Skip to main content
Log in

Boletus mendax, a new species of Boletus sect. Luridi from Italy and insights on the B. luridus complex

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mycological Progress Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The new species Boletus mendax of sect. Luridi is reported and discussed; its morphological, anatomical and edaphic characters are described and a molecular investigation is carried out in order to elucidate the separation from neighboring taxa. The present research also demonstrates the high degree of segregation of two collections of the recently described Boletus comptus and the low taxonomic value of the usual reddish pigmentation of the subhymenophoral layer (the so called Bataille’s line) for both taxa B. mendax and B. luridus. Colour pictures taken in habitat of the taxa presented herein are also provided. Finally, according to an ITS analysis, sect. Luridi is shown to be polyphyletic and the importance of morphological features as stipe ornamentation, context colour beneath tubes and amyloid reaction in stipe base is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alessio CL (1985) Boletus Dill. ex L. (sensu lato). Fungi Europaei. Vol. 2. Libreria editrice Biella Giovanna, Saronno

  • Andary C, Cosson L, Bourrier MJ, Wylde R, Heitz A (1992) Chimiotaxonomie des bolets de la section Luridi. Cryptogam Mycol 13:103–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Bataille F (1908) Les bolets, classification et détermination des espèces. Besançon

  • Bertéa P, Estadès A (1990) Boletus luteocupreus. Bull Fed Mycol Dauphiné-Savoie 118:25–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessette AE, Roody WC, Bessette AR, Dunaway DL (1997) Mushrooms of the Southeastern United States. Syracuse University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessette AE, Roody WC, Bessette AR (2000) North American boletes: a color guide to the fleshy pored mushrooms. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezdĕk J (1901) Houby jedlé a jim podobné jedovaté: Podrobné popsání důležitějších druhů hub, četné předpisy jich připravování a pěstování. česky, Alois Srdce, Praha, Hranice

  • Binder M, Hibbett DS (2006) Molecular systematics and biological diversification of Boletales. Mycologia 98:971–981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blum J (1968) Révision des Bolets (Deuxième note). Bull Soc Mycol Fr 84(4):577–602

    Google Scholar 

  • Both EE (1993) The Boletes of North America: a compendium. Buffalo Museum of Science, Buffalo

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulliard JBF (1791) Histoire des Champignons de la France. Paris

  • Cazzoli P 1991 (“1990”) Contributo allo studio dei boleti del gruppo purpureus-torosus. Atti riguardanti il III seminario internazionale di ricerca e studio micologico sugli ordini “Russulales e Boletales”, Il Fungo, A.M.B. Gruppo “R. Franchi”, Reggio Emilia, pp 29–36

  • Cetto B (1976) I funghi dal vero, vol 2. Ed. Saturnia, Trento

    Google Scholar 

  • Cetto B (1982) 1000 funghi, vol 1. E.R.P.I, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu WF (1948) The boletes of Yunnan. Mycologia 40(2):199–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu WF (1957) Icones of the Yunnan boletes. Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Coker WC, Beers AH (1943) The Boletaceae of North Carolina. Univ. North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner EJH (1972) Boletus in Malaysia. GPO, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Dermek A (1979) Fungorum Rariorum Icones Coloratae 9: 1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Dermek A (1987) Fungorum Rariorum Icones Coloratae 16, Boletes III: 1–23

  • Drummond AJ, Ashton B, Buxton S, Cheung M, Cooper A, Duran C, Field M, Heled J, Kearse M, Markowitz S, Moir R, Stones-Havas S, Sturrock S, Thierer T, Wilson A (2010) Geneious v5.3. Available from http://www.geneious.com/

  • Engel H, Krieglsteiner GJ, Dermek A, Watling R (1983) Dickröhrlinge. Die Gattung Boletus in Europa. Heinz Engel Verlag, Weidhausen b. Coburg

  • Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fries EM 1838 [1836-1838] Epicrisis Systematis Mycologici. Uppsala

  • Frost CC (1874) Catalogue of boleti of New England, with descriptions of new species. Bull Buffalo Soc Nat Sci 2:101–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Galli R (2007) I Boleti. Atlante pratico-monografico per la determinazione dei boleti, 3ªth edn. Dalla Natura Ed, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardes M, Bruns TD (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2:113–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert EJ (1931) Les Livres du Mycologue Tome I-IV, Tom. III: Les Bolets. Le François, Paris

