Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this preliminary study was to determine the error range compared with preoperative plans in proximal femoral osteotomy conducted using a computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system.
Methods
Four patients (four hips) underwent transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy (TRO), and three patients (four hips) underwent curved varus osteotomy (CVO) using CT-based navigation. Volume registration of pre- and postoperative CT was performed for error assessment.
Results
In TRO, the mean osteotomy angle error was \(1.1^{\circ }\) (range \(0^{\circ }{-}3.1^{\circ }\)) in the valgus direction and \(1.8^{\circ }\) (range \(0^{\circ }{-}4.3^{\circ }\)) in the retroversion direction. The mean osteotomy position error, with the femoral head side as positive, was −0.4 mm (range −1.4 to 0 mm). The bone fragment rotational movement error was \(2.5^{\circ }\) (range \(0^{\circ }{-}10^{\circ }\)). In CVO, the mean osteotomy position error, with the femoral head side as positive, was −0.2 mm (range −2.0 to 1.7 mm) at the level of the lesser trochanter and 0.8 mm (range 0–3.2 mm) at the level of the greater trochanter. Bone fragment varus accuracy was \(2.3^{\circ }\) (range \(0^{\circ }{-}5^{\circ }\)).
Conclusions
In proximal femoral osteotomy using CT-based navigation, the angle error of osteotomy was within \(5^{\circ }\) and the positional error was within 4 mm. The rotational movement error of the proximal fragment was within \(10^{\circ }\). These margins of error should be considered in preoperative planning. To improve surgical accuracy, it would be necessary to develop a computer-assisted device which can track the osteotomized fragment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sugioka Y (1978) Transtrochanteric anterior rotational osteotomy of the femoral head in the treatment of osteonecrosis affecting the hip: a new osteotomy operation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 130:191–201
Sakano S, Hasegawa Y, Torii Y, Kawasaki M, Ishiguro N (2004) Curved intertrochanteric varus osteotomy for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(3):359–365
Sugano N, Takaoka K, Ohzono K, Matsui M, Saito M, Saito S (1992) Rotational osteotomy for non-traumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74(5):734–739
Miyanishi K, Noguchi Y, Yamamoto T, Irisa T, Suenaga E, Jingushi S, Sugioka Y, Iwamoto Y (2000) Prediction of the outcome of transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82(4):512–516
Atsumi T, Kajiwara T, Hiranuma Y, Tamaoki S, Asakura Y (2006) Posterior rotational osteotomy for nontraumatic osteonecrosis with extensive collapsed lesions in young patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(Suppl 3):42–47. doi:10.2106/jbjs.f.00767
Zhao G, Yamamoto T, Ikemura S, Motomura G, Iwasaki K, Yamaguchi R, Nakashima Y, Mawatari T, Iwamoto Y (2012) Clinico-radiological factors affecting the joint space narrowing after transtrochanteric anterior rotational osteotomy for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Orthop Sci 17(4):390–396. doi:10.1007/s00776-012-0238-4
Zhao G, Yamamoto T, Ikemura S, Motomura G, Mawatari T, Nakashima Y, Iwamoto Y (2010) Radiological outcome analysis of transtrochanteric curved varus osteotomy for osteonecrosis of the femoral head at a mean follow-up of 12.4 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(6):781–786. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.92b6.23621
Hamanishi M, Yasunaga Y, Yamasaki T, Mori R, Shoji T, Ochi M (2014) The clinical and radiographic results of intertrochanteric curved varus osteotomy for idiopathic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(3):305–310. doi:10.1007/s00402-013-1919-y
Sonoda K, Yamamoto T, Motomura G, Nakashima Y, Yamaguchi R, Iwamoto Y (2015) Outcome of transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy for posttraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head with a mean follow-up of 12.3 years. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135(9):1257–1263. doi:10.1007/s00402-015-2282-y
Koyama T, Sugano N, Nishii T, Miki H, Takao M, Sato Y, Yoshikawa H, Tamura S (2009) MRI-based surgical simulation of transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy for femoral head osteonecrosis. J Orthop Res 27(4):447–451. doi:10.1002/jor.20568
Sugano N, Atsumi T, Ohzono K, Kubo T, Hotokebuchi T, Takaoka K (2002) The 2001 revised criteria for diagnosis, classification, and staging of idiopathic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Orthop Sci 7(5):601–605. doi:10.1007/s007760200108
