Abstract
We develop and analyse a deterministic population-based ordinary differential equation of malaria transmission to consider the impact of three common assumptions of malaria models: (1) malaria infection does not change the attractiveness of humans to mosquitoes; (2) exposed mosquitoes (infected with malaria but not yet infectious to humans) have the same biting rate as susceptible mosquitoes; and (3) mosquitoes infectious to humans have the same biting rate as susceptible mosquitoes. We calculate the basic reproductive number, \(R_0\), for this model and show the existence of a transcritical bifurcation at \(R_0=1\), in common with most epidemiological models. We further show that for some sets of parameter values, this bifurcation can be backward (subcritical). We show with numerical simulations that increasing the relative attractiveness of infectious humans, increases \(R_0\) but reduces the equilibrium prevalence of infectious humans; decreasing the biting rate of exposed mosquitoes increases \(R_0\) and the equilibrium prevalence of infectious humans and mosquitoes; and increasing the biting rate of infectious mosquitoes has no impact on \(R_0\) or the equilibrium prevalence of infectious humans, but decreases the infectious prevalence of infectious mosquitoes. These analyses of a simple malaria model show that common assumptions around the relative attractiveness of infectious humans and the relative biting rates of exposed and infectious mosquitoes can have substantial and counter-intuitive effects on malaria transmission dynamics.
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Introduction
Malaria is an infectious disease of humans, usually transmitted through the bites of Anopheline mosquitoes. Female mosquitoes bite humans (and other warm-blooded animals) for blood meals to provide protein for egg development. During each feed, the mosquito injects some saliva into the host to prevent clotting before sucking the blood into its stomach. After ingesting the blood, the mosquito rests for two to three days (depending on the ambient temperature) while it digests the blood. The mosquito then searches for a water body where it lays the eggs and then seeks another host to repeat its feeding cycle [23].
Mosquitoes experience different levels of mortality risk during the different phases of the feeding cycle. Host-seeking and attempting to feed on hosts is the most dangerous part of the cycle, where mosquitoes are most likely to die. The resting phase is usually the safest where mosquitoes are stationary. However, the mortality risks of the different stages can be altered by malaria control interventions. For example, insecticide-treated nets increase the mortality of host-seeking mosquitoes and indoor residual spraying with insecticides increases the mortality of resting mosquitoes [12].
Infectious mosquitoes contain malaria sporozoites in their salivary glands and infect humans when they inject saliva into them. In humans, the sporozoites pass through liver and asexual blood stages before transforming into infective sexual stages (called gametocytes). The incubation period in humans is relatively short (about 20 days) but the infectious period can last for multiple months. Humans infect mosquitoes when a mosquito sucks up a male and a female gametocyte during her blood meal. The gametocytes then fuse in the mosquito’s stomach to eventually form an oocyst that releases sporozoites (that then travel to the mosquito’s salivary glands to complete the malaria life cycle). The incubation period in the mosquito is about 10–12 days long, which is on the same order as the mosquito’s life span so it has a substantial effect on malaria epidemiology and control [16].
Recent evidence has shown that malaria parasites can affect the mosquito’s host-seeking behaviour to increase their probability of transmission [1, 19, 20]. Mosquitoes with oocysts (who are infected but not yet infectious) tend to be less mobile and spend more time resting. They therefore have longer feeding cycles and experience a lower mortality rate than uninfected mosquitoes. Mosquitoes with sporozoites tend to be more restless and are likely to take multiple blood meals in a single feeding cycle (that is, they bite multiple hosts before resting). Therefore, although they experience a higher mortality rate than uninfected mosquitoes, they also feed more frequently and thereby infect humans more often than they would if their feeding rate was unchanged.
Additionally, there is evidence that humans with a high density of gametocytes are more attractive to mosquitoes than humans without gametocytes [21], thereby making it easier for infectious humans to transmit to mosquitoes.
There is a long history of mathematical models of malaria starting with Ronald Ross’ first ordinary differential equation (ODE) model for the proportion of infectious humans and mosquitoes [26]. Most models developed since then have been similar deterministic population-based models [2, 3, 10, 24, 25] although recently stochastic individual-based simulation models have increased in prominence [17, 28]. However, these models have rarely considered the impact of malaria infection in mosquitoes on their feeding frequency or the impact of malaria infection in humans on their attractiveness to mosquitoes.
Here we develop a simple deterministic population-based model that extends existing models to include these effects. We first describe the model and perform a qualitative analysis to show the existence of disease-free and endemic equilibrium points, and the possibility of a backward transcritical bifurcation that is common to many such malaria models. We finally perform some numerical simulations that illustrate the effects of varying the infection-state dependent mosquito biting frequency and the relative attractiveness of infectious humans.
2 The model
We assume that the mosquito population is divided into three disjoint compartments: susceptible, exposed (mosquitoes carrying oocysts), and infectious (mosquitoes carrying malaria sporozoites). We denote the three populations at time t as \(S_v(t)\), \(E_v(t)\) and \(I_v(t)\), respectively. In order to account for the effects of malaria parasites on the mosquito’s host-seeking behaviour [1, 19, 20], we introduce two positive constants, \(\varphi _E\), and \(\varphi _I\), to represent the biting rate of exposed and infectious mosquitoes relative to susceptible mosquitoes, with \(\varphi _E <1\) and \(\varphi _I >1\).
Furthermore, by using the modelling approach employed first in [9] and later in [4–6, 29], we divide humans into two compartments: susceptible, \(S_h(t)\), who are not infected with malaria, and infectious, \(I_h(t)\), who carry gametocytes. We denote the increased relative attractiveness of infectious humans as compared to susceptible humans (vector-bias parameter) by p. For simplicity, we assume that humans infected with malaria are always infectious; thus ignoring the incubation period and any variations in gametocyte density over time.
The balance equations lead to the following system of nonlinear ODES,
where the upper dots denote the time derivative. The terms \(\lambda _h(t)\) and \(\lambda _v(t)\) denote the forces of infection on humans and vectors, respectively. The infection rate per susceptible human and per susceptible vector are given, respectively, by,
The description and the baseline values of the parameters in (1) and (2) are given in Table 1.
Denoting by \(N_h\) the total human population and by \(N_v\) the total vector population, i.e., \(N_h=S_h+I_h\), and \(N_v=S_v+E_v+I_v\), it easily follows that the feasible region for model (1) is
where \(\bar{\mathbb {R}}_+^n\) denotes the non-negative orthant of \(\mathbb {R}^n\).
3 Local stability analysis of the disease-free equilibrium point
It is easy to check that model (1) admits the disease-free equilibrium (DFE) given by
We use the next generation matrix method [13, 14] to derive the basic reproduction number \(R_0\). The ‘infected’ compartments of model (1) are \(I_h\), \(E_v\) and \(I_v\). The ‘new infection’ matrix F and the ‘transition’ matrix V defined in [14] are given, respectively, by
The the basic reproduction number is the dominant eigenvalue of the next generation matrix \(FV^{-1}\),
Theorem 1
The disease-free equilibrium \(E_0\), given by (3), is locally asymptotically stable if \(R_0 <1\) and unstable if \(R_0 >1\), where \(R_0\) is given by (4).
This theorem follows from a straightforward application of Theorem 2 in [14] and showing that the model equations satisfy the five assumptions (A1)–(A5) in [14]. We note that the basic reproduction number may be written as \(R_0=\sqrt{K_h\,K_v}\), where:
and
The quantity \(K_h\) is the number of mosquitoes infected by one human during his/her infectious life time. It is the product of the biting rate of a susceptible mosquito, the ratio of mosquitoes to humans at the disease-free equilibrium, the vector-bias parameter, the probability of disease transmission from infectious humans to susceptible mosquito per bite, and the average infectious period in humans. The quantity \(K_v\) is the number of humans infected by one mosquito during her infectious life time. It is the product of the biting rate of infectious mosquitoes, the probability of disease transmission from infectious mosquito to susceptible human per bite, the average duration of the infectious period in mosquitoes, and the probability that a mosquito survives the exposed period. The basic reproduction number \(R_0\) is the geometric mean of \(K_h\) and \(K_v\) since the infection from human to human goes through one generation of mosquitoes. We note that the increased frequency of biting of infectious, \(\varphi _I\), cancels out in \(K_v\) so it does not influence \(R_0\).
