Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Estimation of intraoperative brain shift by combination of stereovision and doppler ultrasound: phantom and animal model study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Combination of various intraoperative imaging modalities potentially can reduce error of brain shift estimation during neurosurgical operations. In the present work, a new combination of surface imaging and Doppler US images is proposed to calculate the displacements of cortical surface and deformation of internal vessels in order to estimate the targeted brain shift using a Finite Element Model (FEM). Registration error in each step and the overall performance of the method are evaluated.

Methods

The preoperative steps include constructing a FEM from MR images and extracting vascular tree from MR Angiography (MRA). As the first intraoperative step, after the craniotomy and with the dura opened, a designed checkerboard pattern is projected on the cortex surface and projected landmarks are scanned and captured by a stereo camera (Int J Imaging Syst Technol 23(4):294–303, 2013. doi: 10.1002/ima.22064). This 3D point cloud should be registered to boundary nodes of FEM in the region of interest. For this purpose, we developed a new non-rigid registration method, called finite element drift that is more compatible with the underlying nature of deformed object. The presented algorithm outperforms other methods such as coherent point drift when the deformation is local or non-coherent. After registration, the acquired displacement vectors are used as boundary conditions for FE model. As the second step, by tracking a 2D Doppler ultrasound probe swept on the parenchyma, a 3D image of deformed vascular tree is constructed. Elastic registration of this vascular point cloud to the corresponding preoperative data results the second series of displacement vector applicable to closest internal nodes of FEM. After running FE analysis, the displacement of all nodes is calculated. The brain shift is then estimated as displacement of nodes in boundary of a deep target, e.g., a tumor. We used intraoperative MR (iMR) images as the references for measuring the performance of the brain shift estimator. In the present study, two set of tests were performed using: (a) a deformable brain phantom with surface data and (b) an alive brain of an approximately big dog with surface data and US Doppler images. In our designed phantom, small tubes connected to an inflatable balloon were considered as displaceable targets and in the animal model, the target was modeled by a cyst which was created by an injection.

Results

In the phantom study, the registration error for the surface points before FE analysis and for the target points after running FE model were \({<}0.76\) and 1.4 mm, respectively. In a real condition of operating room for animal model, the registration error was about 1 mm for the surface, 1.9 mm for the vascular tree and 1.55 mm for the target points.

Conclusions

The proposed projected surface imaging in conjunction with the Doppler US data combined in a powerful biomechanical model can result an acceptable performance in calculation of deformation during surgical navigation. However, the projected landmark method is sensitive to ambient light and surface conditions and the Doppler ultrasound suffers from noise and 3D image construction problems, the combination of these two methods applied on a FEM has an eligible performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Parseh Intelligent Surgical Systems Parsiss Company, Tehran, Iran. www.parsiss.com.

References

  1. Ahmadian A, Dadashi Serej N, Karimifard S, Farnia P (2013) An efficient method for estimation of soft tissue deformation based on intra-operative stereo image features and point-based registration. Int J Imaging Syst Technol 23(4):294–303. doi:10.1002/ima.22064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Cerny S, Hastreiter P, Greiner G, Fahlbusch R (2000) Quantification of, visualization of, and compensation for brain shift using intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 47(5):1070–1080

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nabavi A, Black P, Gering D, Westin C, Mehta V, Pergolizz R Jr, Ferrant M, Warfield S, Hata N, Schwartz R, Wells W, Kikinis R, Jolesz F (2001) Serial intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging of brain shift. Neurosurgery 48(4):787–797

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reinges M, Nguyen H, Krings T, Hutter B, Rohde V, Gilsbach J (2004) Course of brain shift during microsurgical resection of supratentorial cerebral lesions: limits of conventional neuronavigation. Acta Neurochir 146(4):369–377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Trantakis C, Tittgemeyer M, Schneider J, Lindner D, Winkler D, Strauss G, Meixensberger J (2003) Investigation of time-dependency of intracranial brain shift and its relation to the extent of tumor removal using intra-operative MRI. Neurol Res 25(1):9–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Soza G, Hastreiter P, Vega F, Rezk-Salama C, Bauer M, Nimsky C, Greiner G (2003) Non-linear intraoperative correction of brain shift with 1.5 T data. Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin. Springer, Berlin. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-18993-7_5

  7. Clatz O, Delingette H, Talos I, Golby A, Kikinis R, Jolesz F, Ayache N, Warfield S (2005) Robust non-rigid registration to capture brain shift from intra-operative MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 24(11):1417–1427

