Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Entropy-based particle correspondence for shape populations

  • Review Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Statistical shape analysis of anatomical structures plays an important role in many medical image analysis applications such as understanding the structural changes in anatomy in various stages of growth or disease. Establishing accurate correspondence across object populations is essential for such statistical shape analysis studies.

Methods

In this paper, we present an entropy-based correspondence framework for computing point-based correspondence among populations of surfaces in a groupwise manner. This robust framework is parameterization-free and computationally efficient. We review the core principles of this method as well as various extensions to deal effectively with surfaces of complex geometry and application-driven correspondence metrics.

Results

We apply our method to synthetic and biological datasets to illustrate the concepts proposed and compare the performance of our framework to existing techniques.

Conclusions

Through the numerous extensions and variations presented here, we create a very flexible framework that can effectively handle objects of various topologies, multi-object complexes, open surfaces, and objects of complex geometry such as high-curvature regions or extremely thin features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.nitrc.org/projects/shapeworks.

References

  1. Davies R (2002) Learning shape: optimal models for analysing shape variability. University of Manchester. Ph.D. thesis

  2. Oguz I, Cates J, Fletcher T, Whitaker R, Cool D, Aylward S, Styner M (2008) Cortical correspondence using entropy-based particle systems and local features. In: 5th IEEE international symposium on biomedical imaging: from nano to macro. ISBI 2008, pp 1637–1640. doi:10.1109/ISBI.2008.4541327

  3. Datar M, Gur Y, Paniagua B, Styner M, Whitaker R (2011) Geometric correspondence for ensembles of nonregular shapes. In: Fichtinger G, Martel A, Peters T (eds) Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention MICCAI. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 6892. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 368–375. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23629-7_45

  4. Cates J, Meyer M, Fletcher T, Whitaker R (2006) Entropy-based particle systems for shape correspondence. In: Xavier P, Sarang J (eds) 1st MICCAI workshop on mathematical foundations of computational anatomy: geometrical, statistical and registration methods for modeling biological shape variability. Copenhagen, Denmark, pp 90–99

  5. Cates J, Fletcher T, Warnock Z, Whitaker R (2008) A shape analysis framework for small animal phenotyping with application to mice with a targeted disruption of hoxd11. In: 5th IEEE international symposium on biomedical imaging: from nano to macro. ISBI 2008, pp 512–515. doi:10.1109/ISBI.2008.4541045

  6. Cates J, Fletcher P.T, Styner M, Shenton M, Whitaker R (2007) Shape modeling and analysis with entropy-based particle systems. In: Karssemeijer N, Lelieveldt B (eds) Information processing in medical imaging. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4584. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 333–345. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73273-0_28

  7. Oguz I, Niethammer M, Cates J, Whitaker R, Fletcher T, Vachet C, Styner M (2009) Cortical correspondence with probabilistic fiber connectivity. In: Jerry LP, Dzung LP, Kyle JM (eds) Information processing in medical imaging. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 5636. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 651–663. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02498-6_54

  8. Cates J, Fletcher T, Styner M, Hazlett H, Whitaker R (2008) Particle-based shape analysis of multi-object complexes. In: Metaxas D, Axel L, Fichtinger G, SzÃkely G (eds) Medical image computing and computer-assisted interventionâ–MICCAI. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 5241. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 477–485. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85988-8_57

  9. Datar M, Cates J, Fletcher T, Gouttard S, Gerig G, Whitaker R (2009) Particle based shape regression of open surfaces with applications to developmental neuroimaging. In: MICCAI, pp 167–174

  10. Lee J, Lyu I, Oguz I, Styner M (2013) Particle-guided image registration. In: MICCAI, pp 1–8

  11. Lyu I, Kim S, Seong J, Yoo S, Evans A, Shi Y, Sanchez M, Niethammer M, Styner M (2013) Group-wise cortical correspondence via sulcal curve-constrained entropy minimization. In: IPMI, pp 364–375

  12. Datar M, Lyu I, Kim S, Cates J, Styner M, Whitaker R (2013) Geodesic distances to landmarks for dense correspondence on ensembles of complex shapes. In: MICCAI, pp 19–26

  13. Dalal P, Shi F, Shen D, Wang S (2010) Multiple cortical surface correspondence using pairwise shape similarity. In: Jiang T, Navab N, Pluim JPW, Viergever MA (eds) Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention–MICCAI. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 6361. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 349–356

  14. Fischl B, Sereno M, Tootell R, Dale A (1999) High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Hum Brain Mapp 8(4):272–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Goebel R, Esposito F, Formisano E (2006) Analysis of FIAC data with BrainVoyager QX: from single-subject to cortically aligned group general linear model analysis and self-organizing group independent component analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 27(5):392–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Meier D, Fisher E (2002) Parameter space warping: shape-based correspondence between morphologically different objects. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 21(1):31–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brechbühler C, Gerig G, Kubler O (1995) Parametrization of closed surfaces for 3-D shape description. Comput Vis Image Underst 61(2):154–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Styner M, Oguz I, Xu S, Brechbühler C, Pantazis D, Levitt J, Shenton M, Gerig G (2006) Framework for the statistical shape analysis of brain structures using SPHARM-PDM. Insight J 1071:242–250