4 Endemic equilibrium points
By endemic, we mean an equilibrium of system (1) where all components are positive. The components are solutions of the following system,
We let \(E=\left( S^{*}_h,I^{*}_h,S^{*}_v,E^{*}_v,I^{*}_v\right) \) represent any generic endemic equilibrium point of (1) and let
be the forces of infection of humans and vectors at steady state, respectively. Solving equations (5) for the state variables provides
where we have used the notation,
Substituting (7) in (6) we get
and
By substituting (10) in (9), it can be shown that equilibria components satisfy the following equation,
where the coefficients are given by,
where \(R_0\) is the basic reproduction number, given by (4). Equation (11) admits a trivial solution \(\lambda ^{*}_h=0\) which corresponds to the disease-free equilibrium \(E_0\) (3). Now, we assume \(\lambda ^{*}_h\ne 0\). The existence of endemic equilibria is regulated by the quadratic equation \(a_0(\lambda ^{*}_h)^{2}+b_0\lambda ^{*}_h+c_0=0\). Note that the coefficient \(a_0\) is always positive, and \(c_0\) is positive (resp. negative) if \(R_0\) is less than (resp. greater than) unity, respectively. The coefficient \(b_0\) may be rearranged as:
where
It follows that the number of endemic equilibria of model (1) depends on the coefficients \(a_0\), \(b_0\) and \(c_0\) as follows:
-
(1)
There is a unique endemic equilibrium if \(c_0<0\) (i.e., \(R_0>1\));
-
(2)
There is a unique endemic equilibrium if
$$\begin{aligned} (b_0<0\;\;\; \mathrm{and}\;\;\; c_0=0)\;\;\; \mathrm{or} \;\;\; (b_0<0,\;\;\; c_0>0\;\;\;\mathrm{and}\;\;\; b^{2}_0-4a_0c_0=0) ; \end{aligned}$$(14) -
(3)
There are two endemic equilibria if
$$\begin{aligned} b_0<0,\;\;\; c_0>0\;\;\;\mathrm{and}\;\;\; b^{2}_0-4a_0c_0>0; \end{aligned}$$(15) -
(4)
There are no endemic equilibria otherwise.
The results of this section may be summarized in the following:
Theorem 2
If \(R_0<1\), there exists an endemic equilibrium if conditions (14) are satisfied; two endemic equilibria if conditions (15) are satisfied; and no endemic equilibria otherwise. If \(R_0>1\), then there exists a unique endemic equilibrium.
A relevant aspect of this result is that conditions (15) indicate the occurrence of multiple endemic equilibria for \(R_0<1\). Specifically, the disease-free equilibrium may co-exist with one or two endemic equilibria. From an epidemiological perspective, this means that the elimination of the disease in the population is no longer guaranteed by the classical threshold condition \(R_0<1\). A new, smaller, threshold for \(R_0\) must be determined. To this aim, we now express condition (15) in terms of the basic reproduction number \(R_0\) as follows. Note that coefficient \(b_0<0\) is equivalent to \(R_0>R_c\), and \(c_0>0\) is equivalent to \(R_0<1\). Note also that \(b_0^2-4a_0c_0>0\) is equivalent to
where,
Equation (16) admits positive real roots if and only if \(b_1<0\) and \(\Delta =b_1^2-4a_1c_1\ge 0\). We can write
where
Choosing \(\psi <0\) ensures that \(\mu p-k_{3}<0\), which implies \(\Delta >0\) and \(b_1<0\).
Setting
it follows that condition (15) is equivalent to
Remark 1
Condition (19) can be also expressed in terms of \(\omega \). Setting,
and using the expression of \(R_0\), we obtain,
where,
5 Bifurcation analysis
In this section we show that the sub-threshold occurrence of multiple endemic equilibria, as stated in Theorem 2, is the result of a transcritical backward (subcritical) bifurcation at \(R_0=1\). This will also provide insight on the local stability properties of the endemic equilibria emerging from the bifurcation.
