Abstract
Abnormalities of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) provide effective evidence for impairment of the somatosensory system, so that SEPs have been widely used in both clinical diagnosis and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. However, due to their low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), SEPs are generally measured using ensemble averaging across hundreds of trials, thus unavoidably producing a tardiness of SEPs to the potential damages caused by surgical maneuvers and a loss of dynamical information of cortical processing related to somatosensory inputs. Here, we aimed to enhance the SNR of single-trial SEPs using Kalman filtering and time–frequency multiple linear regression (TF-MLR) and measure their single-trial parameters, both in the time domain and in the time–frequency domain. We first showed that, Kalman filtering and TF-MLR can effectively capture the single-trial SEP responses and provide accurate estimates of single-trial SEP parameters in the time domain and time–frequency domain, respectively. Furthermore, we identified significant correlations between the stimulus intensity and a set of indicative single-trial SEP parameters, including the correlation coefficient (between each single-trial SEPs and their average), P37 amplitude, N45 amplitude, P37-N45 amplitude, and phase value (at the zero-crossing points between P37 and N45). Finally, based on each indicative single-trial SEP parameter, we investigated the minimum number of trials required on a single-trial basis to suggest the existence of SEP responses, thus providing important information for fast SEP extraction in intraoperative monitoring.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aminoff MJ, Olney RK, Parry GJ, Raskin NH (1988) Relative utility of different electrophysiologic techniques in the evaluation of brachial plexopathies. Neurology 38:546–550
Arieli A, Sterkin A, Grinvald A, Aertsen A (1996) Dynamics of ongoing activity: explanation of the large variability in evoked cortical responses. Science 273:1868–1871
Cerutti S, Chiarenza G, Liberati D, Mascellani P, Pavesi G (1988) A parametric method of identification of single-trial event-related potentials in the brain. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 35:701–711
Cruccu G, Aminoff MJ, Curio G, Guerit JM, Kakigi R, Mauguiere F, Rossini PM, Treede RD, Garcia-Larrea L (2008) Recommendations for the clinical use of somatosensory-evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 119:1705–1719
Cui H, Wang Y, Li X, Xie X, Xu S, Hu Y (2015) Trial-to-trial latency variability of somatosensory evoked potentials as a prognostic indicator for surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neuroeng Rehabil 12:49
Daly I, Nasuto SJ, Warwick K (2011) Single tap identification for fast BCI control. Cogn Neurodyn 5:21–30
Dawson GD (1951) A summation technique for detecting small signals in a large irregular background. J Physiol 115:2p–3p
Dawson GD (1954) A summation technique for the detection of small evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 6:65–84
Debener S, Strobel A, Sorger B, Peters J, Kranczioch C, Engel AK, Goebel R (2007) Improved quality of auditory event-related potentials recorded simultaneously with 3-T fMRI: removal of the ballistocardiogram artefact. Neuroimage 34:587–597
Deletis V, Shils JL (2002) Neurophysiology in neurosurgery: a modern intraoperative approach. Academic Press, San Diego
Delorme A, Makeig S (2004) EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 134:9–21
Devlin VJ, Anderson PA, Schwartz DM, Vaughan R (2006) Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring: focus on cervical myelopathy and related issues. Spine J 6:212S–224S
Friman O, Borga M, Lundberg P, Knutsson H (2003) Adaptive analysis of fMRI data. Neuroimage 19:837–845
Friston KJ, Fletcher P, Josephs O, Holmes A, Rugg MD, Turner R (1998) Event-related fMRI: characterizing differential responses. Neuroimage 7:30–40
Hu Y, Luk KD, Lu WW, Holmes A, Leong JC (2001a) Comparison of time-frequency distribution techniques for analysis of spinal somatosensory evoked potential. Med Biol Eng Comput 39:375–380
Hu Y, Luk KD, Wong YW, Lu WW, Leong JC (2001b) Effect of stimulation parameters on intraoperative spinal cord evoked potential monitoring. J Spinal Disord 14:449–452
