Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do not Deny Pancreatic Resection to Elderly Patients

  • original article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Introduction

Radical resection is the only potential cure for pancreatic malignancies and a useful treatment for other benign diseases, such as pancreatitis. Over the last two decades, medical and surgical improvements have drastically changed the postoperative outcome of elderly patients undergoing pancreatic resection, and appropriate treatment for elderly potential candidates for pancreatic resection has become an important issue.

Materials and Methods

Ninety-eight consecutive patients undergoing radical pancreatic resection between 2003 and 2006 at the Surgery Unit of the University of Modena, Italy, were considered and divided into two age groups, i.e., over 75-year-olds (group 1, 23 patients) and under 75-year-olds (group 2, 75 patients). The two groups were compared as regards demographic features, American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, comorbidities, previous major surgery, surgical procedure, postoperative mortality, and morbidity.

Results

There were no significant differences between the two groups concerning postoperative mortality, and the duration of hospital stay and days in the postoperative intensive care unit were also similar. Complications such as pancreatic fistulas, wound infections, and pneumonia were more frequent in the older group, but the differences were not statistically significant. The overall median survival was 29.4 months and did not differ significantly between the two groups when calculated using the log-rank test (p = 0.961).

Discussion

In the light of these findings and as reported for other series, old age is probably not directly related with any increase in the rate of postoperative complications, but comorbidities (which are naturally related to the patients’ previous life) may have a key role in the postoperative course.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wagner M, Kulli C, Friess H, Seiler CA, Büchler MW. Surgery of pancreatic carcinoma. Swiss Surg 2000;6(5):264–270. doi:10.1024/1023-9332.6.5.264.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. van Geenen RC, ten Kate FJ, de Wit LT, van Gulik TM, Obertop H, Gouma DJ. Segmental resection and wedge excision of the portal or superior mesenteric vein during pancreatoduodenectomy. Surgery 2001;129(2):158–163. doi:10.1067/msy.2001.110221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Spanknebel K, Conlon KC. Advances in the surgical management of pancreatic cancer. Cancer J 2001;7(4):312–323.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shore S, Vimalachandran D, Raraty MG, Ghaneh P. Cancer in the elderly: pancreatic cancer. Surg Oncol 2004;13(4):201–210. doi:10.1016/j.suronc.2004.11.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Kaufman HS, Coleman J. One hundred and forty-five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality. Ann Surg 1993;217(5):430–435. discussion 435–438, doi:10.1097/00000658-199305010-00002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Balcom JH 4th, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, Chang Y, Fernandez-del Castillo C. Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg 2001;136(4):391–398. doi:10.1001/archsurg.136.4.391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wagner M, Redaelli C, Lietz M, Seiler CA, Friess H, Büchler MW. Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 2004;91(5):586–594. doi:10.1002/bjs.4484.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Casadei R, Zanini N, Morselli-Labate AM, Calculli L, Pezzilli R, Potì O et al. Prognostic factors in periampullary and pancreatic tumor resection in elderly patients. World J Surg 2006;30(11):1992–2001. discussion 2002–3, doi:10.1007/s00268-006-0122-5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fentinam IS, Tirellei U, Monfardini S. Cancer in the elderly: why so badly treated? Lancet 1990;335:1020–1022. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(90)91075-L.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fong Y, Blumgart LH, Fortner JG, Brennan MF. Pancreatic or liver resection for malignancy is safe and effective for the elderly. Ann Surg 1995;222:426–437.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lightner AM, Glasgow RE, Jordan TH, Krassner AD, Way LW, Mulvihill SJ et al. Pancreatic resection in the elderly. J Am Coll Surg 2004;198:697–706. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.12.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bathe OF, Levi D, Caldera H, Franceschi D, Raez L, Patel A et al. Radical resection of periampullary tumors in the elderly: evaluation of long-term results. World J Surg 2000;24:353–358. doi:10.1007/s002689910056.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Spencer MP, Sarr MG, Nagorney DM. Radical pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer in the elderly. Is it safe and justified? Ann Surg 1990;212:140–143. doi:10.1097/00000658-199008000-00004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM, Thomas EJ, Polanczyk CA, Cook EF et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation 1999;100:1043–1049.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pauwels RA, Buist AS, Calverley PM, Jenkins CR, Hurd SS. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. NHLBI/WHO Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Workshop summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:1256–1276.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2003;26(Suppl 1):S5–S20. doi:10.2337/diacare.26.2007.S5.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Calculli L, Casadei R, Amore B, Albini Riccioli L, Minni F, Caputo M et al. The usefulness of spiral computer tomography and color-Doppler ultrasonography to predict portal-mesenteric trunk involvement in pancreatic cancer. Radiol Med (Torino). 2002;104:307–315.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM, Sauter PK, Zahurak ML, Talamini MA et al. A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 1995;222:580–588.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005;138:8–13. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Herter FP, Cooperman AM, Ahlborn TN, Antinori C. Surgical experience with pancreatic and periampullary cancer. Ann Surg. 1982;195(3):274–281. doi:10.1097/00000658-198203000-00006.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lerut JP, Gianello PR, Otte JB, Kestens PJ. Pancreaticoduodenal resection. Surgical experience and evaluation of risk factors in 103 patients. Ann Surg 1984;199(4):432–437. doi:10.1097/00000658-198404000-00010.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nitecki SS, Sarr MG, Colby TV, van Heerden JA. Long-term survival after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Is it really improving? Ann Surg 1995;221(1):59–66. doi:10.1097/00000658-199501000-00007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sener SF, Fremgen A, Menck HR, Winchester DP. Pancreatic cancer: a report of treatment and survival trends for 100,313 patients diagnosed from 1985–1995, using the National Cancer Database. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;189(1):1–7. doi:10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00075-7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Richter A, Niedergethmann M, Sturm JW, Lorenz D, Post S, Trede M. Long-term results of partial pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head: 25-year experience. World J Surg. 2003;27(3):324–329. doi:10.1007/s00268-002-6659-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Karl RC, Smith SK, Fabri PJ. Validity of major cancer operations in elderly patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 1995;2(2):107–113. doi:10.1007/BF02303624.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. al-Sharaf K, Andrén-Sandberg A, Ihse I. Subtotal pancreatectomy for cancer can be safe in the elderly. Eur J Surg. 1999;165(3):230–235. doi:10.1080/110241599750007090.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hodul P, Tansey J, Golts E, Oh D, Pickleman J, Aranha GV. Age is not a contraindication to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am Surg. 2001;67(3):270–275. discussion 275–2766.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Richter A, Niedergethmann M, Lorenz D, Sturm JW, Trede M, Post S. Resection for cancers of the pancreatic head in patients aged 70 years or over. Eur J Surg 2002;168(6):339–344. doi:10.1080/11024150260284842.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Brozzetti S, Mazzoni G, Miccini M, Puma F, De Angelis M, Cassini D et al. Surgical treatment of pancreatic head carcinoma in elderly patients. Arch Surg. 2006;141(2):137–142. doi:10.1001/archsurg.141.2.137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Talamini MA, Hruban RH et al. Should pancreaticoduodenectomy be performed in octogenarians? J Gastrointest Surg 1998;2(3):207–216. doi:10.1016/S1091-255X(98)80014-0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Ballarin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ballarin, R., Spaggiari, M., Di Benedetto, F. et al. Do not Deny Pancreatic Resection to Elderly Patients. J Gastrointest Surg 13, 341–348 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0601-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0601-0

Keywords

Navigation