External sources of clean technology: Evidence from the Clean Development Mechanism
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
New technology is fundamental to sustainable development. However, inventors from industrialized countries often refuse technology transfer because they worry about reverse-engineering. When can clean technology transfer succeed? We develop a formal model of the political economy of North–South technology transfer. According to the model, technology transfer is possible if (1) the technology in focus has limited global commercial potential or (2) the host developing country does not have the capacity to absorb new technologies for commercial use. If both conditions fail, inventors from industrialized countries worry about the adverse competitiveness effects of reverse-engineering, so technology transfer fails. Data analysis of technology transfer in 4,894 projects implemented under the Kyoto Protocol’s Clean Development Mechanism during the 2004–2010 period provides evidence in support of the model.
- Ai, C., & Norton, E.C. (2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters, 80(1), 123–129. CrossRef
- Beck, N., Katz, J.N., Tucker, R. (1998). Taking time seriously: time-series-cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science, 42(4), 1260–1288. CrossRef
- Berry, W.D., DeMeritt, J.H.R., Esarey, J. (2010). Testing for interaction in binary logit and probit models: is a product term essential? American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 248–266. CrossRef
- Brambor, T., Clark, W.R., Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 14(1), 63–82. CrossRef
- Brewer, T.L. (2008). Climate change technology transfer: a new paradigm and policy agenda. Climate Policy, 8(5), 516–526. CrossRef
- Carter, D.B., & Signorino, C.S. (2010). Back to the future: modeling time dependence in binary data. Political Analysis, 18(3), 271–292. CrossRef
- Chamberlain, G. (1980). Analysis of covariance with qualitative data. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 225–238. CrossRef
- Cheibub, J.A., Gandhi, J., Vreeland, J.R. (2010). Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice, 143(1–2), 67–101. CrossRef
- Dechezleprêtre, A., Glachant, M., Ménière, Y. (2008). The Clean Development Mechanism and the international diffusion of technologies: an empirical study. Energy Policy, 36(4), 1273–1283. CrossRef
- Gallagher, K.S. (2006). Limits to leapfrogging in energy technologies? Evidence from the Chinese automobile industry. Energy Policy, 34(4), 383–394. CrossRef
- Goenner, C.F. (2010). From toys to warships: interdependence and the effects of disaggregated trade on militarized disputes. Journal of Peace Research, 47(5), 547–559. CrossRef
- Grossman, G.M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and growth in the global economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Hendrix, C.S. (2010). Measuring state capacity: theoretical and empirical implications for the study of civil conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 47(3), 273–285. CrossRef
- Hoekman, B.M., Maskus, K.E., Saggi, K. (2005). Transfer of technology to developing countries: unilateral and multilateral policy options. World Development, 33(10), 1587–1602. CrossRef
- Iacus, S.M., King, G., Porro, G. (2012). Causal inference without balance checking: coarsened exact matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1–24. CrossRef
- Keller, W. (1996). Absorptive capacity: on the creation and acquisition of technology in development. Journal of Development Economics, 49(1), 199–227. CrossRef
- Keller, W. (2004). International technology diffusion. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(3), 752–782. CrossRef
- Lewis, J.I. (2007). Technology acquisition and innovation in the developing world: wind turbine development in China and India. Studies in Comparative International Development, 42(3–4), 208–232. CrossRef
- Lewis, J.I., & Wiser, R.H. (2007). Fostering a renewable energy technology industry: an international comparison of wind industry policy support mechanisms. Energy Policy, 35(3), 1844–1857. CrossRef
- Lütken, S.E., & Michaelowa, A. (2008). Corporate strategies and the Clean Development Mechanism: Developing country financing for developed country commitments? Northampton: Edward Elgar.
- Mani, M., & Wheeler, D. (1998). In search of pollution havens? Dirty industry in the World economy, 1960–1995. Journal of Environment and Development, 7(3), 215–247. CrossRef
- Maskus, K.E. (2000). Intellectual property rights in the global economy. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
- Michaelowa, A. (2007). Unilateral CDM: can developing countries finance generation of greenhouse gas emission credits on their own? International Environmental Agreements, 7(1), 17–34. CrossRef
- Ockwell, D.G., Haum, R., Mallett, A., Watson, J. (2010). Intellectual property rights and low carbon technology transfer: conflicting discourses of diffusion and development. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 729–739. CrossRef
- Park, W.G. (2008). International patent protection: 1960–2005. Research Policy, 37(4), 761–766. CrossRef
- Perkins, R, & Neumayer, E. (2009). Transnational linkages and the spillover of environment-efficiency into developing countries. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 375–383. CrossRef
- Popp, D. (2011). International technology transfer, climate change, and the Clean Development Mechanism. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 5(1), 131–152. CrossRef
- REN21 (2011). Renewables global status report: 2011 update. Paris: REN21 Secretariat.
- Ringquist, E.J., & Kostadinova, T. (2005). Assessing the effectiveness of international environmental agreements: the case of the 1985 Helsinki protocol. American Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 86–102. CrossRef
- Saggi, K. (2002). Trade, foreign direct investment, and international technology transfer: a survey. World Bank Research Observer, 17(2), 191–235. CrossRef
- Schneider, M, Holzer, A., Hoffmann, V.H. (2008). Understanding the CDM’s contribution to technology transfer. Energy Policy, 36(8), 2930–2938. CrossRef
- UNFCCC (2010). The contribution of the Clean Development Mechanism under the Kyoto protocol. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
- Wara, M.W., & Victor, D.G. (2008). A realistic policy on international carbon offsets. Stanford University, Program on Energy and Sustainable Development, Working Paper 74.
- Ward, H. (2006). International linkages and international sustainability: the effects of the regime network. Journal of Peace Research, 43(2), 149–166. CrossRef
- External sources of clean technology: Evidence from the Clean Development Mechanism
The Review of International Organizations
Volume 8, Issue 1 , pp 81-109
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Technology transfer
- Political economy
- Clean Development Mechanism
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Graduate School of Economic and Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, D7, 27, 68131, Mannheim, Germany
- 2. Department of Political Science, Columbia University, 420 West 118th Street, 712 International Affairs Building, New York, NY, 10027, USA