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hu J, Jin X, Lee J, Zhang L, Chaudhary V, Guthikonda M, Yang K, King A (2007) Intraoperative brain shift prediction using a 3D inhomogeneous patient specific finite element model. J Neurosurg 106:164–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hata N, Nabavi A, Wells W III, Warfield S, Kikinis R, Black P, Jolesz F (2000) Three-dimensional optical flow method for measurement of volumetric brain deformation from intraoperative MR images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24(4):531–538

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shattuck D, Leahy R (2002) Brain suite: an automated cortical surface identification tool. Med Image Anal 6(2):129–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferrant M, Nabavi A, Macq B, Black P, Jolesz F, Kikinis R, Warfield S (2002) Serial registration of intraoperative MR images of the brain. Med Image Anal 6(4):337–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kyriacou S, Davatzikos C, Zinreich S, Bryan R (1999) Nonlinear elastic registration of brain images with tumor pathology using a biomechanical model. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18(7):580–592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Miga M, Sinha T, Cash D, Galloway R, Weil R (2003) Cortical surface registration for image-guided neurosurgery using laser-range scanning. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22(8):973–985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Comeau R, Sadikot A, Fenster A, Peters T (2000) Intraoperative ultrasound for guidance and tissue shift correction in image-guided neurosurgery. Med Phys 27:787–800

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reinertsen I, Lindseth F, Unsqaard G, Collins D (2007) Clinical validation of vessel-based registration for correction of brain-shift. Med Image Anal 11(6):673–684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bucki M, Palombi O, Bailet M, Payan Y (2012) Doppler ultrasound driven biomedical model of the brain for intraoperative brain-shift compensation: a proof of concept in clinical conditions. In: Payan Y (ed) Soft tissue biomechanical modeling for computer assisted surgery. Studies in mechanobiology, tissue engineering and biomaterials series, vol 11. Springer, pp 135–165. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29014-5

  17. Hjelmeland A, Lathia J, Sathornsumetee S, Rich J (2011) Twisted tango: brain tumor neurovascular interactions. Nat Neurosci 14(11):1375–1381

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Joldes G, Wittek A, Couton M, Warfield S, Miller K (2009) Real-time prediction of brain shift using nonlinear finite element algorithms. In: Yang G, Hawkes D, Rueckert D, Noble A, Taylor C (eds) Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention (MICCAI 2009). Lecture notes in computer science, vol 5762. pp 300–307. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04271-3_37

  19. Mendoza C, Laugier C (2003) Tissue Cutting using finite elements and force feedback. In: Ayache N, Delingette H (eds) Surgery simulation and soft tissue modeling. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 2673, pp 175–182. doi:10.1007/3-540-45015-7_17

  20. Dadashi Serej N, Ahmadian A, Mohagheghi S, Sadrehosseini SM (2014) A projected landmark method for reduction of registration error in image-guided surgery systems. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10(5):541–554. doi:10.1007/s11548-014-1075-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Farnia P, Ahmadian A, Khoshnevisan A, Jaberzadeh A, Dadashi Serej N, Kazerooni AF (2011) An efficient point based registration of intra-operative ultrasound images with MR images for computation of brain shift; A phantom study. Proceedings of IEEE conference on engineering in medicine and biology (EMBS 2011) pp 8074–8077. doi:10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091991

  22. Free and open source software package for visualization and medical image computing. Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School. http://www.slicer.org/

  23. Free software for extracting triangulated iso-surfaces from a block of data. Machine Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Engineering, Cambridge University. http://mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~gmt11/software/isosurf/isosurf.html

  24. Free software for 3D finite element grid generation. Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Liege. http://www.geuz.org/gmsh/

  25. Chui H, Rangarajan A (2003) A new point matching algorithm for non-rigid registration. Comput Vis Image Underst 89(2/3):114–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Myronenko A, Song X (2010) Point set registration: coherent point drift. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 32(12):2262–2275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lewin JS, Nour SG, Meyers ML, Metzger AK, Maciunas RJ, Wendt M, Duerk JL, Oppelt A, Selman WR (2007) Intraoperative MRI with a rotating, tiltable surgical table: a time use study and clinical results in 122 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(5):1096–1103. doi:10.2214/AJR.06.1247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This Project was supported by the Research Center for Biomedical Technology and Robotics (RCBTR), and Rajaei Cardiovascular, Medical and Research Center, and Parseh Intelligent Surgical Systems (Parsiss Company), Tehran, Iran.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alireza Ahmadian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohammadi, A., Ahmadian, A., Azar, A.D. et al. Estimation of intraoperative brain shift by combination of stereovision and doppler ultrasound: phantom and animal model study. Int J CARS 10, 1753–1764 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1216-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1216-z

Keywords

Navigation