Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reply to Williams

  • Short Response
  • Published:
Criminal Law and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In her review of my book Assisted Death: A Study in Ethics and Law, Glenys Williams raises a number of substantive objections to its argument. In this note I reply to those objections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. Glenys Williams, Intention and Causation in Medical Non-Killing: The Impact of Criminal law Concepts on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide (London and New York: Routledge-Cavendish, 2007), ch. 7.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Toronto, Canada

    L. W. Sumner

Authors
  1. L. W. Sumner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. W. Sumner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sumner, L.W. Reply to Williams. Criminal Law, Philosophy 9, 331–335 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-013-9264-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-013-9264-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation