Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lactarius sanguifluus versus Lactarius vinosus — Molecular and morphological analyses

  • Published:
Mycological Progress Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lactarius vinosus is often considered as a variety of L. sanguifluus. Morphological (especially macroscopical characters and spore-ornamentation) and molecular arguments (based on ITS-sequencing) are given here to treat it as a separate species. Its relationship to closely related species of Lactarius section Deliciosi is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barla JB (1855) Tableau comparatif des champignons comestibles et vénéreux de Nice, Nice.

  • Barla JB (1859) Les champignons de la province de Nice et principalement les espèces comestibles, suspectes ou vénéneuses, dessinés d’après nature, Nice.

  • Basso MT (1999) Lactarius Pers. Fungi Europei, VIII, Mycoflora, Alassio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bataille F (1908) Flore monographique des astérosporés. Lactaires et Russules. — Mémoires de la Société d’Émulation du Doubs, 8 sér., 2: 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergendorff O, Sterner O (1988) The sesquiterpenes of Lactarius deliciosus and L. deterrimus. — Phytochemistry 27: 97–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blum J (1976) Les Lactaires. Etudes mycologiques 3, Paul Lechevalier, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bon M (1980) Clé monographique du genre Lactarius. — Documents Mycologiques 10: 1–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtecuisse R, Duhem B (1994) Les champignons de France. Delachaux et Niestlé. Eclectis, Lausanne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dähncke RM (1993) 1200 Pilze in Farbfotos. AT Verlag, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt U (2000) Moleculare Analysen zur Verwandtschaft der agaricoiden Russulaceen im Vergleich mit Mykorrhiza-und Fruchtkörpermerkmalen. Doctoral thesis, University of Tübingen.

  • Ewing B, Green P (1998) Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. — Genome Research 8: 186–194.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P (1998) Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. — Genome Research 8: 175–185.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gardes M, Bruns TD (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes — application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. — Molecular Ecology 2: 113–118.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heilmann-Clausen J, Verbeken A, Vesterholt J (1998) The genus Lactarius. Fungi of Northern Europe 2. Denmark.

  • Kimura M (1981) Estimation of evolutionary distances between homologous nucleotide sequences. — Proceedings of the National Acadademy of Sciences of the USA 78: 454–458.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad P, Maublanc A (1952) Les Agaricales. Tome 2. Paul Lechevalier, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornerup A, Wanscher JH (1962) Farver i Farver. Politikens Forlag, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühner R, Romagnesi H (1953) Flore analytique des Champignons supérieurs. Masson, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuyper TW, Van Vuure M (1985) Nomenclatural notes on Russula. — Persoonia 12: 447–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalli G, Frizzi G, Pacioni G (2002) Biochemical systematics of some species of Lactarius section Dapetes. — Plant Biosystems 136: 115–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchand A (1971) Champignons du Nord et du Midi 1. Les meilleurs comestibles et les principaux vénéreux. Perpignan.

  • Marchand A (1980) Champignons du Nord et du Midi 6. Lactaires et pholiotes. Perpignan.

  • Marxmüller H, Romagnesi H (1991) Lactarius sanguifluus (Paulet: Fr.) Fr. var. vinosus Quélet. — Bulletin de la Société Mycologique de France 107: Atlas pl. 262.

  • Moser M, Jülich W (1996) Farbatlas der Basidiomyceten, IV, 14. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuhoff W (1956) Die Milchlinge (Lactarii). In Die Pilze Mitteleuropas Bd. IIb. Julius Klinkhardt, Bad Heilbrunn Obb.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulet JJ (1811) Traité des Champignons, Vol. 2, 9th ed.

  • Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. — Bioinformatics 14: 817–818.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quélet L (1881) Quelques espèces critiques ou nouvelles de la flora mycologique de France. Compte rendu de l’Association Française pour l’Avancement des Sciences. — Congres de Reims 1880. 9: 661–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt JA (1974) Chemotaxonomische, morphologische und pflanzensoziologische Studien an mitteleuropäischen Lactarius-Arten der Sektion Dapetes Fr. (Blutreizker). — Zeitschrift für Pilzkunde 39: 219–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford DL, Olsen GJ, Wadell PJ, Hillis DM (1996) Phylogenetic interference. In Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK (eds) Molecular Systematics, pp. 407–514. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (* and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. — Nucleic Acids Research 22: 4373–4680.

    Google Scholar 

  • White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor JW (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, pp. 315–322. Academic Press, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dpt. Biology, Group Mycology, Ghent Univ., K.L. Ledeganckstr. 35, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium

    Jorinde Nuytinck & Annemieke Verbeken

Authors
  1. Jorinde Nuytinck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Annemieke Verbeken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorinde Nuytinck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nuytinck, J., Verbeken, A. Lactarius sanguifluus versus Lactarius vinosus — Molecular and morphological analyses. Mycol Progress 2, 227–234 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-006-0060-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-006-0060-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation