Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Global governance behind closed doors: The IMF boardroom, the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility, and the intersection of material power and norm stabilisation in global politics

  • Published:
The Review of International Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Up on the 12th floor of its 19th Street Headquarters, the IMF Board sits in active session for an average of 7 hours per week. Although key matters of policy are decided on in the venue, the rules governing Boardroom interactions remain opaque, resting on an uneasy combination of consensual decision-making and weighted voting. Through a detailed analysis of IMF Board discussions surrounding the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility (ESAF), this article sheds light on the mechanics of power in this often overlooked venue of global economic governance. By exploring the key issues of default liability and loan conditionality, I demonstrate that whilst the Boardroom is a more active site of contestation than has hitherto been recognized, material power is a prime determinant of both Executive Directors’ preferences and outcomes reached from discussions. And as the decisions reached form the backbone of the ‘instruction sheet’ used by Fund staff to guide their everyday operational decisions, these outcomes—and the processes through which they were reached—were factors of primary importance in stabilizing the operational norms at the heart of a controversial phase in the contemporary history of IMF concessional lending.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Following a recent change to the Fund’s disclosure policy, this embargo time has been reduced to five years. On the broader ‘transparency drive’ at the Fund, see Weaver (2010).

  2. In the most recent ‘official history’ of the Fund, James Boughton (2001: 1031–3) provides only a general account of how a combination of ex ante canvassing and ‘scorekeeping’ during Executive Board Meetings of Directors’ positions by the Secretary serve to enable the institution to function without regular recourse to formal votes.

  3. Pre-launch discussions of the form and function of ESAF took place in late 1987, and in 1999 the concessional lending window was transformed into the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility.

  4. Access to the full collection of these documents is available through the on-site IMF Archives.

  5. In this article I side-step the epistemological issues raised over the commensurability of the rationalist and constructivist models (e.g., Weiner 2003; Johnson 2002), and follow the approach advocated by Jeffrey Checkel of engaging in ‘middle range theory building’ (Checkel and Moravcsik 2001: 243).

  6. Prior actions are a form of conditionality that must be implemented before the IMF Board approves financing or undertakes a review; structural performance criteria are policy reforms whose implementation is required to ensure continued disbursal of program loans (see IMF IEO 2002: 44–7).

  7. Quoted in Jupille et al. (2003: 11).

  8. Grobe (2010) provides a detailed analysis of competing conceptualizations of the truth seeking characteristics of agents within constructivist scholarship.

  9. With the fate of several billion SDRs-worth of loans at stake, and discussions taking place amongst overtly political actors, ESAF discussions provide a ‘hard case’ for the constructivist approach. Existing analyses have suggested that ‘domains of application’ conditions that push actors towards rationalist rather than constructivist ideal-type behavior include high financial stakes (March and Olsen 1998: 958), the involvement of political rather than technocratic actors (Jupille et al. 2003: 21–2), and a lack of causal knowledge about which of the available options constitutes the most effective policy choice (Grobe 2010). Each of these conditions appears to have been met in the case of Executive Board discussions of ESAF, with the mechanisms surrounding the distribution of several billion SDRs-worth of loans being debated by politically-appointed actors who made repeated complaints about the quality of guidance provided by IMF staffs about how to negotiate the options available (e.g., IMF 1993a: 22; IMF 1993a: 40; IMF 1998a: 4).

  10. I borrow Seabrooke’s (2007b: 372) first-cut definition of ‘economic constructivism’.

  11. See IMF (2007).

  12. This mechanism is akin to the ‘soft economic law’ outlined by the former General Counsel of the IMF, Joseph Gold (1983a: 443).

  13. Coding is a technique developed to facilitate the quantitative analysis of interview transcripts, which is increasingly being transferred to assist the analysis of official documents. For further information on the method, see Auerbach and Siverstein (2003). It is through the innovative work of Lou Cabrera and Amin Samman, former colleagues at the University of Birmingham, that I was first introduced to the technique. See Cabrera (2010), and Samman (2011).

