Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal allocation between bank loans and treasuries with regret

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Optimization Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The main categories of assets held by banks are loans, Treasuries (bonds issued by the national Treasury), reserves and intangible assets. In our contribution, we investigate the investment of bank funds in loans and Treasuries with the aim of generating an optimal final fund level. Our results take behavioral aspects such as risk and regret into account. More specifically, we apply a branch of optimization theory that enables us to consider a regret attribute alongside a risk component as an integral part of the utility function. In this case, regret-aversion corresponds to the convexity of the regret function and the bank’s preference is assumed to be representable by optimization subject to the utility. In addition, we provide a comparison between risk- and regret-averse banks in terms of optimal asset allocation between loans and Treasuries. A feature of our contribution is that these and other optimization issues are analyzed briefly and, where possible, represented graphically. Furthermore, we comment on the claim that an investment away from loans towards Treasuries is responsible for credit crunches in the banking industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards; A Revised Framework. Bank for International Settlements (June 2004). http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs107.pdf

  2. Bell D.E.: Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Oper. Res. 30, 961–981 (1982)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Fischer K.P.: Pricing pension fund guarantees: a discrete martingale approach. Can. J. Adm. Sci. 16, 256–266 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gollier, C., Salanie, B.: Individual decisions under risk, risk-sharing and asset prices with regret. Working Paper (2005)

  5. Loomes G., Sugden R.: Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Econ. J. 92, 805–824 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mulaudzi, M,P., Petersen, M.A., Schoeman, I.M.: Risk and regret in the banking sector. In: Electronic Proceedings of the 4th IASTED International Conference on Financial Engineering and Applications (FEA2007). UC Berkeley, Berkeley California USA, 24-27 September 2007, Paper no. 588-013

  7. Quiggin J.: Regret theory with general choice sets. J. Risk Uncertain. 8, 153–165 (1994)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Sugden R.: An axiomatic foundation of regret. J Econ. Theor. 60, 159–180 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. P. Mulaudzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mulaudzi, M.P., Petersen, M.A. & Schoeman, I.M. Optimal allocation between bank loans and treasuries with regret. Optim Lett 2, 555–566 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-008-0082-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-008-0082-9

Keywords

Navigation