We study the centre manifold near the criticality by using the approach developed in [7, 14, 15], based on general centre manifold theory [18]. In summary, this approach establishes that the normal form representing the dynamics of the system on the centre manifold is given by \(\dot{u} = a u^2+ b \xi u\), where,
and
Here, the symbol \(\xi \) denotes a bifurcation parameter to be chosen, \(f_i\)s denote the right hand side of system (1), \({\mathbf x}\) denotes the state vector, \({\mathbf x}_0\) the disease-free equilibrium \(E_0\), \(D_{\mathbf {x}}\) denotes the differential operator with respect to \(\mathbf {x}\), \(D_{\xi }\) denotes the differential operator with respect to \(\xi \), and v and w denote the left and right eigenvectors, respectively, corresponding to the null eigenvalue of the Jacobian matrix of system (1) evaluated at \({\mathbf x}_0\) for \(\xi =0\).
We choose the mosquito biting rate, \(\omega \), as the bifurcation parameter. We observe that \(R_0=1\) is equivalent to:
so that the disease-free equilibrium \(E_0\) is locally asymptotically stable when \(\omega <\omega ^{*}\), and unstable when \(\omega >\omega ^{*}\) . Hence, \(\omega =\omega ^{*}\) is a bifurcation value.
The Jacobian matrix of system (1), evaluated at \(E_0\) for \(\omega =\omega ^{*}\) is given by
where \(k_1\) and \(k_2\) are defined in (8). The eigenvalues are given by \(\lambda _1=-\mu \), \(\lambda _2=-\eta \), and \(\lambda _3\), \(\lambda _4\), \(\lambda _5\) eigenvalues of the submatrix,
The characteristic equation of \(\bar{\mathcal {J}}\) is given by
where
and \(R_0\) is given by (4). Since \(R_0=1\) at the criticality, equation (26) becomes
Thus, the Jacobian \(J^{*}\) of the linearised system has a simple zero eigenvalue and the other eigenvalues have negative real part. Therefore the disease-free equilibrium \(E_0\) is a nonhyperbolic equilibrium. In order to determine the coefficients (23) and (24), we look for the right and left eigenvectors corresponding to the zero eigenvalue. The components \(w_i\), for \(i=1,\cdots ,5\), of the right eigenvector \(\mathbf {w}\) are given by:
Analogously, the components \(v_i\), for \(i=1,\cdots ,5\), of the left eigenvector \(\mathbf {v}\) are given by,
Therefore for \(w_5>0,\;\;v_5>0\), we have,
and,
Considering only the nonzero components of the left eigenvector, \(\mathbf {v}\), it follows that:
where,
so that,
where,
The analysis performed in this sections may be summarized in the following theorem:
Theorem 3
If \(A_0<0\), then the malaria model (1) exhibits a backward bifurcation at \(R_0=1\). If \(A_0 > 0\), then the bifurcation is forward.
Remark 2
The change of stability of \(E_0\), from being stable to unstable, as \(R_0\) crosses the critical value \(R_0=1\), implies that \(b>0\) (see [14]). In our case, direct calculations shows that
In the special case where there is no disease-induced death, i.e, \(\alpha =0\), we have
where
Since, by definition, \(p>1 \implies 2p-1>0\), it follows that in absence of disease induced death, the bifurcation is forward. Indeed, \(\alpha =0 \implies A_0>0 \implies a<0\).
Finally, note also that when \(\alpha =0\), the coefficients of equation (11) become,
We see that \(a_0\) is always positive. Additionally, since \(p>1\), it follows that \(b_0\) and \(c_0\) are always nonnegative whenever \(R_0<1\). Therefore, there are no endemic equilibria bifurcating from the disease-free equilibrium when \(R_0<1\).