Steinberg ME, Hayken GD, Steinberg DR (1995) A quantitative system for staging avascular necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77(1):34–41
Kerboul M, Thomine J, Postel M, Merle d’Aubigne R (1974) The conservative surgical treatment of idiopathic aseptic necrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Br 56(2):291–296
Ha YC, Jung WH, Kim JR, Seong NH, Kim SY, Koo KH (2006) Prediction of collapse in femoral head osteonecrosis: a modified Kerboul method with use of magnetic resonance images. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(Suppl 3):35–40. doi:10.2106/jbjs.f.00535
Xu K, Li YM, Zhang HF, Wang CG, Xu YQ, Li ZJ (2014) Computer navigation in total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J surg (London, England) 12(5):528–533. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.02.014
Langlotz F, Stucki M, Bachler R, Scheer C, Ganz R, Berlemann U, Nolte LP (1997) The first twelve cases of computer assisted periacetabular osteotomy. Comput Aided Surg 2(6):317–326. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0150(1997)2:6<;317::aid-igs1>;3.0.co;2-2
Langlotz F, Bachler R, Berlemann U, Nolte LP, Ganz R (1998) Computer assistance for pelvic osteotomies. Clin Orthop Relat Res 354:92–102
Nakahodo K, Sasama T, Sato Y, Sugano N, Ohzono K, Nishii T, Nishihara S, Yonenobu K, Ochi T, Tamura S (2000) Intraoperative update of 3D bone model during computer navigation of pelvic osteotomies using real-time 3D position data. In: Lemke H, Vannier M, Inamura K, Farman A, Doi K (eds) Computer assisted radiology and surgery. 14th international symposium and exhibition (CARS 2000), San Francisco, CA, 2000. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 252–256
Mayman DJ, Rudan J, Yach J, Ellis R (2002) The Kingston periacetabular osteotomy utilizing computer enhancement: a new technique. Comput Aided Surg 7(3):179–186. doi:10.1002/igs.10041
Sugano N, Takao M, Sakai T, Nishii T, Miki H (2016) Safety and accuracy of CT-based navigation for rotational acetabular osteotomy. Formos J Musculoskelet Disord 7(1):44–50. doi:10.6492/fjmd.20151007
Akiyama H, Goto K, So K, Nakamura T (2010) Computed tomography-based navigation for curved periacetabular osteotomy. J Orthop Sci 15(6):829–833. doi:10.1007/s00776-010-1520-y
Hsieh PH, Chang YH, Shih CH (2006) Image-guided periacetabular osteotomy: computer-assisted navigation compared with the conventional technique: a randomized study of 36 patients followed for 2 years. Acta Orthop 77(4):591–597. doi:10.1080/17453670610012656
Inaba Y, Kobayashi N, Ike H, Kubota S, Saito T (2016) Computer-assisted rotational acetabular osteotomy for patients with acetabular dysplasia. Clin Orthop Surg 8(1):99–105. doi:10.4055/cios.2016.8.1.99
Takao M, Nishii T, Sakai T, Sugano N (2016) Comparison of rotational acetabular osteotomy performed with navigation by surgeons with different levels of experience of osteotomies. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. doi:10.1007/s11548-016-1494-0
Kitada M, Nakamura N, Iwana D, Kakimoto A, Nishii T, Sugano N (2011) Evaluation of the accuracy of computed tomography-based navigation for femoral stem orientation and leg length discrepancy. J Arthroplast 26(5):674–679. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2010.08.001
Kitada M, Sakai T, Murase T, Hanada T, Nakamura N, Sugano N (2013) Validation of the femoral component placement during hip resurfacing: a comparison between the conventional jig, patient-specific template, and CT-based navigation. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg MRCAS 9(2):223–229. doi:10.1002/rcs.1490
Bailey C, Gul R, Falworth M, Zadow S, Oakeshott R (2009) Component alignment in hip resurfacing using computer navigation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(4):917–922. doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0584-x
Olsen M, Schemitsch EH (2011) Avoiding short-term femoral neck fracture with imageless computer navigation for hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(6):1621–1626. doi:10.1007/s11999-010-1607-y
Schnurr C, Michael JW, Eysel P, Konig DP (2009) Imageless navigation of hip resurfacing arthroplasty increases the implant accuracy. Int Orthop 33(2):365–372. doi:10.1007/s00264-007-0494-7
Akiyama H, Kawanabe K, Goto K, Ohnishi E, Nakamura T (2007) Computer-assisted fluoroscopic navigation system for removal of distal femoral bone cement in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 22(3):445–448. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2006.11.010