  • Grund DW, Harrison AK (1976) Nova Scotian Boletes. J. Cramer, Vaduz

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim R (1963) Diagnoses latines des espèces de Champignons, ou nonda, associés à la folie du komugl taï et du ndaadl. Rev Mycol 28(3–4):277–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinemann P (1964) Boletineae du Katanga. Bull Jard Bot Etat Brux 34(4):425–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hlaváček J (1983) Boletus rhodopurpureus Smotlacha a Boletus smotlachianus sp. n. – hřib rudonachový a hřib Smotlachův. Casopis Cescoslovenskych Houbaru 60(3):71–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Hlaváček J (1995) A survey of our Boletales, 29. Mykologický Sborník 72(3):83–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Hlaváček J (1996) Přehled našich hub hřibotvarých (Boletales). Mykologický Sborník 73(3):81–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Hongo T (1967) Notulae Mycologicae (6). Mem Shiga Univ 17:89–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754–755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Imler L (1934) Remarques sur un Boletus Queletii Schulz. à pied réticulé. Bull Soc Mycol Fr 50:307

    Google Scholar 

  • Imler L (1950) Recherches sur les bolets. Bull Soc Mycol Fr 66(4):177–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Inzenga G (1869) Funghi Siciliani. Cent. 2, t. 2. Palermo

  • Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T (2002) MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucl Acids Res 30:3059–3066

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kibby G (2011) British boletes with keys to species, privately published by the author, London

  • Klofac W (2007) Schlüssel zur Bestimmung von Frischfunden der europäischen Arten der Boletales mit röhrigem Hymenophor. Öst Z Pilzk 16:187–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen H, Taylor A (2012) Boletus L.: Fr. In: Knudsen H & Vesterholt J (eds), Funga Nordica, 2nd edition (2-volume set). Agaricoid, boletoid, clavarioid, cyphelloid and gastroid genera. Nordsvamp, Copenhagen, pp 217–222 (Vol. 1)

  • Kornerup A, Wanscher JH (1978) Methuen handbook of colour and colour dictionary, 3rd edn. Eyre Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lannoy G, Estades A (2001) Les Bolets. Flore mycologique d’Europe. Documents Mycologique Mémoire Hors série 6: 1–163. Association d’Écologie et de Mycologie, Lille

  • Leclair A, Essette H (1969) Les bolets. Ed. Paul Chevalier, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Maire R (1910) Notes critiques sur quelques champignons récoltés pendant la session de Dijon de la Société Mycologique de France (octobre 1909). Bull Soc Mycol Fr 26(2):159–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Maire R (1937) Fungi Catalaunici Series altera. Contribucion à l’étude de la Flore Mycologique de la Catalogne, Boletaceae. Publ Inst Bot Barcelona 3(4):40–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques GM, Pinto CC, Muñoz JA (2010) DNA barcoding Mediterranean Boletales. ECBOL 2, 2010 International Year of Biodiversity, 2 Conference of the European Consortium for the Barcode of Life, 2-4 June 2010, Braga, Portugal, Book of Abstracts: S4P4, p 74

  • Massee GE (1914) Fungi Exotici XVII. Bull misc Inf R bot Gdns Kew 1914:72–76

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill J, Barrie FR, Buck WR, Demoulin V, Greuter W, Hawksworth DL, Herendeen PS, Knapp S, Marhold K, Prado J, Prud’homme van Reine WF, Smith GE, Wiersema JH, Turland NJ (eds) (2012) International code of nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code), adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress Melbourne, Australia, July 2011. Regnum Vegetabile. Gantner Verlag, Ruggell

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010) “Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees” in Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 14 Nov. 2010, New Orleans, LA pp 1–8

  • Muñoz JA (2005) Boletus s.l. (excl. Xerocomus). Fungi Europaei 2. Edizioni Candusso, Alassio

  • Murrill WA (1948) Florida boletes. Lloydia 11:21–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz-Santana B, Lodge DJ, Baroni TJ, Both EE (2007) Boletes from Belize and the Dominican Republic. Fungal Divers 27(2):247–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulet JJ (1793) Traité des Champignons. Louvre, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck CH (1889) Boleti of the United States. Bull NY St Mus 2(8):73–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Persoon CH (1825) Mycologia Europaea, vol. II. Erlangen

  • Pilát A, Dermek A (1974) Hríbovité huby. Československé hríbovité a sliziakovité huby (BoletaceaeGomphidiaceae). Veda, Bratislava

  • Redeuilh G (1992) Contribution à l’étude des bolets II. Étude critique de Boletus torosus et Boletus xanthocyaneus. Bull Soc Mycol Fr 108(4):155–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostkovius FWT (1844) Deutschlands Flora, Abt. III. Die Pilze Deutschlands. Vol. 5-23/24. Sturm, Nürnberg

  • Schaeffer JC (1774) Fungorum qui in Bavaria et Palatinatu circa Ratisbonam nascuntur Icones, Tomo IV. Regensburg

