Political Neutrality and Punishment
- Matt Matravers
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This paper is concerned with the tensions that arise when one juxtaposes one important liberal understanding of the nature and use of state power in circumstances of pluralism and (broadly) retributive accounts of punishment. The argument is that there are aspects of the liberal theory that seem to be in tension with aspects of retributive punishment, and that these tensions are difficult to avoid because of the attractiveness of precisely those features of each account. However, a proper understanding of both liberalism and retributive punishment allows us to dissolve some of the tensions whilst also bringing each position into sharper relief. The paper begins by introducing the liberal position and outlining the apparent tensions that may arise with retributive punishment. In so doing, there is also a brief discussion of how this debate relates to the more familiar dispute between legal moralists and their opponents. The paper then proceeds by considering each of the areas of tension in turn.
- Ashworth, A. (1999). Principles of criminal law (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press).
- Barry, B. (1995). Justice as impartiality: Volume 2 of a treatise on social justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Barry, B. (2001). Culture and equality: An egalitarian critique of multiculturalism. Cambridge: Polity.
- Brubaker, S. C. (1988). Can liberals punish? The American Political Science Review, 82(3), 821–836. CrossRef
- Caney, S. (1998). Impartiality and liberal neutrality. In P. Kelly (Ed.), Impartiality, neutrality and justice (pp. 87–107). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Duff, R. A. (2001). Punishment, communication, and community. Studies in crime and public policy. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
- Duff, R. A. (2007), Answering for crime: responsibility and liability in the criminal law. Legal Theory Today. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
- Duff, A. (2010a). Perversions and subversions of criminal law. In A. Duff, et al. (Eds.), The boundaries of the criminal law (pp. 88–112). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Duff, A., et al. (2010). The boundaries of the criminal law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Duff, A. (2012). Relational reasons and the criminal law. In L. Green & B. Leiter (Eds.), Oxford studies in philosophy of law (Vol. 2). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Feinberg, J. (1987). Some Unswept Debris from the Hart-Devlin debate. Synthese, 72(2), 249–275. CrossRef
- Feinberg, J. (1990). The moral limits of the criminal law, Volume 4: Harmless Wrongdoing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Hart, H. L. A. (1968). Punishment and responsibility: Essays in the philosophy of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Kymlicka, W. (1989). Liberal individualism and liberal neutrality. Ethics, 99, 883–905. CrossRef
- Matravers, M. (1998). ‘What’s “Wrong” in contractualism?’. In P. Kelly (ed.), Impartiality, neutrality and justice: Re-reading Brian Barry’s Justice as Impartiality (pp. 108–119). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Matravers, M. (1999). ‘“What to Say?”—the communicative element in punishment and moral theory’. Punishment and political theory (pp. 108–123). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
- Matravers, M. (2000). Justice and punishment: The rationale of coercion. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Matravers, M. (2011a). Political theory and the criminal law. In R. A. Duff & S. Green (Eds.), Philosophical foundations of the criminal law (pp. 67–82). New York: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Matravers, M. (2011b). Mad, bad, or faulty? Desert in distributive and retributive justice. In C. Knight & Z. Stemplowska (Eds.), Responsibility and distributive justice (pp. 136–151). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Matravers, M. (2011c). Is twenty-first century punishment post-desert? In M. Tonry (Ed.), Retributivism has a past: Has it a future?. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Matravers, M. Responsibility and the cultural defence. In W. Kymlicka, C. Lernested, & M. Matravers (Eds.), Cultural diversity and the criminal law. Oxford: Oxford University Press (forthcoming).
- Moore, M. (1997). Placing blame: A general theory of the criminal law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Murphy, J. (1995). Legal moralism and liberalism. Ariozona Law Review, 37, 73–93.
- Murphy, J. (2007). Legal moralism and retribution revisited. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 1(1), 5–20. CrossRef
- Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
- Rawls, J. (2005). Political liberalism: Expanded Edition. Columbia Classics in Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Ristroph, A. (2011). Third wave legal moralism. Arizona State Law Journal, 42, 1151–1172.
- Simester, A. P., & Sullivan, G. R. (2003). Criminal law: Theory and doctrine (2nd ed.). Oxford: Hart).
- Tadros, V. (2010). Criminalization and regulation. In A. Duff, et al. (Eds.), The boundaries of the criminal law (pp. 163–190). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Tadros, V. (2012). Wrongness and criminalization. In A. Marmor (Ed.), The Routledge companion to philosophy of law (pp. 157–173). London: Routledge.
- Political Neutrality and Punishment
Criminal Law and Philosophy
Volume 7, Issue 2 , pp 217-230
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Legal moralism
- Industry Sectors
- Matt Matravers (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Morrell Centre for Toleration, University of York, York, UK