Hamelinck HK, Haagmans M, Snoeren MM, Biert J, van Vugt AB, Frolke JP (2007) Safety of computer-assisted surgery for cannulated hip screws. Clin Orthop Relat Res 455:241–245. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000238815.40777.d2
Liebergall M, Ben-David D, Weil Y, Peyser A, Mosheiff R (2006) Computerized navigation for the internal fixation of femoral neck fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(8):1748–1754. doi:10.2106/jbjs.e.00137
Wong KC, Kumta SM, Chiu KH, Antonio GE, Unwin P, Leung KS (2007) Precision tumour resection and reconstruction using image-guided computer navigation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(7):943–947. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.89b7.19067
Pflugi S, Liu L, Ecker TM, Schumann S, Larissa Cullmann J, Siebenrock K, Zheng G (2015) A cost-effective surgical navigation solution for periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. doi:10.1007/s11548-015-1267-1
Murphy RJ, Armiger RS, Lepisto J, Mears SC, Taylor RH, Armand M (2015) Development of a biomechanical guidance system for periacetabular osteotomy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10(4):497–508. doi:10.1007/s11548-014-1116-7
Otsuki B, Takemoto M, Kawanabe K, Awa Y, Akiyama H, Fujibayashi S, Nakamura T, Matsuda S (2013) Developing a novel custom cutting guide for curved peri-acetabular osteotomy. Int Orthop 37(6):1033–1038. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-1873-x
Radermacher K, Portheine F, Anton M, Zimolong A, Kaspers G, Rau G, Staudte HW (1998) Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery with image based individual templates. Clin Orthop Relat Res 354:28–38
Ma B, Kunz M, Gammon B, Ellis RE, Pichora DR (2014) A laboratory comparison of computer navigation and individualized guides for distal radius osteotomy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 9(4):713–724. doi:10.1007/s11548-013-0966-8
Murase T, Oka K, Moritomo H, Goto A, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K (2008) Three-dimensional corrective osteotomy of malunited fractures of the upper extremity with use of a computer simulation system. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(11):2375–2389. doi:10.2106/jbjs.g.01299
Wong KC, Sze KY, Wong IO, Wong CM, Kumta SM (2016) Patient-specific instrument can achieve same accuracy with less resection time than navigation assistance in periacetabular pelvic tumor surgery: a cadaveric study. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 11(2):307–316. doi:10.1007/s11548-015-1250-x
Chen WP, Tai CL, Tan CF, Shih CH, Hou SH, Lee MS (2005) The degrees to which transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy moves the region of osteonecrotic femoral head out of the weight-bearing area as evaluated by computer simulation. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 20(1):63–69. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.08.001
Sakai T, Sugano N, Nishii T, Haraguchi K, Ochi T, Ohzono K (2000) MR findings of necrotic lesions and the extralesional area of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Skelet Radiol 29(3):133–141
Ikemura S, Yamamoto T, Jingushi S, Nakashima Y, Mawatari T, Iwamoto Y (2007) Leg-length discrepancy after transtrochanteric curved varus osteotomy for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(6):725–729. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.89b6.18499
Chen WP, Tai CL, Shih CH, Hsieh PH, Leou MC, Lee MS (2004) Selection of fixation devices in proximal femur rotational osteotomy: clinical complications and finite element analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 19(3):255–262. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.12.003
Acknowledgements
This study was supported in part by the Japanese Health Labor Sciences Research Grant provided by Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (JP) and by the Practical Research Project for Rare/Intractable Diseases from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
For this type of study formal consent is not required.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Takao, M., Sakai, T., Hamada, H. et al. Error range in proximal femoral osteotomy using computer tomography-based navigation. Int J CARS 12, 2087–2096 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1577-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1577-6