6 Numerical simulations
We illustrate the backward bifurcation with numerical simulations in Figure 1 using the set of parameter values listed in Table 1, except with \(\Lambda _h=4\), \(\mu =1/(30\cdot 365)\), \(\Lambda _v=10^8/14\), \(\alpha =10^{-3}\), \(\delta =1/100\), \(\eta =1/14\), \(\pi _h=0.75\), \(\pi _m=0.8\), \(\varphi _E=1\), \(\varphi _I=2\), \(p=4\), and varying \(\omega \). In the particular case \(\omega =4.802\times 10^{-4}\), the conditions required by Theorem 2, case (15), are satisfied, as well as \(A_0=-0.0000020 <0\) (so that \( a=0.00000020>0\)) in Theorem 3. In particular, for this set of parameter values, \(R_{c}=0.8193476<1\), \(R_{0}=0.9452627<1\), \(\psi =-5.1714\times 10^{-5}\), \(R_{+}=0.9444190\), \(R_{-}=0.0020\) (so that \(\max (R_{c},R_{+})<R_{0}<1\)). Furthermore, \(a_0=0.0533>0\), \(b_0=- 0.0000977<0\) and \(c_0=4.342\times 10^{-8}>0\), so that \(b_{0}^{2}-4a_0c_0=2.750\times 10^{-10}>0\). The resulting two endemic equilibria \(E=(S^{*}_h,I^{*}_h,S^{*}_v,E^{*}_v,I^{*}_v)\), are given by: \(E^{*}=(20333, 1964, 99850354, 65808, 41919 )\), which is locally asymptotically stable and \(E^{**}=(24079, 1650, 99884413, 50830, 32379 )\), which is unstable.
Figure 2 shows that increasing the relative attractiveness of infectious humans, p, increases \(R_0\). Figure 3 shows numerical simulations of the malaria model (1) for different values of p. The curve for \(p=1\) shows the result for the assumption used in most malaria models: that malaria infection makes no difference to the attractiveness of humans. We see here that increasing p decreases the equilibrium prevalence of infectious humans, contrary to the effect of p on \(R_0\), but does not affect the equilibrium prevalence of infectious mosquitoes.
Figure 4 shows that increasing the relative biting frequency of exposed mosquitoes, \(\varphi _E\), decreases \(R_0\). Figure 5 shows numerical simulations of (1) for different values of \(\varphi _E\). Consistent with the effect on \(R_0\), increasing \(\varphi _E\) decreases the equilibrium prevalence of infectious humans and mosquitoes (with a stronger impact on the prevalence of mosquitoes).
The relative biting frequency of infectious mosquitoes does not appear in the expression for \(R_0\) so changing this parameter has no effect on \(R_0\). Figure 6 shows numerical simulations of (1) for different values of \(\varphi _I\). Increasing \(\varphi _I\) makes no difference to the equilibrium prevalence of infectious humans, but leads to a large decrease in the equilibrium prevalence of infectious mosquitoes.
Figure 7 shows that the effects of simultaneously increasing p and \(\varphi _E\) on \(R_0\) are consistent with the one-dimensional sensitivity analyses shown in Figures 2 and 4. Additionally, as p increases, the dependence of \(R_0\) on \(\varphi _E\) increases.
7 Discussion and conclusions
We developed and analysed a simple malaria model to investigate the impact of relaxing three assumptions that mathematical models of malaria commonly make. We allowed the relative attractiveness of infectious humans (as compared to susceptible humans) to mosquitoes to increase; the feeding frequency of exposed mosquitoes (as compared to susceptible mosquitoes) to decrease; and the feeding frequency of infectious mosquitoes (as compared to susceptible mosquitoes) to increase.
We derived the basic reproductive number, \(R_0\), that provides a threshold condition for when the disease-free equilibrium loses stability. We showed that in common with many similar models of malaria, there is a transcritical bifurcation at \(R_0=1\), that can be forward or backward depending on the parameter values, and is always forward if there is no disease-induced death rate. We provided threshold conditions for the direction of the bifurcation and the existence of zero, one or two endemic equilibrium points.
As may be expected, we showed that as the relative attractiveness of infectious humans, p, increases, \(R_0\) increases. However, we also showed the surprising result that as p increases, the equilibrium proportion of infectious humans decreases, even as \(R_0\) increases. This is because mosquitoes repeatedly bite infectious humans so they are less likely to pass the infection to susceptible humans, and therefore the same proportion of infectious mosquitoes leads to a lower proportion of infectious humans for higher values of p.
We showed that as the relative biting rate of exposed mosquitoes, \(\varphi _E\), increases, \(R_0\) and the equilibrium proportion of infectious humans and mosquitoes decreases. This is reasonable because as the biting rate of exposed mosquitoes increases, their mortality increases so fewer exposed mosquitoes are likely to survive to become infectious.
