. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 3(187): 263–270.

  10. Wang YD, Ye H, Ye ZY, et al. Laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection for bleeding varices with hypersplenism. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2008;18:37–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. A branch of the Chinese Medical Association of Digestive Endoscopy (2000) The pilot program of endoscopic diagnosis and treatment guidelines with gastroesophageal varices. Chin J Dig Endosc, 17(4):198–199.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Peters MB Jr, Camacho D, Ojeda H, et al.: Defining the learning curve for laparoscopic splenectomy for immune thrombocytopenia purpura. Am J Surg 2004;188:522–525.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Belli G, Fantini C, D’agostino A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with histologically proven cirrhosis: short- and middle-term results. Surg Endosc 2007; 21:2004–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Postoperative complications of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy. Surg Endosc 1997;11:119–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cherqui D, Laurent A, Tayar C, et al. Laparoscopic liver resection for peripheral hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease: midterm results and perspectives. Ann Surg 2006;243:499–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ibrahim D, Giuseppe DG, Julien D, et al. Laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy: a comparative study. Am J Surg 2009;198:173–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pietrabissa A, Moretto C, Antonelli G, et al. Thrombosis in the portal venous system after elective laparoscopic splenectomy. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1140–1143.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Targarona EM. Portal vein thrombosis after laparoscopic splenectomy the size of the risk. Surg Innov.2008;15:266–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Winslow ER, Brunt LM, Drebin JA, et al. Portal vein thrombosis after splenectomy. Am J Surg. 2002;184:631–635.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fujita F, Lyass S, Otsuka K, et al. Portal vein thrombosis following splenectomy: identification of risk factors. Am Surg.2003;69:951–956.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Romano F, Caprotti R, Conti M, et al. Thrombosis of the splenoportal axis after splenectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg.2006;391:483–488.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ikeda M, Sekimoto M, Takiguchi S, et al. Total splenic vein thrombosis after laparoscopic splenectomy: a possible candidate for treatment. Am J Surg. 2007;193:21–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Harris W, Marcaccio M. Incidence of portal vein thrombosis after laparoscopic splenectomy. Can J Surg. 2005;48:352–354.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Romano F, Caprotti R, Scaini A, et al. Elective laparoscopic splenectomy and thrombosis of the spleno-portal axis: a prospective study with ecocolordoppler ultrasound. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percut Tech. 2006;16:4–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Petit P, Bret PM, Atri M, et al. Splenic vein thrombosis after splenectomy: frequency and role of imaging. Radiology. 1994;190:65–68.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Loring LA, Panicek DM, Karpeh MS. Portal system thrombosis after splenectomy for neoplasms or chronic haematologic disorder: is routine surveillance imaging necessary? J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998;22:856–860.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chaffanjan PC, Brichon PY, Ranchoup Y, et al. Portal vein thrombosis following splenectomy for haematologic disease: prospective study with Doppler color flow imaging. World J Surg. 1998;22:1082–1086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. van’t Riet M, Burger JW, van Muiswinkel JM, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of portal vein thrombosis following splenectomy. Br J Surg. 2000;87:1229–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rattner DW, Ellman L, Warshaw AL. Portal vein thrombosis after elective splenectomy: an underappreciated potentially lethal syndrome. Arch Surg. 1993;128:565–569.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Jakimowicz J, Stultiens G, Smulders F. Laparoscopic insufflation of the abdomen reduces portal venous flow. Surg Endosc, 1998, 12 ( 2 ): 129—132.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sala Blanch x, Fontanals J, Martinez Palli G, et a1. Effects of carbon dioxide vs helium pneumoperitoneum on hepatic blood flow. Surg Endosc, 1998, 12( 9 ): 1121—1125.

  32. Mann c, Boccara G, Pouzeratte Y, et a1. The relationship among carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum, vasopressin release, and hemodynamic changes. Anesth Analg, 1999, 89( 2 ) : 278 – 283.

  33. Ma RY, Liu Z-M, Zhang T, et al. (2009) Influence on thrombus formation by blood flow in T-bifurcation of artery. Journal of Medical Biomechanics (Engl), 24(2): 98–106.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 2009NSFC30972948).

Conflict of interest

Nothing to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zheng Shu-guo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhe, C., Jian-wei, L., Jian, C. et al. Laparoscopic Versus Open Splenectomy and Esophagogastric Devascularization for Bleeding Varices or Severe Hypersplenism: a Comparative Study. J Gastrointest Surg 17, 654–659 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2150-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2150-4

Keywords

Navigation