Hu Y, Luk KD, Lu WW, Leong JC (2002) Comparison of time-frequency analysis techniques in intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) monitoring. Comput Biol Med 32:13–23
Hu Y, Luk KD, Lu WW, Leong JC (2003) Application of time-frequency analysis to somatosensory evoked potential for intraoperative spinal cord monitoring. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74:82–87
Hu Y, Lam BS, Chang CQ, Chan FH, Lu WW, Luk KD (2005) Adaptive signal enhancement of somatosensory evoked potential for spinal cord compression detection: an experimental study. Comput Biol Med 35:814–828
Hu L, Mouraux A, Hu Y, Iannetti GD (2010a) A novel approach for enhancing the signal-to-noise ratio and detecting automatically event-related potentials (ERPs) in single trials. Neuroimage 50:99–111
Hu Y, Liu H, Luk KD (2010b) Signal-to-noise ratio of intraoperative tibial nerve somatosensory-evoked potentials. J Clin Neurophysiol 27:30–33
Hu L, Xiao P, Zhang ZG, Mouraux A, Iannetti GD (2014) Single-trial time-frequency analysis of electrocortical signals: baseline correction and beyond. Neuroimage 84:876–887. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.055
Hu L, Zhang ZG, Mouraux A, Iannetti GD (2015) Multiple linear regression to estimate time-frequency electrophysiological responses in single trials. Neuroimage 111:442–453. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.062
Huang G, Liu G, Meng J, Zhang D, Zhu X (2010) Model based generalization analysis of common spatial pattern in brain computer interfaces. Cogn Neurodyn 4:217–223
Huang G, Xiao P, Hung YS, Zhang ZG, Hu L (2013) A novel approach to predict subjective pain perception from single-trial laser-evoked potentials. Neuroimage 81C:283–293
Iannetti GD, Zambreanu L, Wise RG, Buchanan TJ, Huggins JP, Smart TS, Vennart W, Tracey I (2005) Pharmacological modulation of pain-related brain activity during normal and central sensitization states in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:18195–18200
Iannetti GD, Hughes NP, Lee MC, Mouraux A (2008) Determinants of laser-evoked EEG responses: pain perception or stimulus saliency? J Neurophysiol 100:815–828
Jung TP, Makeig S, Westerfield M, Townsend J, Courchesne E, Sejnowski TJ (2001) Analysis and visualization of single-trial event-related potentials. Hum Brain Mapp 14:166–185
Lam BS, Hu Y, Lu WW, Luk KD, Chang CQ, Qiu W, Chan FH (2005) Multi-adaptive filtering technique for surface somatosensory evoked potentials processing. Med Eng Phys 27:257–266
Li JL, Cui H, Chang C, Hu Y (2014) A robotic rehabilitation arm driven by somatosensory brain–computer interface. Int J Med Health Pharm Biomed Eng 8:294–297
Luk KD, Hu Y, Wong YW, Leong JC (1999) Variability of somatosensory-evoked potentials in different stages of scoliosis surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:1799–1804
Luk KD, Hu Y, Lu WW, Wong YW (2001) Effect of stimulus pulse duration on intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) monitoring. J Spinal Disord 14:247–251
Marple SL (1987) Digital spectral analysis: with applications. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Mayhew SD, Iannetti GD, Woolrich MW, Wise RG (2006) Automated single-trial measurement of amplitude and latency of laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) using multiple linear regression. Clin Neurophysiol 117:1331–1344
Mayhew SD, Dirckx SG, Niazy RK, Iannetti GD, Wise RG (2010) EEG signatures of auditory activity correlate with simultaneously recorded fMRI responses in humans. Neuroimage 49:849–864
Minahan RE (2002) Intraoperative neuromonitoring. Neurologist 8:209–226
Mitsis GD, Iannetti GD, Smart TS, Tracey I, Wise RG (2008) Regions of interest analysis in pharmacological fMRI: how do the definition criteria influence the inferred result? Neuroimage 40:121–132
Mouraux A, Iannetti GD (2008) Across-trial averaging of event-related EEG responses and beyond. Magn Reson Imaging 26:1041–1054
Mouraux A, Guerit JM, Plaghki L (2003) Non-phase locked electroencephalogram (EEG) responses to CO2 laser skin stimulations may reflect central interactions between A partial differential- and C-fibre afferent volleys. Clin Neurophysiol 114:710–722