  14. In total, approximately 800 pages of minutes were analyzed, containing some 37,000 lines of text. The discussions took place within 16 meetings, which were clustered around the period immediately preceding the launch of ESAF in late 1987, the 5-year review of ESAF operations in 1993, and the 10-year internal and external reviews in late 1997 and early 1998 respectively.

  15. Table 1 provides a snapshot of quotas in 1987, and does not account for subsequent reforms in 1993 and 1997. In addition, in order to generate comparable longitudinal data, the new members admitted in 1992 are excluded from analysis.

  16. See IMF Official Website, at http://www.imf.org/external/about/govstruct.htm. Accessed 22/09/10.

  17. The ratio in 1946 was approximately 2:1, but by 2010 had rocketed to almost 10:1. The largest constituencies in recent years have been the two main Africa groups, in which over 20 states are represented.

  18. IMF Articles of Agreement: Article XII, Section 5, Paragraph (c). See IMF Official Website, available at http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/aa/aa12.htm#3. Accessed 15/09/10.

  19. For a detailed commentary on the evolution of the Fund’s concessional lending, see Boughton (2001: 637–704).

  20. Quoted by Boughton (2001: 663).

  21. It should be noted that, as Executive Directors change on average every 4 years, these findings on preference stability relate to the office rather than individuals per se. The existence of stable preferences in the face of changing individuals raises questions over the agency enjoyed by Directors, and broadly these findings reflect Momani’s (2010a) suggestion that Executive Directors commonly enjoy relatively low levels of ‘room for manoeuvre’.

  22. The Managing Director’s Summing Up serves to record the ‘mood of the meeting’ or ‘points of agreement’ reached at the conclusion of the Board’s formal discussions. This statement provides guidance to staff on key operational matters, and in many cases holds the same legal force as a formal decision (see Chelsky 2009: 209–12).

  23. For an overview of the evolution of this norm in the sovereign debt regime, see Broome (2009) and Barry and Tomitova (2007).

  24. Indeed in 2005, almost three decades after the 1978 Amendments restricted the use of gold at the IMF, the Fund held the third largest gold reserve in the world (Kapoor 2005).

  25. A good illustrative example comes from the contribution of the Italian Director, who simply suggests that ‘In paragraph 2 of the decision establishing the Trust, reference should be made to the possibility of using or mobilising the Fund’s gold to protect creditors’ claims’ (IMF 1987b: 42).

  26. According to their interpretation, gold sales would have to flow into the Fund’s general lending resources, and as such could not be channelled back to individual states on the basis of contributions to the ESAF Trust.

  27. For detailed overviews of the role of NGOs in the extension of multilateral debt relief, see Broome (2009) and Busby (2007).

  28. As Meltzer (2011) has recently argued, with the Fund’s current burst in lending activity the relationship between its resources and sovereign default could over the medium term again become a key issue in the global economy.

  29. Interestingly, Felgenhauer appears to raise the same procedural to the use of gold sales for this purpose as LMP Directors, regarding the operational restrictions placed on the use of gold at the Fund.

  30. This was done most forcefully by the Iranian Director, with his injunction that ‘I… insist on having any change in our operations based on a formal decision on changing the guidelines on conditionality—a decision which should be duly approved by the Executive Board, rather than reflecting the first reactions of two or three Executive Directors’ (IMF 1987c: p.32).

