Should the Late Stage Demented be Punished for Past Crimes?
- Annette DufnerAffiliated withCentre for Advanced Study in Bioethics, University of Muenster Email author
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The paper investigates whether it is plausible to hold the late stage demented criminally responsible for past actions. The concern is based on the fact that policy makers in the United States and in Britain are starting to wonder what to do with prison inmates in the later stages of dementia who do not remember their crimes anymore. The problem has to be expected to become more urgent as the population ages and the number of dementia patients increases. This paper argues that the late-stage demented should not be punished for past crimes. Applicable theories of punishment, especially theories with an appropriate expressivist, or communicative element, fail to justify the imprisonment of the late-stage demented. Further imprisonment would require a capacity for comprehension on the part of the punished, and, under certain narrowly specified conditions, even a capacity to be at least in principle capable of recalling the crime again.
KeywordsDementia Punishment Criminal responsibility Personal identity
- Should the Late Stage Demented be Punished for Past Crimes?
Criminal Law and Philosophy
Volume 7, Issue 1 , pp 137-150
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Criminal responsibility
- Personal identity
- Industry Sectors
- Annette Dufner (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Centre for Advanced Study in Bioethics, University of Muenster, Geiststr. 24-26, 48151, Muenster, Germany