We finally showed that varying the relative biting rate of infectious mosquitoes, \(\varphi _I\), has no impact on \(R_0\) because the increased biting rate is cancelled by the shorter life span of the infectious mosquitoes. Correspondingly, varying \(\varphi _I\) has no impact on the equilibrium proportion of infectious humans. However, increasing \(\varphi _I\) leads to a substantial decrease in the equilibrium proportion of infectious mosquitoes because of their higher death rate. Importantly for malaria transmission, these fewer infectious mosquitoes are able to maintain transmission to humans at a higher level than if their biting rate was lower. These analyses of a simple malaria model show that common assumptions around the relative attractiveness of infectious humans and the relative biting rates of exposed and infectious mosquitoes can have substantial and counter-intuitive effects on malaria transmission dynamics.
Change history
07 August 2017
An erratum to this article has been published.
References
Anderson, R.A., Koella, J.C., Hurd, H.: The effect of Plasmodium yoelii nigeriensis infection on the feeding persistence of Anopheles stephensi Liston throughout the sporogonic cycle. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 266(1430), 1729–1733 (1999)
Aron, J.L.: Mathematical modeling of immunity to malaria. Math. Biosci. 90, 385–396 (1988)
Avila-Vales, E., Buonomo, B.: Analysis of a mosquito-borne disease transmission model with vector stages and nonlinear forces of infection. Ricerche mat. 64(2), 377–390 (2015)
Buonomo, B.: Analysis of a malaria model with mosquito host choice and bed-net control. Int. J. Biomath. 1550, 077 (2015)
Buonomo, B., Vargas-De-León, C.: Stability and bifurcation analysis of a vector-bias model of malaria transmission. Math. Biosci. 242(1), 59–67 (2013)
Buonomo, B., Vargas-De-León, C.: Effects of mosquitoes host choice on optimal intervention strategies for malaria control. Acta Applicandae Mathematicae 132(1), 127–138 (2014)
Castillo-Chavez, C., Song, B.: Dynamical models of tuberculosis and their applications. Math. Biosci. Eng. 1(2), 361–404 (2004)
Cator, L.J., Lynch, P.A., Thomas, M.B., Read, A.F.: Alterations in mosquito behaviour by malaria parasites: potential impact on force of infection. Malaria J. 13, 164 (2014)
Chamchod, F., Britton, N.F.: Analysis of a vector-bias model on malaria transmission. Bull. Math. Biol. 73(3), 639–657 (2011)
Chitnis, N., Cushing, J.M., Hyman, J.M.: Bifurcation analysis of a mathematical model for malaria transmission. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 67(1), 24–45 (2006)
Chitnis, N., Hyman, J.M., Cushing, J.M.: Determining important parameters in the spread of malaria through the sensitivity analysis of a mathematical model. Bull. Math. Biol. 70(5), 1272–1296 (2008)
Chitnis, N., Smith, T., Steketee, R.: A mathematical model for the dynamics of malaria in mosquitoes feeding on a heterogeneous host population. J. Biol. Dyn. 2(3), 259–285 (2008)
Diekmann, O., Heesterbeek, H., Britton, T.: Mathematical Tools for Understanding Infectious Diseases Dynamics. Princeton Series in Theoretical and Computational Biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2013)
van den Driessche, P., Watmough, J.: Reproduction numbers and sub-threshold endemic equilibria for compartmental models of disease transmission. Math. Biosci. 180, 29–48 (2002)
Dushoff, J., Huang, W., Castillo-Chavez, C.: Backward bifurcations and catastrophe in simple models of fatal diseases. J. Math. Biol. 36, 227–248 (1998)
Garnham, P.C.C.: Malaria parasites of man: life-cycles nad morphology (excluding ultrastructure). In: W.H. Wernsdorfer, I. McGregor (eds.) Malaria: Principles and Practice of Malariology, vol. 1, chap. 2, pp. 61–96. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh (1988)