  31. See Momani (2010a: 166).

References

  • Auerbach, C., & Siverstein, L. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, A. (2006). The group of seven: Finance ministries, central banks and global financial governance. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the world: International organizations in global politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R., & Lee, J. (2005). IMF Programs: who are chosen and what are the effects? Journal of Monetary Economics, 52(7), 1245–1269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, C., & Tomitova, L. (2007). Fairness in sovereign debt. Ethics and International Affairs, 21(1), 41–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, G. (1995). IMF lending to developing countries: Issues and evidence. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boughton, J. (2001). The silent revolution: Global finance and development in the 1980s. Washington: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S. (1990). Negotiation games: Applying game theory to bargaining and arbitration. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Broome, A. (2008). The important of being earnest: the IMF as a reputational intermediary. New Political Economy, 13(2), 125–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broome, A. (2009). When do NGOs matter? Activist organizations as a source of change in the international debt regime. Global Society, 23(1), 59–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broome, A., & Seabrooke, L. (2007). Seeing like the IMF: institutional change in small open economies. Review of International Political Economy, 14(4), 576–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busby, J. (2007). Bono made Jesse Helms cry: Jubilee 2000, debt relief, and moral action in international politics. International Studies Quarterly, 51(2), 247–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, L. (2010). The practice of global citizenship. Cambridge: University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo-Gonzalez, O. (2007). Ownership and conditionality in IMF programs: back to Per Jacobsen’s time. Review of International Organizations, 2(2), 329–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. (2003). behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkel, J. (2001). Why comply? Social learning and European identity change. International Organization, 55(3), 553–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkel, J., & Moravcsik, A. (2001). A constructivist research program in EU studies? European Union Politics, 2(2), 219–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chelsky, J. (2009). Summarizing the views of the IMF board. In R. Lamdany & D. Martinez-Diaz (Eds.), Studies of IMF governance: A compendium (pp. 208–228). Washington: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chweiroth, J. (2008). Organizational change from within: exploring the World Bank’s early lending practices. Review of International Political Economy, 15(4), 481–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chweiroth, J. (2010). Capital ideas: The IMF and the rise of financial liberalization. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, L. (2010a). In the loop: multilevel feedback and the politics of change at the World Bank and IMF. Journal of International Relations and Development, 13(1), 59–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, L. (2010b). Our dream is a world full of poverty indicators: the US, the World Bank, and the power of numbers. New Political Economy, 15(4), 473–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, P. (1994). IMF lending programs: participation and impact. Journal of Development Economics, 45(2), 365–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copelovitch, M. (2010). The International Monetary Fund in the global economy: Banks, Bonds, and Bailouts. Cambridge: University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dreher, A. (2009). IMF conditionality: theory and evidence. Public Choice, 141(2), 233–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1982). Marxism, functionalism and game theory: the case for methodological individualism. Theory and Society, 11(4), 453–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1989). Nuts and bolts for the social sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fearon, J. (1998). Bargaining, enforcement, and international cooperation. International Organization, 52(2), 269–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felgenhauer, G. (2000). IMF off-market gold sales: questions of law and moral hazard. Columbia Journal of International Law, 39(1), 221–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, J., & Martin, L. (2003). International political economy: Global and domestic interactions. In I. Katznelson & H. Milner (Eds.), Political science: The state of the discipline (pp. 118–146). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, J. (1983a). Political considerations are prohibited by articles of agreement when the fund considers requests for use of resources. IMF Survey, 12(10), 146–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, J. (1983b). Strengthening the soft international law of exchange arrangements. American Journal of International Law, 77(3), 443–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grobe, C. (2010). The power of words: argumentative persuasion in international negotiations. European Journal of International Relations, 16(1), 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, B., Rahman, J., & Wodon, Q. (2008). Robbing Peter to pay Paul? Understanding who pays for debt relief. World Development, 36(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutner, T. (2002). Banking on the environment: Multilateral development banks and their performance in Eastern Europe. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, S. (1985). The politics of adjustment: lessons from the IMF’s extended fund facility. International Organization, 39(3), 505–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, D., et al. (2006). Delegation under anarchy: States, international organizations, and principal-agent theory. In Hawkins et al. (Eds.), Delegation and agency in international organizations (pp. 3–38). Cambridge: University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • IMF (1987a). Executive Board Meeting Informal Session, November 13th (am). Washington: IMF, Archive Reference EBMIS/87/5.

  • IMF (1987b). Executive Board Meeting Informal Session, November 13th (pm). Washington: IMF, Archive Reference EBMIS/87/6.

  • IMF (1987c). Executive Board Meeting Informal Session, November 20th (am). Washington: IMF, Archive Reference EBMIS/87/7.

  • IMF (1987d). Executive Board Meeting Informal Session, November 20th (pm). Washington: IMF, Archive Reference EBMIS/87/8.

  • IMF (1987e). Executive Board Meeting, December 11th (am). Washington: IMF, Archive Reference EBM/87/168.

  • IMF (1987f). Executive Board Meeting, December 15th (am). Washington: IMF, Archive Reference EBM/87/171.

  • IMF (1987g). Executive Board Meeting, December 18th (am). Washington: IMF, Archive Reference EBM/87/175.

  • IMF (1993a). Executive Board Meeting, March 12th (am). Washington: IMF, Archive Reference EBM/93/33.

  • IMF (1993b). Executive Board Meeting, March 12th (pm). Washington: IMF, Archive Reference EBM/93/34.

  • IMF (1993c). Executive Board Meeting, December 15th (am). Washington: IMF, Archive Reference EBM/93/170.

  • IMF (1997). Executive Board Meeting, July 18th (am). Washington: IMF, Archive Reference EBM/97/74.

  • IMF (1998a). Executive Board Meeting, March 11th (am). Washington: IMF, Archive Reference EBM/98/25.

  • IMF (1998b). Executive Board Meeting, March 12th (pm). Washington: IMF, Archive Reference EBM/98/26.

  • IMF (1998c). Executive Board Meeting, July 8th (am). Washington: IMF, Archive Reference EBM/98/73.

  • IMF. (2007). Selected decisions and selected documents of the International Monetary Fund: Thirty-second issue. Washington: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF Independent Evaluation Office. (2002). Evaluation of the prolonged use of fund resources. Washington: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, H. (1996). International monetary cooperation after Bretton Woods. Washington: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. (2002). How conceptual problems migrate: rational choice, interpretation, and the hazard of pluralism. Annual Review of Political Science, 5(1), 223–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, J. (2004). Adoption, implementation, and impact of IMF programs: a review of the issues and evidence. Comparative Economic Studies, 46(3), 451–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jupille, J., Caporaso, J., & Checkel, J. (2003). Integrating institutions: rationalism, constructivism, and the study of the European union. Comparative Political Studies, 36(1), 7–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, S. (2005). Mobilizing gold for IMF debt cancellaton. Development, 48(1), 92–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassim, H., & Menon, A. (2003). The principal-agent approach and the study of the European union: promise unfulfilled? Journal of European Public Policy, 10(1), 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. (1998). International institutions: two approaches. International Studies Quarterly, 32(4), 379–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killick, T. (1995). IMF programs in developing countries: Design and impact. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kolko, G. (1999). Ravaging the poor: the International Monetary Fund indicated by its own data. International Journal of Health Services, 29(1), 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S. (1982). Structural causes and regime consequences. International Organization, 36(2), 185–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lake, D., & McCubbins, M. (2006). The logic of delegation to international organizations. In D. Hawkins et al. (Eds.), Delegation and agency in international organizations (pp. 341–368). Cambridge: University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lipson, C. (1986). Bankers’ dilemmas: Private cooperation in restructuring sovereign debts. In K. Oye (Ed.), Cooperation under anarchy (pp. 200–225). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J., & Olsen, J. (1998). The institutional dynamics of international political orders. International Organization, 52(4), 943–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer, A. (2011). The IMF Returns. Review of International Organizations, 6(3–4), 443–452.

  • Momani, B. (2007). IMF staff: missing link in fund reform proposals. Review of International Organizations, 2(1), 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Momani, B. (2010a). Canada’s IMF executive director. Canadian Public Administration, 53(2), 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Momani, B. (2010b). Internal or external norm champions: The IMF and multilateral debt relief. In S. Park & A. Vetterlein (Eds.), Owning development: Creating policy norms in the IMF and World Bank (pp. 29–47). Cambridge: University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (1993). Preferences and power in the European community: a liberal intergovernmentalist approach. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(4), 473–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielson, D., Tierney, M., & Weaver, C. (2006). Bridging the rationalist-constructivist divide: re-engineering the culture of the World Bank. Journal of International Relations and Development, 9(1), 107–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oye, K. (1986). Explaining cooperation under anarchy. In K. Oye (Ed.), Cooperation under anarchy (pp. 1–24). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., & Vetterlein, A. (2010). Introduction: Owning development. In S. Park & A. Vetterlein (Eds.), Owning development: Creating policy norms at the IMF and World Bank (pp. 3–25). Cambridge: University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T. (2000). ‘Lets argue!’: communicative action in world politics. International Organization, 54(1), 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T., & Sikkink, K. (1999). The socialization of international human rights norms into domestic practices. In T. Risse, S. Ropp, & K. Sikkink (Eds.), The power of human rights: International norms and domestic change (pp. 1–38). Cambridge: University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Samman, A. (2011). Making financial history: The global financial press and the return of the past, 2007–2009. Paper Presented at the International Studies Association Annual Conference, Montreal, March 16–19.

  • Schelling, T. (1963). The strategy of conflict. Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F. (2000). International socialization in the New Europe: rational action in an institutionalized environment. European Journal of International Relations, 6(1), 109–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seabrooke, L. (2007a). Legitimacy gaps in the world economy: explaining the sources of the IMF’s legitimacy crisis. International Politics, 44(2), 250–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seabrooke, L. (2007b). Varieties of economic constructivism: uncertain times call for disparate measures. Review of International Political Economy, 14(2), 371–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinwand, M., & Stone, R. (2008). The IMF: a review of recent evidence. Review of International Organizations, 3(2), 123–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, R. (2011). Controlling institutions: International organizations and the global economy. Cambridge: University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tsingou, E. (2010). Global financial governance and the developing anti-money laundering regime: what lessons for international political economy? International Politics, 47(5), 617–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vetterlein, A. (2006). Change in international organizations: Innovation or adaptation? A comparison of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. In D. Stone & C. Wright (Eds.), The World Bank and governance: A decade of reform and reaction (pp. 125–144). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vreeland, J. (2003). The IMF and economic development. Cambridge: University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vreeland, J. (2006). IMF policy compliance: aggregate index versus policy specific research strategies. Review of International Organizations, 1(2), 359–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, C. (2007). The World’s bank and the bank’s world. Global Governance, 13(4), 493–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, C. (2008). Hypocrisy trap: The poverty of reform at the World Bank. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, C. (2010). The politics of performance evaluation: independent evaluation at the International Monetary Fund. Review of International Organizations, 5(3), 365–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, C., & Park, S. (2007). The role of the World Bank in poverty alleviation and human development in the twenty-first century. Global Governance, 13(4), 461–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, A. (2003). Constructivism: the limits of bridging gaps. Journal of International Relations and Development, 6(3), 252–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, N., & Lombardi, D. (2006). Uneven patterns of governance: how developing countries are represented in the IMF. Review of International Political Economy, 13(3), 480–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liam Clegg.

Additional information

The article draws on research undertaken at the IMF Archives whilst working as a Visiting Scholar at the American Political Science Association Centennial Centre, Washington DC, in June 2010. I owe particular thanks to Dorota Wyganowska and Premela Isaacs of the IMF Archives, and to Alison Desrosiers of APSA. I also acknowledge the support provided by the UK Economic and Social Research Council (PTA-026-27-2807).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clegg, L. Global governance behind closed doors: The IMF boardroom, the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility, and the intersection of material power and norm stabilisation in global politics. Rev Int Organ 7, 285–308 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-011-9133-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-011-9133-6

Keywords

JEL Codes

Navigation