  • Schulzer S (1885) Einige neue Pilz-Species u. varietäten aus Slavonien. Hedwigia 24(4):129–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulzer S (1887) Vier neue Arten aus der Fungi Slavonici adhuc ined. Hedwigia 26:191–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Secretan L (1833) Mycographie Suisse ou Description des champignons qui croissent en Suisse. Tome troisième, Bonnant

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simonini G (1993) [1992] Boletus comptus sp. nov. Riv Micol 35(3):195–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonini G (2001) Discussione di alcune raccolte di boleti della sezione Luridi di difficile determinazione. Micol Veg Medit 16(1):4–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonini G, Bertolini V (2012) Schede d’identità dei Boleti d’Europa. Gruppo 7: Sottosezione Torosi. Pagine di Micologia 36:1–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonini G, Lavorato C (1997) Boletus flavosanguineus sp. nov. Riv Micol 39(1):37–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer R (1931) Pilze aus dem Kaukasus II. Ein Beitrag zur Flora Swanetiens und einiger angrenzender Täler. Bot Zentralbl, Beih 48(II):513–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer R (1945) New Boletaceae from Florida. Mycologia 37:797–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer R (1947) The Boletoideae of Florida. The Boletineae of Florida with notes on extralimital species III. Amer Midland Naturalist 37(1):1–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer R (1965) Die Röhrlinge, Teil I. Boletaceae (ohne Boletoideae). Julius Klinkhardt verlag, Bad Heilbrunn

  • Singer R (1967) Die Röhrlinge, Teil II. Die Boletoideae und Strobilomycetaceae. Julius Klinkhardt Verlag, Bad Heilbrunn

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer R (1986) The Agaricales in modern taxonomy, 4th edn. Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith AH, Thiers HD (1971) The boletes of Michigan. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell WH, Dick EA (1970) The boleti of northeastern North America. J. Cramer, Lehre

  • Stamatakis A (2006) RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22:2688–2690

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Šutara J, Mikšík M, Janda V (2009) Hřibovité houby. Čeled’ Boletaceae a rody Gyrodon, Gyroporus, Boletinus a Suillus. Academia, Praha

  • Takahashi H, Taneyama Y, Koyama A (2011) Boletus kermesinus, a new species of Boletus sect. Luridi from central Honshu, Japan. Mycoscience 52:419–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thiers HD (1965) California Boletes. I Mycologia 57(4):524–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiers HD (1975) California Mushrooms. A Field Guide to the Boletes. Hafner Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiers B (2013) (continuously updated): Index Herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria and associated staff, New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium. http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/

  • Velenovský J (1922) Ceske Houby 4–5:633–950

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Liu P, Yu F (2004) Color atlas of wild commercial mushrooms in Yunnan. Yunnan Science and Technology Press

  • Watling R (1970) Boletaceae, Gomphidiaceae and Paxillaceae. In: Henderson DM, Orton PD, Watling R (eds) British Fungus flora: agarics and boleti, vol 1. Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Watling R, Hills AE (2005) British Fungus Flora. Agarics and Boleti. 1. Boletes and their allies. Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh

  • Watling R, Li TH (1999) Australian Boletes. A Preliminary Survey. Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • White TJ, Bruns TD, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand D, Sninsky J, White T (eds) PCR Protocols, a guide to methods and applications. Academic, Orlando, pp 315–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Zang M (ed) (2006) Flora Fungorum Sinicorum, vol 22. Boletaceae. Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank all friends and colleagues who have sent us material for our investigation and who have contributed through useful discussions to define the taxa treated in this work, in particular: Ulderico Bonazzi (Regnano, Reggio Emilia, Italy), Giovanni Consiglio (Casalecchio di Reno, Bologna, Italy), Matteo Gelardi (Bracciano, Roma, Italy), Carmine Lavorato (San Demetrio Corone, Cosenza, Italy), Mauro Sarnari (Terni, Italy), Gianfranco Visentin (Boara Polesine, Rovigo, Italy) and Gang Wu (Kunming Institute of Botany, China). We also thank the Curators of the herbaria of the Civic Museum of Venice (MCVE), Giovanni and Maurella Robich (Campalto, Venezia, Italy), and of the Mycological Association Bresadola (AMB), Gianfranco Medardi (Rezzato, Brescia), for availability and patience toward us, and Caroline Hobart (Sheffield) for improving the English text.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alfredo Vizzini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vizzini, A., Simonini, G., Ercole, E. et al. Boletus mendax, a new species of Boletus sect. Luridi from Italy and insights on the B. luridus complex. Mycol Progress 13, 95–109 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-013-0896-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-013-0896-4

Keywords

Navigation