Griffin, J.T., Hollingsworth, T.D., Okell, L.C., Churcher, T.S., White, M., Hinsley, W., Bousema, T., Drakeley, C.J., Ferguson, N.M., Basáñez, M.G., Ghani, A.C.: Reducing plasmodium falciparum malaria transmission in Africa: a model-based evaluation of intervention strategies. PLOS Med. 7(8), e1000, 324 (2010)
Guckenheimer, J., Holmes, P.: Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields, Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 42, 7 edn. Springer-Verlag, New York (2002)
Koella, J.C., Rieu, L., Paul, R.E.L.: Stage-specific manipulation of a mosquito’s host-seeking behavior by the malaria parasite Plasmodium gallinaceum. Behav. Ecol. 13(6), 816–820 (2002)
Koella, J.C., Sørensen, F.L., Anderson, R.A.: The malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum, increases the frequency of multiple feeding of its mosquito vector, Anopheles gambiae. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Biol. Sci. 265(1398), 763–768 (1998)
Lacroix, R., Mukabana, W.R., Gouagna, L.C., Koella, J.C.: Malaria infection increases attractiveness of humans to mosquitoes. PLOS Biol. 3(9), 1590–1593 (2005)
Molineaux, L., Shidrawi, G.R., Clarke, J.L., Boulzaguet, J.R., Ashkar, T.S.: Assessment of insecticidal impact on the malaria mosquito’s vectorial capacity, from data on the man-biting rate and age-composition. Bull. World Health Org. 57, 265–274 (1979)
Muir, D.A.: Anopheline mosquitoes: vector reproduction, life-cycle and biotope. In: W.H. Wernsdorfer, I. McGregor (eds.) Malaria: Principles and Practice of Malariology, vol. 1, chap. 15, pp. 431–451. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh (1988)
Ngwa, G.A., Shu, W.S.: A mathematical model for endemic malaria with variable human and mosquito populations. Math. Comput. Model. 32, 747–763 (2000)
Reiner, R.C., , Perkins, T.A., Barker, C.M., Niu, T., Chaves, L.F., Ellis, A.M., George, D.B., Le Menach, A., Pulliam, J.R.C., Bisanzio, D., Buckee, C., Chiyaka, C., Cummings, D.A.T., Garcia, A.J., Gatton, M.L., Gething, P.W., Hartley, D.M., Johnston, G., Klein, E.Y., Michael, E., Lindsay, S.W., Lloyd, A.L., Pigott, D.M., Reisen, W.K., Ruktanonchai, N., Singh, B.K., Tatem, A.J., Kitron, U., Hay, S.I., Scott, T.W., Smith, D.L.: A systematic review of mathematical models of mosquito-borne pathogen transmission: 1970–2010. J. R. Soc. Interface 10(81), 20120,921 (2013)
Ross, R.: Some quantitative studies in epidemiology. Nature 87(2188), 466–467 (1911)
Sama, W., Dietz, K., Smith, T.: Distribution of survival times of deliberate Plasmodium falciparum infections in tertiary syphilis patients. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 100(9), 811–816 (2006)
Smith, T., Maire, N., Ross, A., Penny, M., Chitnis, N., Schapira, A., Studer, A., Genton, B., Lengeler, C., Tediosi, F., de Savigny, D., Tanner, M.: Towards a comprehensive simulation model of malaria epidemiology and control. Parasitology 135, 1507–1516 (2008)
Vargas-De-León, C.: Global analysis of a delayed vector-bias model for malaria transmission with incubation period in mosquitoes. Math. Biosci. Eng. 9(1), 165–174 (2012)
Acknowledgments
H. A. thanks the financial support of the University Institute of Technology of Ngaoundere through the research mission in the year 2016. The work of B. B. has been partially supported by local grant 2015-2016 ‘Analysis of Complex Biological Systems’ and has been performed under the auspices of the Italian National Group for the Mathematical Physics (GNFM) of National Institute for Advanced Mathematics (INdAM). N. C. has been supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation through grant OPP1032350.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11587-017-0335-y.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Abboubakar, H., Buonomo, B. & Chitnis, N. Modelling the effects of malaria infection on mosquito biting behaviour and attractiveness of humans. Ricerche mat. 65, 329–346 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11587-016-0293-9
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11587-016-0293-9