NanoEthics

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 31–42

Self-Assembly, Self-Organization: Nanotechnology and Vitalism

Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s11569-009-0056-0

Cite this article as:
Bensaude-Vincent, B. Nanoethics (2009) 3: 31. doi:10.1007/s11569-009-0056-0

Abstract

Over the past decades, self-assembly has attracted a lot of research attention and transformed the relations between chemistry, materials science and biology. The paper explores the impact of the current interest in self-assembly techniques on the traditional debate over the nature of life. The first section describes three different research programs of self-assembly in nanotechnology in order to characterize their metaphysical implications: (1) Hybridization (using the building blocks of living systems for making devices and machines) ; (2) Biomimetics (making artifacts mimicking nature); (3) Integration (a composite of the two previous strategies). The second section focused on the elusive boundary between self-assembly and self-organization tries to map out the various positions adopted by the promoters of self-assembly on the issue of vitalism.

Keywords

BiomimeticsHybridizationBionanotechnologyNature and artifactChemistryBiologyCybernetics

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université Paris OuestNanterreFrance