Neumaier A, Schneider T (2001) Estimation of parameters and eigenmodes of multivariate autoregressive models. ACM Trans Math Softw 27:27–57
Nishida S, Nakamura M, Shibasaki H (1993) Method for single-trial recording of somatosensory evoked potentials. J Biomed Eng 15:257–262
Nuwer MR (1998) Spinal cord monitoring with somatosensory techniques. J Clin Neurophysiol 15:183–193
Nuwer MR, Lehmann D, Da Silva FL, Matsuoka S, Sutherling W, Vibert JF (1999) IFCN guidelines for topographic and frequency analysis of EEGs and EPs.The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 52:15–20
Pfurtscheller G, Lopes Da Silva FH (1999) Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles. Clin Neurophysiol 110:1842–1857
Pockett S, Whalen S, Mcphail AV, Freeman WJ (2007) Topography, independent component analysis and dipole source analysis of movement related potentials. Cogn Neurodyn 1:327–340
Rossi L, Bianchi AM, Merzagora A, Gaggiani A, Cerutti S, Bracchi F (2007) Single trial somatosensory evoked potential extraction with ARX filtering for a combined spinal cord intraoperative neuromonitoring technique. Biomed Eng Online 6:2
Schlogl A (2006) A comparison of multivariate autoregressive estimators. Signal Process 86:2426–2429
Schneider T, Neumaier A (2001) Algorithm 808: ARfit—A matlab package for the estimation of parameters and eigenmodes of multivariate autoregressive models. ACM Trans Math Softw 27:58–65
Schwarz G (1978) Estimating dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6:461–464
Spencer KM (2005) Averaging, detection, and classification of single-trial ERPs. In: Handy TC (ed) Event-related potentials : a methods handbook. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 209–227
Stark HG (1992) Continuous wavelet transform and continuous multiscale analysis. J Math Anal Appl 169:179–196
Tang AC, Sutherland MT, Mckinney CJ (2005) Validation of SOBI components from high-density EEG. Neuroimage 25:539–553
Tognola G, Grandori F, Ravazzani P (1998) Wavelet analysis of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 45:686–697
Treede RD (2007) Das somatosensorische system. In: Schmidt RF, Lang F (eds) Physiologie des menschen, 30th edn. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 297–323
Von Spreckelsen M, Bromm B (1988) Estimation of single-evoked cerebral potentials by means of parametric modeling and Kalman filtering. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 35:691–700
Wang C, Zou J, Zhang J, Wang M, Wang R (2010) Feature extraction and recognition of epileptiform activity in EEG by combining PCA with ApEn. Cogn Neurodyn 4:233–240
Wiedemayer H, Fauser B, Sandalcioglu IE, Schafer H, Stolke D (2002) The impact of neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring on surgical decisions: a critical analysis of 423 cases. J Neurosurg 96:255–262
Yiannikas C, Vucic S (2008) Utility of somatosensory evoked potentials in chronic acquired demyelinating neuropathy. Muscle Nerve 38:1447–1454
Zeman BD, Yiannikas C (1989) Functional prognosis in stroke: use of somatosensory evoked potentials. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 52:242–247
Zhang ZG, Yang JL, Chan SC, Luk KD, Hu Y (2009) Time-frequency component analysis of somatosensory evoked potentials in rats. Biomed Eng Online 8:4
Zhang ZG, Luk KD, Hu Y (2010) Identification of detailed time–frequency components in somatosensory evoked potentials. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 18:10
Zhao Q, Rutkowski TM, Zhang L, Cichocki A (2010) Generalized optimal spatial filtering using a kernel approach with application to EEG classification. Cogn Neurodyn 4:355–358
Acknowledgments
LH is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31200856, 31471082) and New Teacher Fund of Ministry of Education of China (20120182120002). HTL, KDL, and YH were supported by a Grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong (767511M) and NSFC (81271685). ZGZ was supported by a Grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong (785913M).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hu, L., Zhang, Z.G., Liu, H.T. et al. Single-trial detection for intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials monitoring. Cogn Neurodyn 9, 589–601 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-015-9348-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-015-9348-y