  19. Tosun D, Prince J (2005) Cortical surface alignment using geometry driven multispectral optical flow. In: Christensen GE, Sonka M (eds) Information processing in medical imaging. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3565. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 480–492. doi:10.1007/11505730_40

  20. Wang Y, Peterson B, Staib L (2000) Shape-based 3D surface correspondence using geodesics and local geometry. In: IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2000, vol 2, pp 644–651. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2000.854933

  21. Talairach J, Tournoux P (1988) Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. 3D proportional system: an approach to cerebral imaging. Thieme Medical, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  22. Klein A, Andersson J, Ardekani B, Ashburner J, Avants B, Chiang M, Christensen G, Collins L, Gee J, Hellier P, Song J, Jenkinson M, Lepage C, Rueckert D, Thompson P, Vercauteren T, Woods R, Mann J, Parsey R (2009) Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration. Neuroimage 46(3):786–802

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Cootes T, Taylor C, Cooper D, Graham J (1995) Active shape models—their training and application. Comput Vis Image Understand 61:38–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Grenander U, Miller M (1998) Computational anatomy: an emerging discipline. Q Appl Math LVI(4):617–694

  25. Bookstein F (1996) Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. Med Image Anal 1:225–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kotcheff A, Taylor C (1998) Automatic construction of eigenshape models by direct optimization. Med Image Anal 2(4):303–314

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Davies R, Twining C, Cootes T, Waterton J, Taylor C (2002) A minimum description length approach to statistical shape modeling. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 21(5):525–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Heimann T, Wolf I, Williams T, Meinzer H (2005) 3D active shape models using gradient descent optimization of description length. In: Christensen GE, Sonka M (eds) Information processing in medical imaging. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3565. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 566–577. doi:10.1007/11505730_47

  29. Twining C, Davies R, Taylor C (2007) Non-parametric surface-based regularisation for building statistical shape models. In: Karssemeijer N, Lelieveldt B (eds) Information processing in medical imaging. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4584. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 738–750. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73273-0_61

  30. Ward A, Hamarneh G (2010) The groupwise medial axis transform for fuzzy skeletonization and pruning. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 32(6):1084–1096. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2009.81

  31. Styner M, Oguz I, Heimann T, Gerig G (2008) Minimum description length with local geometry. In: Biomedical imaging: from nano to macro, 2008. ISBI 2008. 5th IEEE International Symposium on, pp 1283–1286. doi:10.1109/ISBI.2008.4541238

  32. Rueda S, Udupa J, Bai L (2010) Shape modeling via local curvature scale. Pattern Recognit Lett 31(4):324–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ericsson A, Karlsson J (2007) Measures for benchmarking of automatic correspondence algorithms. J Math Imaging Vis 28(3):225–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Heimann T, Wolf I, Meinzer H (2007) Automatic generation of 3d statistical shape models with optimal landmark distributions. Methods Inf Med 46(3):275–281

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gu X, Yau S-T (2003) Global conformal surface parameterization. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Eurographics/ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on geometry processing. SGP ’03. Eurographics Association, Aachen, Germany, pp 127–137

  36. Styner MA, Rajamani KT, Nolte L, Zsemlye G, Szekely G, Taylor C, Davies RH (2003) Evaluation of 3D correspondence methods for model building. In: Taylor C, Noble JA (eds) Information Processing in medical imaging. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 2732. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 63–75. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-45087-0_6

  37. Cover T, Thomas J (1991) Elements of information theory. Wiley, Hoboken

  38. Meyer MD, George IP, Whitaker RT (2005) Robust particle systems for curvature dependent sampling of implicit surfaces. In: Shape modeling and applications, 2005 international conference, pp 124–133. doi:10.1109/SMI.2005.41

  39. Vachet C, Cody HH, Niethammer M, Oguz I, Cates J, Whitaker R, Piven J, Styner M (2011) Group-wise automatic mesh-based analysis of cortical thickness. Proc SPIE. 7962:796227–796227. doi:10.1117/12.878300

  40. Thodberg H (2003) Minimum description length shape and appearance models. In: Taylor C, Noble JA (eds) Information processing in medical imaging. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 51–62. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-45087-0_5

  41. Ericsson A, Åström K (2003) Minimizing the description length using steepest descent. In: Proc. British machine vision conference, Norwich, United Kingdom, vol 2, pp 93–102

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is part of the National Alliance for Medical Image Computing (NAMIC), funded through the NIH Roadmap for Medical Research, U54-EB005149. This research is also partially funded by UNC NDRC HD03110.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA

    Ipek Oguz

  2. University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

    Josh Cates, Manasi Datar, Thomas Fletcher, Clement Vachet & Ross Whitaker

  3. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

    Beatriz Paniagua & Martin Styner

Authors
  1. Ipek Oguz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Josh Cates
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Manasi Datar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Beatriz Paniagua
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Thomas Fletcher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Clement Vachet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Martin Styner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ross Whitaker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ipek Oguz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008(5). All institutional and national guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals were followed.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oguz, I., Cates, J., Datar, M. et al. Entropy-based particle correspondence for shape populations. Int J CARS 11, 1221–1232 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1319-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1319-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation